This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7666022.stm
The article has changed 17 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 10 | Version 11 |
---|---|
Peers throw out 42-day detention | Peers throw out 42-day detention |
(41 minutes later) | |
Peers have rejected the government's controversial plans to extend the limit on pre-charge detention of terror suspects by a large majority. | Peers have rejected the government's controversial plans to extend the limit on pre-charge detention of terror suspects by a large majority. |
The House of Lords voted to keep the limit at 28 days by 309 votes to 118 - a majority of 191. | The House of Lords voted to keep the limit at 28 days by 309 votes to 118 - a majority of 191. |
The government is to make a statement in the Commons at 2030 BST. | The government is to make a statement in the Commons at 2030 BST. |
Last week ministers said the plan would return to MPs if defeated but there has been speculation it might be dropped rather than risk a Commons defeat. | Last week ministers said the plan would return to MPs if defeated but there has been speculation it might be dropped rather than risk a Commons defeat. |
BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said Monday's result was a much bigger defeat than had been expected. | BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said Monday's result was a much bigger defeat than had been expected. |
'Very difficult' | |
Last week ministers said the plan would return to MPs if defeated but there has been speculation it might be dropped rather than risk a Commons defeat. | |
In June it passed through the Commons by only nine votes, with the help of DUP MPs. | |
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is expected to make a statement in the next hour in the Commons. | |
I see no thin end of the wedge argument here Lord CarlileTerrorism law reviewer Q&A: Terror plansParliament hit by airport protest | |
Shadow security minister Baroness Neville Jones, who had described the 42-day plan as "unworkable" and "constitutionally worrying", told the BBC later there had been "very heavy abstentions on the government benches". | |
"This has been a very big majority against," she said. | |
"It must make it very difficult for the government to proceed with this piece of legislation and send it back to the Commons as if nothing had happened." | |
Crossbencher Lord Dear, a former chief constable who tabled the amendment to keep the pre-charge detention limit at 28 days, called ministers' plan "fatally flawed". | |
Balancing safety | |
Opening the debate, he said: "This attempt to appear tough on terrorism, I believe, is a shabby charade which is unworthy of a democratic process and we should reject it." | Opening the debate, he said: "This attempt to appear tough on terrorism, I believe, is a shabby charade which is unworthy of a democratic process and we should reject it." |
He said there was "no proven case" for changing the limit, that the legislation was "fatally flawed, ill thought-through and unnecessary" and would "further erode fundamental and legal rights that have been the pride of this country for centuries". | |
Supporting Lord Dear's amendment were Baroness Neville-Jones, Lib Dem frontbencher Lord Thomas and Labour QC Baroness Mallalieu. | |
But Security Minister Lord West had warned peers: "If it is rejected and the government is right... it could mean dangerous terrorists are released to commit atrocities." | |
He said: "As a government, we often face the issue that we are all wrestling with in this House, balancing the safety of the majority of our population against the freedom of the individual and I am certain where our duty lies." | |
And Lib Dem peer Lord Carlile, the official reviewer of terror laws, said he did not want to have to make changes to the law in the aftermath of a major terrorist attack. | |
"I see no thin end of the wedge argument here. What I see is finality in the law of detention with appropriate detention," he said. | |
He said he believed the extension would affect adversely a "maximum maybe of five or six people in the next four or five years". | |
"This is not the end of civil liberties as we know it. And it could have a consequence of saving many lives at home and abroad." | |
Several peers did not vote along party lines. Former lord chancellor Lord Falconer said he would vote against the government "with a heavy heart", while the former Conservative chairman Lord Tebbit said he would vote with the government. | Several peers did not vote along party lines. Former lord chancellor Lord Falconer said he would vote against the government "with a heavy heart", while the former Conservative chairman Lord Tebbit said he would vote with the government. |
Lord Tebbit warned his own party they may "rue this day" if they won the next general election and found they needed the powers. | |
The government failed in 2006 to extend pre-charge terror detention to a maximum of 90 days. Instead, the current 28-day limit was agreed as a compromise. | The government failed in 2006 to extend pre-charge terror detention to a maximum of 90 days. Instead, the current 28-day limit was agreed as a compromise. |
Ministers could use the Parliament Act to force the 42-day proposal into legislation. | |
But BBC political editor Nick Robinson reported last week that the government had decided against this, as it would be time-consuming and controversial. | |
During Monday's debate police had to lock the doors to Parliament after airport protesters tried to force their way into the Palace of Westminster. |