This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/29/iowa-abortion-law-waiting-period-illegal-supreme-court
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Iowa law forcing women to wait 72 hours before abortion ruled illegal | Iowa law forcing women to wait 72 hours before abortion ruled illegal |
| (17 days later) | |
| The Iowa supreme court on Friday blocked a law requiring a 72-hour waiting period before a woman can get an abortion. | The Iowa supreme court on Friday blocked a law requiring a 72-hour waiting period before a woman can get an abortion. |
| Abortion rights in 'dire, immediate danger' as Anthony Kennedy retires | Abortion rights in 'dire, immediate danger' as Anthony Kennedy retires |
| The court ruled that the law violates the state constitution, siding with a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood of Iowa and the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa. The organizations sued the state over the law, which was approved by lawmakers last year. | The court ruled that the law violates the state constitution, siding with a lawsuit filed by Planned Parenthood of Iowa and the American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa. The organizations sued the state over the law, which was approved by lawmakers last year. |
| A district court judge upheld the waiting period in September, but the supreme court blocked its implementation until it could hear arguments from both sides. | A district court judge upheld the waiting period in September, but the supreme court blocked its implementation until it could hear arguments from both sides. |
| The waiting period is part of a law banning most abortions after 20 weeks. The 20-week ban is in effect and was not part of the legal challenge. | The waiting period is part of a law banning most abortions after 20 weeks. The 20-week ban is in effect and was not part of the legal challenge. |
| Planned Parenthood argued that the court “should join the high courts in numerous other states that have found that the right to choose abortion warrants greater protection than has been afforded under the federal constitution”. | Planned Parenthood argued that the court “should join the high courts in numerous other states that have found that the right to choose abortion warrants greater protection than has been afforded under the federal constitution”. |
| The organization said supreme courts in 12 states had made such rulings. The Iowa decision came in the week that Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement from the US supreme court, a decision that boosted conservative hopes that the court will soon overturn Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling that guarantees the right to abortion. | The organization said supreme courts in 12 states had made such rulings. The Iowa decision came in the week that Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement from the US supreme court, a decision that boosted conservative hopes that the court will soon overturn Roe v Wade, the 1973 ruling that guarantees the right to abortion. |
| The Iowa supreme court has recognized privacy as a fundamental right in previous cases. Planned Parenthood argued that the court should conclude, in this case, that abortion was a core privacy right and should be treated like other fundamental rights under the Iowa constitution. | The Iowa supreme court has recognized privacy as a fundamental right in previous cases. Planned Parenthood argued that the court should conclude, in this case, that abortion was a core privacy right and should be treated like other fundamental rights under the Iowa constitution. |
| “Iowa has chosen to impose more severe burdens on women who choose abortion than almost all other states in violation of both the Iowa constitution and federal law,” the group’s attorney, Alice Clapman, argued in court. | “Iowa has chosen to impose more severe burdens on women who choose abortion than almost all other states in violation of both the Iowa constitution and federal law,” the group’s attorney, Alice Clapman, argued in court. |
| Clapman said women who seek abortions in Iowa “already make careful decisions. They already contend with massive obstacles in carrying out their decision”. The mandatory waiting period, also referred to as the “informed choice provision”, would make those obstacles far worse, she wrote. | Clapman said women who seek abortions in Iowa “already make careful decisions. They already contend with massive obstacles in carrying out their decision”. The mandatory waiting period, also referred to as the “informed choice provision”, would make those obstacles far worse, she wrote. |
| Iowa’s solicitor general, Jeffrey Thompson, argued that protecting unborn life is a state interest of the highest order. He said choosing to terminate a pregnancy is not a fundamental right under the Iowa constitution, and that the waiting period provides time for women to consider information about the procedure that abortion providers are required to provide, including an opportunity to view an ultrasound or hear a fetal heartbeat. | Iowa’s solicitor general, Jeffrey Thompson, argued that protecting unborn life is a state interest of the highest order. He said choosing to terminate a pregnancy is not a fundamental right under the Iowa constitution, and that the waiting period provides time for women to consider information about the procedure that abortion providers are required to provide, including an opportunity to view an ultrasound or hear a fetal heartbeat. |
| “The informed choice provision does not remove the ultimate decision from the woman,” he wrote in court documents. “Rather, it reflects the hope of the legislature that after receiving the information and taking some time to consider it, some women will choose to continue a pregnancy that they might otherwise have terminated.” | “The informed choice provision does not remove the ultimate decision from the woman,” he wrote in court documents. “Rather, it reflects the hope of the legislature that after receiving the information and taking some time to consider it, some women will choose to continue a pregnancy that they might otherwise have terminated.” |
| Iowa lawmakers earlier this year also passed a bill prohibiting abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected. That law also is on hold pending a legal challenge. | Iowa lawmakers earlier this year also passed a bill prohibiting abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected. That law also is on hold pending a legal challenge. |
| Abortion | Abortion |
| Iowa | Iowa |
| news | news |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |