This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-press-regulation-free-speech-mp-dup-conservatives-a8341466.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Theresa May urges MPs to ditch tighter press regulation that would 'undermine' free speech Theresa May urges MPs to ditch tighter press regulation that would 'undermine' free speech
(about 2 hours later)
Theresa May is urging MPs to reject a bid to further tighten press regulation ahead of a knife-edge vote on new proposals in the Commons.Theresa May is urging MPs to reject a bid to further tighten press regulation ahead of a knife-edge vote on new proposals in the Commons.
The prime minister told senior ministers at Cabinet that plans put forward by opposition MPs would “undermine” the free press and unjustly see papers forking out crippling sums of money even if they do not lose legal cases. The prime minister told senior ministers at cabinet that plans put forward by opposition MPs would “undermine” the free press and unjustly see papers forking out crippling sums of money even if they do not lose legal cases.
But government insiders have suggested there is a serious chance of the proposals passing, with questions over how the DUP may vote and some Tories planning on abstaining.But government insiders have suggested there is a serious chance of the proposals passing, with questions over how the DUP may vote and some Tories planning on abstaining.
It comes after local newspapers warned many of their number will be forced to close if the plans are passed.It comes after local newspapers warned many of their number will be forced to close if the plans are passed.
Ms May’s spokesman said: “We have set out the importance of these votes and of the government resisting those amendments and we would hope that when MPs come to consider these amendments, they will look at the strength of the case that we’ve put forward.”Ms May’s spokesman said: “We have set out the importance of these votes and of the government resisting those amendments and we would hope that when MPs come to consider these amendments, they will look at the strength of the case that we’ve put forward.”
When David Cameron announced the Leveson Inquiry into the ethics and practices of the press following the phone-hacking scandal in 2011, he said a second phase would be launched once police investigations and court cases were concluded.When David Cameron announced the Leveson Inquiry into the ethics and practices of the press following the phone-hacking scandal in 2011, he said a second phase would be launched once police investigations and court cases were concluded.
But there was fury from some celebrities and privacy campaigners when Culture Secretary Matt Hancock announced in March this year that the second phase was being ditched.But there was fury from some celebrities and privacy campaigners when Culture Secretary Matt Hancock announced in March this year that the second phase was being ditched.
In response, former Labour leader Ed Miliband tabled an amendment to the Data Protection Bill to establish a new statutory inquiry into the media.In response, former Labour leader Ed Miliband tabled an amendment to the Data Protection Bill to establish a new statutory inquiry into the media.
A second amendment, tabled by Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson, would see publishers not signed up to a state-supported regulator pay their own and their opponent’s legal costs in data protection cases, even if they win.A second amendment, tabled by Labour’s deputy leader Tom Watson, would see publishers not signed up to a state-supported regulator pay their own and their opponent’s legal costs in data protection cases, even if they win.
Ms May’s spokesman said: “Almost £50m of public money has already been spent on investigating phone-hacking, and establishing a further public inquiry requiring great time and expense is not a proportionate solution to allegations which have already been the subject of several extensive police investigations or ongoing investigations by the Information Commissioner’s Office.Ms May’s spokesman said: “Almost £50m of public money has already been spent on investigating phone-hacking, and establishing a further public inquiry requiring great time and expense is not a proportionate solution to allegations which have already been the subject of several extensive police investigations or ongoing investigations by the Information Commissioner’s Office.
“The prime minister said [at Cabinet] the government remains committed to a voluntary system of independent press self-regulation.” “The prime minister said [at cabinet] the government remains committed to a voluntary system of independent press self-regulation.”
He added: “The prime minister said many would consider it against natural justice that, even if a newspaper was found not to be at fault, they could still end up having to pay costs.” He added: “The prime minister said many would consider it against natural justice that, even if a newspaper was found not to be at fault, it could still end up having to pay costs.”
Local newspaper editors have warned fresh attempts to tighten press regulation would cause “irreparable damage” to the industry.Local newspaper editors have warned fresh attempts to tighten press regulation would cause “irreparable damage” to the industry.
A survey of them undertaken by the  News Media Association, 92 per cent of respondents said they did not think another “Leveson-style” inquiry into the media should take place with the remaining 8 per cent saying they were unsure. In a survey of carried out by the News Media Association, 92 per cent of local editors said they did not think another “Leveson-style” inquiry into the media should take place, with the remaining 8 per cent saying they were unsure.
Meanwhile, 69 per cent said they thought some local newspapers would be forced to close if the amendment on costs became law, while 99 per cent said it would make it harder to publish.Meanwhile, 69 per cent said they thought some local newspapers would be forced to close if the amendment on costs became law, while 99 per cent said it would make it harder to publish.