This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-44059499
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Pupils 'routinely restrained' at Ipswich special school | Pupils 'routinely restrained' at Ipswich special school |
(about 2 hours later) | |
Children with special needs were routinely physically restrained at a school described by inspectors as "woeful" and "dire", a report said. | Children with special needs were routinely physically restrained at a school described by inspectors as "woeful" and "dire", a report said. |
The Bridge School in Ipswich has been rated as inadequate in all areas by the Ofsted inspectors. | The Bridge School in Ipswich has been rated as inadequate in all areas by the Ofsted inspectors. |
They found a "long-standing" and "serious" decline at the school which caters for children with severe and complex learning difficulties. | They found a "long-standing" and "serious" decline at the school which caters for children with severe and complex learning difficulties. |
The school and county council described the findings as "distressing reading". | The school and county council described the findings as "distressing reading". |
They said the report was a "thorough and accurate assessment" of the school at the time of the inspection in March; it had received a rating of good following a previous inspection in January 2015. | They said the report was a "thorough and accurate assessment" of the school at the time of the inspection in March; it had received a rating of good following a previous inspection in January 2015. |
Ofsted found routine use of physical restraint with some pupils, which was "poorly recorded" and "rarely reviewed by leaders". | Ofsted found routine use of physical restraint with some pupils, which was "poorly recorded" and "rarely reviewed by leaders". |
'More vigilant' | |
The watchdog said the learning environment did not meet the needs of the pupils and in some areas, it was of "dire quality". | The watchdog said the learning environment did not meet the needs of the pupils and in some areas, it was of "dire quality". |
Safeguarding systems were "woefully ineffective", inspectors said. | Safeguarding systems were "woefully ineffective", inspectors said. |
The report said pupils often became distressed and in 2016/2017, there were more than 2,000 incidents of poor behaviour at the 150-pupil school. | The report said pupils often became distressed and in 2016/2017, there were more than 2,000 incidents of poor behaviour at the 150-pupil school. |
Judith Mobbs, assistant director for inclusion and skills at Suffolk County Council, said: "We recognise that we've made mistakes and we should have been more vigilant. | |
"The important thing now is that there are children at this school who we collectively have to give a better deal to." | |
In a joint statement, the school and Suffolk County Council also said: "We know what needs to be done, including improving teaching and learning, behaviour and safeguarding and putting in place proper management systems. | |
Philip Illsley, chairman of Bridge School's interim executive board said the situation at the school had "moved on considerably" in the eight weeks since the inspection. | |
Whilst he accepted the picture reported by Ofsted was an accurate one, he added: "There were practices in place that were out-of-date and which are no longer used." | |
Mr Illesly took on the role the day after inspectors visited. |
Previous version
1
Next version