This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/7663014.stm

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Police probe into killing lawful Police probe into killing lawful
(31 minutes later)
The police investigation into the killing of a barrister shot dead by police during a five-hour armed siege was lawful, the High Court has ruled.The police investigation into the killing of a barrister shot dead by police during a five-hour armed siege was lawful, the High Court has ruled.
A judge dismissed a claim by the family of Mark Saunders, 32, that the police inquiry into his death was unlawful.A judge dismissed a claim by the family of Mark Saunders, 32, that the police inquiry into his death was unlawful.
Mr Saunders died in a stand-off at his flat in Chelsea, west London in May.Mr Saunders died in a stand-off at his flat in Chelsea, west London in May.
His family wanted the police inquiry to be ruled unlawful as officers were allowed to confer before making statements about the shooting.His family wanted the police inquiry to be ruled unlawful as officers were allowed to confer before making statements about the shooting.
During the siege Mr Saunders fired at police officers, neighbours and buildings with a legally-owned shotgun from his £2.2m home in Markham Square.During the siege Mr Saunders fired at police officers, neighbours and buildings with a legally-owned shotgun from his £2.2m home in Markham Square.
But his family believe he posed "no risk to the public" when he was shot, as the area had been evacuated. But his family believe he posed no risk to the public when he was shot, as the area had been evacuated.
Mr Saunders' sister Charlotte brought the case to the High Court.
"I brought these proceedings because I was concerned that the police officers who shot Mark were allowed to confer before giving their accounts to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC)," she said.
Ms Saunders said she would be appealing against the High Court's ruling.