This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/home-office-asylum-seekers-torture-detention-centres-mp-inspectors-evidence-a8341641.html
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 2 | Version 3 |
---|---|
Home Office is keeping asylum seekers locked up in detention centres 'even after accepting they have been tortured' | Home Office is keeping asylum seekers locked up in detention centres 'even after accepting they have been tortured' |
(about 2 hours later) | |
The Home Office is keeping vulnerable asylum seekers locked up in detention centres even after accepting they have been tortured, MPs have been told. | The Home Office is keeping vulnerable asylum seekers locked up in detention centres even after accepting they have been tortured, MPs have been told. |
In every one of nine sample cases, detention was “maintained” despite officials acknowledging torture had taken place, inspectors revealed. | In every one of nine sample cases, detention was “maintained” despite officials acknowledging torture had taken place, inspectors revealed. |
The inquiry also heard that the Home Office had failed to produce improvement plans demanded for 16 of its centres – one dating back all the way to December 2016. | The inquiry also heard that the Home Office had failed to produce improvement plans demanded for 16 of its centres – one dating back all the way to December 2016. |
It was accused of waiting for migrants and asylum seekers to “give up” and leave the country, rather than settle their cases – exploiting the much-criticised absence of a time limit on detention. | |
The inspectors from HMI Prisons joined the growing calls for a time limit, warning of a “deep level of emotional distress” and rising number of suicides. | |
Hindpal Singh Bhui, the team leader, said 23 people had been locked up for more than one year at one centre, adding: “All too often we see cases where a kind of standoff develops. | Hindpal Singh Bhui, the team leader, said 23 people had been locked up for more than one year at one centre, adding: “All too often we see cases where a kind of standoff develops. |
“The Home Office is waiting for detainees to give up – whereas what we would rather they were doing is working very efficiently, effectively and quickly to resolve cases.” | “The Home Office is waiting for detainees to give up – whereas what we would rather they were doing is working very efficiently, effectively and quickly to resolve cases.” |
Mr Singh Bhui said the sample of rule 35 cases – people known to be vulnerable – had been carried out at Harmondsworth Immigration Removal Centre, finding torture in nine of the 10 people examined. | |
“Every one of those people had detention maintained despite the evidence of torture being accepted,” he told the Home Affairs Committee. | |
Peter Clarke, the chief inspector of prisons, said the backlog of improvement plans had risen from 12 to 16 – despite an apology for the delays from Caroline Nokes, the new immigration minister. | |
“If I have this degree of difficulty getting a response, what must it be like for detainees?” he asked. | “If I have this degree of difficulty getting a response, what must it be like for detainees?” he asked. |
Mr Clarke criticised the “uncertainty and distress” caused by the lack of a time limit, noting that 50 per cent of detainees were eventually “released back into the community”. | Mr Clarke criticised the “uncertainty and distress” caused by the lack of a time limit, noting that 50 per cent of detainees were eventually “released back into the community”. |
“Many of them go into detention and they don’t know how long they will be there for,” he warned. | “Many of them go into detention and they don’t know how long they will be there for,” he warned. |
There is growing criticism of Britain for being the only EU country without a statutory time limit for the detention of migrants, including by the UN Human Rights Council. | There is growing criticism of Britain for being the only EU country without a statutory time limit for the detention of migrants, including by the UN Human Rights Council. |
The Home Office has paid £21.2m to migrants it unlawfully detained over the past five years, laying bare its “chaotic decisions” critics say. | The Home Office has paid £21.2m to migrants it unlawfully detained over the past five years, laying bare its “chaotic decisions” critics say. |
Ms Nokes argued that only 5 per cent of people “subject to immigration rules” were in detention and that the total was going down. | Ms Nokes argued that only 5 per cent of people “subject to immigration rules” were in detention and that the total was going down. |
But she admitted the Home Office could “do better’, saying: “Of course I’m deeply troubled by some of the cases I have seen.” | But she admitted the Home Office could “do better’, saying: “Of course I’m deeply troubled by some of the cases I have seen.” |
Later, the minister came under fire over the decision – sneaked out late last Friday evening – to extend the G4S contract to run Brook House immigration removal centre. | Later, the minister came under fire over the decision – sneaked out late last Friday evening – to extend the G4S contract to run Brook House immigration removal centre. |
The move comes months after secret footage revealed guards apparently choking, mocking and abusing detainees at the centre, near Gatwick airport. | |
The immigration minister insisted it made sense to keep G4S in place, because the contract expired this month and a transfer to another company would be potentially “difficult”. | The immigration minister insisted it made sense to keep G4S in place, because the contract expired this month and a transfer to another company would be potentially “difficult”. |
“It was imperative to resolve the matter,” she told the MPs – arguing it had been announced at the “first opportunity” after the end of purdah for the local council elections. | “It was imperative to resolve the matter,” she told the MPs – arguing it had been announced at the “first opportunity” after the end of purdah for the local council elections. |