This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/24/emergency-brake-was-disabled-on-self-driving-uber-that-killed-woman

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Emergency brake was disabled on self-driving Uber that killed woman Emergency brake was disabled on self-driving Uber that killed woman
(7 months later)
A federal investigation into a self-driving Uber SUV that hit and killed a pedestrian in March has found that the vehicle’s emergency braking system was disabled.A federal investigation into a self-driving Uber SUV that hit and killed a pedestrian in March has found that the vehicle’s emergency braking system was disabled.
The preliminary report, issued by the National Transportation Safety Board, said on Thursday that while the vehicle’s guidance system had spotted the woman about six seconds before hitting her, emergency braking manoeuvres were not enabled in order to “reduce the potential for erratic vehicle behavior”.The preliminary report, issued by the National Transportation Safety Board, said on Thursday that while the vehicle’s guidance system had spotted the woman about six seconds before hitting her, emergency braking manoeuvres were not enabled in order to “reduce the potential for erratic vehicle behavior”.
Instead, the Uber system anticipated that the human back-up driver would intervene. However, the automated system was not designed to alert the driver of the impending danger.Instead, the Uber system anticipated that the human back-up driver would intervene. However, the automated system was not designed to alert the driver of the impending danger.
Self-driving Uber kills Arizona woman in first fatal crash involving pedestrian
The car was traveling at 43 miles per hour and its sensors determined that braking was needed 1.3 seconds before impact, according to the report.The car was traveling at 43 miles per hour and its sensors determined that braking was needed 1.3 seconds before impact, according to the report.
But the driver began to steer less than a second before striking 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg, who was pushing a bicycle across a boulevard in the darkness in Tempe, Arizona, when the crash took place. The vehicle’s brakes were not applied until after the fatal impact.But the driver began to steer less than a second before striking 49-year-old Elaine Herzberg, who was pushing a bicycle across a boulevard in the darkness in Tempe, Arizona, when the crash took place. The vehicle’s brakes were not applied until after the fatal impact.
In an interview with NTSB investigators, Uber’s back-up driver said she had been monitoring the “self-driving interface”.In an interview with NTSB investigators, Uber’s back-up driver said she had been monitoring the “self-driving interface”.
On Wednesday, Uber announced it would cease testing its vehicles in Arizona and would focus on more limited testing in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and California.On Wednesday, Uber announced it would cease testing its vehicles in Arizona and would focus on more limited testing in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and California.
Uber said that it had worked closely with the NTSB and was conducting an internal review of its self-driving vehicle program.Uber said that it had worked closely with the NTSB and was conducting an internal review of its self-driving vehicle program.
The company also announced it had brought in the former NTSB chairman Christopher Hart “to advise us on our overall safety culture, and we look forward to sharing more on the changes we’ll make in the coming weeks”.The company also announced it had brought in the former NTSB chairman Christopher Hart “to advise us on our overall safety culture, and we look forward to sharing more on the changes we’ll make in the coming weeks”.
The NTSB said its preliminary report was not designed to assign responsibility for the crash.The NTSB said its preliminary report was not designed to assign responsibility for the crash.
Carl Tobias, a liability expert at the University of Richmond school of law, said the incident and Uber’s subsequent decision to pull out of testing in Arizona, underscores a need for greater regulatory oversight in the testing of self-driving vehicles.Carl Tobias, a liability expert at the University of Richmond school of law, said the incident and Uber’s subsequent decision to pull out of testing in Arizona, underscores a need for greater regulatory oversight in the testing of self-driving vehicles.
“It sounds like Uber is trying to work with the NTSB to move forward but this is a substantial setback. States are going to have to be extremely careful how they set up and regulate these programs.”“It sounds like Uber is trying to work with the NTSB to move forward but this is a substantial setback. States are going to have to be extremely careful how they set up and regulate these programs.”
Tobias continued: “We can’t have 50 different regimes and we may need some more systematic way to experiment with the technology without risking injuries and deaths. The states are going to need to protect people, and I don’t think we’re set up to do that yet. The question is how?”Tobias continued: “We can’t have 50 different regimes and we may need some more systematic way to experiment with the technology without risking injuries and deaths. The states are going to need to protect people, and I don’t think we’re set up to do that yet. The question is how?”
UberUber
Self-driving carsSelf-driving cars
ArizonaArizona
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content