This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/7663014.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
IPCC probe into killing lawful IPCC probe into killing lawful
(10 minutes later)
The police investigation into the killing of a barrister shot dead by police during a five-hour armed siege was lawful, the High Court has ruled.The police investigation into the killing of a barrister shot dead by police during a five-hour armed siege was lawful, the High Court has ruled.
A judge dismissed a claim by the family of Mark Saunders, 32, that the police inquiry into his death was unlawful.A judge dismissed a claim by the family of Mark Saunders, 32, that the police inquiry into his death was unlawful.
Mr Saunders died in a stand-off at his flat in Chelsea, west London in May.Mr Saunders died in a stand-off at his flat in Chelsea, west London in May.
His family claimed the Independent Police Complaints Commission inquiry was unlawful as officers were allowed to confer before making statements.His family claimed the Independent Police Complaints Commission inquiry was unlawful as officers were allowed to confer before making statements.
During the siege Mr Saunders fired at police officers, neighbours and buildings with a legally-owned shotgun from his £2.2m home in Markham Square.During the siege Mr Saunders fired at police officers, neighbours and buildings with a legally-owned shotgun from his £2.2m home in Markham Square.
Conferring is not the colluding. To suggest otherwise is as insulting as it is inaccurate Paul Davis, Police Federation Conferring is not colluding. To suggest otherwise is as insulting as it is inaccurate Paul Davis, Police Federation
A post-mortem examination revealed that he died from multiple injuries.A post-mortem examination revealed that he died from multiple injuries.
His family believe he posed no risk to the public when he was shot, as the area had been evacuated.His family believe he posed no risk to the public when he was shot, as the area had been evacuated.
Mr Saunders' sister Charlotte brought the case to the High Court.Mr Saunders' sister Charlotte brought the case to the High Court.
"I brought these proceedings because I was concerned that the police officers who shot Mark were allowed to confer before giving their accounts to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)," she said."I brought these proceedings because I was concerned that the police officers who shot Mark were allowed to confer before giving their accounts to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)," she said.
But the police denied the family's central claim that conferring mounted to collusion.But the police denied the family's central claim that conferring mounted to collusion.
"Conferring is not colluding," said Paul Davis from the Police Federation."Conferring is not colluding," said Paul Davis from the Police Federation.
"To suggest otherwise is as insulting as it is inaccurate and does nothing to reassure members of the public that the police are there to defend and protect them. There is a huge difference between colluding and conferring.""To suggest otherwise is as insulting as it is inaccurate and does nothing to reassure members of the public that the police are there to defend and protect them. There is a huge difference between colluding and conferring."
Ms Saunders said she would be appealing against the High Court's ruling.Ms Saunders said she would be appealing against the High Court's ruling.