This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/04/vote-leave-breached-electoral-rules-watchdog-will-find-reports

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Vote Leave breached electoral rules, watchdog will find – reports Electoral Commission 'accuses Vote Leave of breaking law'
(about 1 hour later)
Vote Leave will be accused of illegal coordination with a student organisation by the elections watchdog, according to the group’s former chief executive, who took the extraordinary step of pre-empting the official investigation. The elections watchdog has accused Vote Leave of illegal coordination with a student organisation, according to the campaign’s former chief executive, who took the extraordinary step of pre-empting the official investigation.
Matthew Elliott, who led the official Brexit campaign, said the Electoral Commission had concluded Vote Leave made a donation to a group it should not have. A preliminary investigation by the Electoral Commission has concluded that Vote Leave made a donation it should not have made to a smalller pro-Brexit group, according to Matthew Elliott, who ran the official Brexit campaign.
Elliott said the watchdog would find four breaches, including exceeding the spending limit, making an inaccurate return of campaign expenditure, missing invoices and receipts, failing to comply with a statutory notice. Elliott said the watchdog had found four potential breaches of election law, including exceeding the £7m spending limit, making an inaccurate return of campaign expenditure, missing invoices and receipts, and failing to comply with a statutory notice.
The Electoral Commission, which has not yet released its report, said it was “unusual” for the subject of a report to pre-empt its findings. Vote Leave said it was contesting the claims, and had gone public with its response to the commission, which is continuing to investigate.
The allegations centre on a £680,000 donation passed on by the campaign to a separate youth Brexit group called BeLeave, led by student Darren Grimes. The Electoral Commission said it was “unusual” for the subject of an investigation to try and pre-empt its findings.
It was alleged by whistleblowers that there was co-ordination between the two groups - which is not permitted by electoral law - and that the the money was actually used for the benefit of Vote Leave, to pay data firm Aggregate IQ for targeted social media messaging. The allegations centre on a £680,000 donation passed on by the campaign to a separate youth Brexit group called BeLeave, led by the student Darren Grimes.
Whistleblowers alleged that there was co-ordination between the two groups – which is not permitted by electoral law – and that the the money was actually used for the benefit of Vote Leave, to pay data firm Aggregate IQ for targeted social media messaging.
Had this cash been recorded as part of Vote Leave’s referendum expenditure, it would take the campaign’s spending over the £7m limit.Had this cash been recorded as part of Vote Leave’s referendum expenditure, it would take the campaign’s spending over the £7m limit.
Former Vote Leave volunteer Shahmir Sanni told the Observer earlier this year that Vote Leave had offered advice and assistance to BeLeave and helped them to decide where their cash would be spent, allegations he reported to the Electoral Commission and the police. Former Vote Leave volunteer Shahmir Sanni told the Observer earlier this year that Vote Leave had offered advice and assistance to BeLeave and helped it to decide where its cash would be spent, allegations he reported to the Electoral Commission and the police.
Vote Leave now admits there was email correspondence between Anthony Clake, who donated the cash, and Vote Leave’s campaign director Dominic Cummings about passing the donation onto BeLeave. Vote Leave now admits there was email correspondence between Anthony Clake, who donated the cash, and Vote Leave’s campaign director, Dominic Cummings, about passing the donation on to BeLeave.
In multiple broadcast interviews on Wednesday, Elliott accused the watchdog of not taking Vote Leave’s version of events into account.In multiple broadcast interviews on Wednesday, Elliott accused the watchdog of not taking Vote Leave’s version of events into account.
“Their initial conclusion is that we have overspent, that a donation we made to another group during the course of the campaign was incorrect, we shouldn’t have made that donation,” he told Sky News. “Their initial conclusion is that we have overspent, that a donation we made to another group during the course of the campaign was incorrect. We shouldn’t have made that donation,” he told Sky News.
Elliott said whistleblowers from the leave campaign, including Sanni, were “quite frankly marginal characters.”Elliott said whistleblowers from the leave campaign, including Sanni, were “quite frankly marginal characters.”
“I think it is a huge breach of natural justice that they haven’t wanted to listen to our opinions and our story and we were the people running the campaign,” he told Sky News.“I think it is a huge breach of natural justice that they haven’t wanted to listen to our opinions and our story and we were the people running the campaign,” he told Sky News.
Elliott told the BBC he had submitted a 500-page dossier to the Electoral Commission rebutting the claims.Elliott told the BBC he had submitted a 500-page dossier to the Electoral Commission rebutting the claims.
He said he thought Vote Leave had “acted both within the letter of the law and also the spirit of the law.” He said he thought Vote Leave had “acted both within the letter of the law and also the spirit of the law”.
An EC spokesman said: “The commission has concluded its investigation and having reached initial findings provided Vote Leave with a 28-day period to make any further or new representations. That period ended on Tuesday 3 July. A commission spokesman said: “The commission has concluded its investigation and, having reached initial findings, provided Vote Leave with a 28-day period to make any further or new representations. That period ended on Tuesday 3 July.
“The unusual step taken by Vote Leave in sharing its views on the Electoral Commission’s initial findings does not affect the process set out in law.”“The unusual step taken by Vote Leave in sharing its views on the Electoral Commission’s initial findings does not affect the process set out in law.”
The environment secretary, Michael Gove, one of the key figures in the Brexit campaign along with the foreign secretary, Boris Johnson, said he would not be drawn on the unpublished report because he believed it would be subject to a legal challenge. “I understand from the interviews Matthew Elliott has given that he vigorously contests some of what has been alleged in that report,” Gove told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. “The report itself is going to be challenged legally, and if it is, then if these matters are going through the courts, it would be inappropriate for me, not having read the report, to offer commentary.”
BrexitBrexit
news
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content