A challenge against employers' rights to make people retire at 65 has reached a key stage in the European courts.
A challenge to the right of employers to make people retire at 65 has been rejected by a European court adviser.
An Advocate-general - a senior legal adviser to the European Court of Justice - is due to give recommendations in the case.
An Advocate-general, a senior legal adviser to the European Court of Justice, backed current UK rules - although the decision is not binding.
Age Concern has challenged British law, which since 2006 has allowed employers to compel retirement after age 65.
Age Concern is challenging UK laws, which since 2006 have allowed employers to compel workers to retire at 65.
Some 260 people in Britain have cases at employment tribunals which depend on the court's ultimate decision.
Some 260 people in Britain have cases at employment tribunals which depend on the European court's ultimate decision.
Many believe they have been unfairly treated and are worse off because they had to retire at 65.
Many believe they have been unfairly treated and are worse off because they had to retire at 65.
Campaigners, who believe that setting an age limit is discriminatory, stressed that the case would run for some time - even if the Advocate-General made recommendations in their favour.
Campaigners, who believe that setting an age limit is discriminatory, stressed that the case would run for some time.
Timescale
Timescale
The Advocate-General's view could influence the judges who are expected to give their ruling in the case just before Christmas.
The Advocate-General's view could influence the judges who are expected to give their ruling in the case just before Christmas, but it is not binding.
If they found in the campaigners' favour, the case would then return for a final hearing in a British court.
If they eventually find in the campaigners' favour, the case could then return for a final hearing in a British court.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Consultant paediatrician Nigel Speight on being forced out of his job at 65
Consultant paediatrician Nigel Speight on being forced out of his job at 65
The employers' organisation the CBI has argued that a normal retirement age of 65 is an essential management tool.
The employers' organisation the CBI has argued that a normal retirement age of 65 is an essential management tool.
It has added that employees can ask to work beyond that age.
It has added that employees can ask to work beyond that age.
Employers have a duty to consider these requests, and the CBI has said that this system has proved to be a success.
Employers have a duty to consider these requests, and the CBI has said that this system has proved to be a success.
'Unfair'
The case is being brought by Heyday - part of Age Concern. It was prompted by a survey of 60,000 people, with 80% claiming the rules were unfair.
Director Ailsa Olgive said that the current rules were "costing good workers their jobs".
"Denying people work because of their date of birth is grossly unfair, and in these tough times we expect more people will need to carry on working into 'retirement' in order to make ends meet," she said.
"More than a million people are already working past state pension age and they are the fastest growing group in the workforce."
Should people over the age of 65 be allowed to work? Are you of retirement age? Would you like to continue to work?
Should people over the age of 65 be allowed to work? Are you of retirement age? Would you like to continue to work?
Send us your comments by completing the form below.
Send us your comments by completing the form below.
In most cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.
In most cases a selection of your comments will be published, displaying your name and location unless you state otherwise in the box below.
