This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/6169321.stm
The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 7 | Version 8 |
---|---|
New UK pension scheme is unveiled | New UK pension scheme is unveiled |
(about 7 hours later) | |
Plans for the automatic enrolment of workers into a new pension system have been unveiled by the government. | Plans for the automatic enrolment of workers into a new pension system have been unveiled by the government. |
From 2012, workers not in occupational pension schemes will be enrolled in "personal accounts" unless they opt out, under the White Paper's plans. | From 2012, workers not in occupational pension schemes will be enrolled in "personal accounts" unless they opt out, under the White Paper's plans. |
Staff will pay in 4% of their salaries and employers 3%, with an extra 1% from the government in tax relief. | Staff will pay in 4% of their salaries and employers 3%, with an extra 1% from the government in tax relief. |
Ministers believe the new scheme, called personal accounts, will boost annual pension savings by up to £8bn. | Ministers believe the new scheme, called personal accounts, will boost annual pension savings by up to £8bn. |
The proposals affect up to 10 million workers who are not in employer-funded schemes. | The proposals affect up to 10 million workers who are not in employer-funded schemes. |
Launching details of the scheme, Pensions Secretary John Hutton said its aim was to overcome "the inertia and short-termism" which was stopping people making financial decisions, particularly in low-income households. | Launching details of the scheme, Pensions Secretary John Hutton said its aim was to overcome "the inertia and short-termism" which was stopping people making financial decisions, particularly in low-income households. |
The system's key features are that employers will be forced to contribute if their staff join up and individuals will keep their accounts when they move jobs. | The system's key features are that employers will be forced to contribute if their staff join up and individuals will keep their accounts when they move jobs. |
'Cheap to run' | 'Cheap to run' |
The government argues that the personal accounts will be cheap to run. | The government argues that the personal accounts will be cheap to run. |
Responding to fears that accumulated pension savings will simply erode entitlements to means-tested pension credits, ministers estimate that by 2050, nine out of ten pensioner households will benefit if they save in personal accounts. | Responding to fears that accumulated pension savings will simply erode entitlements to means-tested pension credits, ministers estimate that by 2050, nine out of ten pensioner households will benefit if they save in personal accounts. |
PERSONAL ACCOUNTS EXPLAINED Employees compelled to join the scheme, unless they already have a good workplace pension or choose to opt outContributions will be paid on earnings between £5,000 and £33,500 p.a.There will be an annual ceiling on total contributions of £5,000People will not be able to transfer funds from existing pension plansContributions will be collected centrally and paid into a choice of investment funds Start date for personal accounts will be 2012Personal accounts part of a wider pension shake-up involving a raising of the state pension age to 68 | |
"Without an increase in private savings, future generations could retire poorer than today's pensioners and poorer than they expect to be," the White Paper said. | "Without an increase in private savings, future generations could retire poorer than today's pensioners and poorer than they expect to be," the White Paper said. |
The government hopes the scheme will help plug the gap in the nation's retirement savings and supplement the continuing state pension and private pension systems. | The government hopes the scheme will help plug the gap in the nation's retirement savings and supplement the continuing state pension and private pension systems. |
The idea was first proposed by Lord Turner's Pensions Commission to ensure that more people save for retirement. | The idea was first proposed by Lord Turner's Pensions Commission to ensure that more people save for retirement. |
The new scheme will be set up by a delivery authority and then run by an independent personal accounts board similar to a set of pension fund trustees. | The new scheme will be set up by a delivery authority and then run by an independent personal accounts board similar to a set of pension fund trustees. |
Warm welcome | |
The government now believes that seven million people are failing to save enough for their retirement - substantially fewer than previous estimate of up to 12 million made by Lord Turner. | |
The publication of the White Paper outlining the government's proposals drew widespread support. | |
The Investment Managers Association said they provided the best choice for low cost pension provision. | |
Its chief executive Richard Saunders said: "The centrally administered model works best for small employers by providing a single point of contact for them and the minimum of red tape." | |
Gordon Lishman, director general of the charity Age Concern said: "Personal accounts will offer a beacon of hope to millions of people struggling to find their way through the pensions wilderness. | |
"The proposals put forward in this White Paper are good news for anyone without access to a decent occupational pension, many of whom are women," he added. | |
The TUC welcomed the plans as well. | |
"Compulsory employer contributions are a major gain for people at work," said TUC general secretary Brendan Barber. | |
"In particular, we welcome the government's rejection of employer lobbying for a waiting period before employees can join or rejoin the scheme in each new job." | |
However, the Association of British Insurers said that the plans needed some alteration. | |
It said the contribution cap was too high and that there was still some confusion about how personal accounts would interact with means-tested benefits. | |