This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/us/politics/mark-zuckerberg-testimony.html

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 9 Version 10
Mark Zuckerberg Testimony to Congress: Live Updates Mark Zuckerberg’s Testimony: Senators Question Facebook’s Commitment to Privacy
(35 minutes later)
Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, began the first of two marathon hearings on Tuesday afternoon, answering tough questions on the company’s mishandling of data in a series of debacles over the past year.Facebook’s chief executive, Mark Zuckerberg, began the first of two marathon hearings on Tuesday afternoon, answering tough questions on the company’s mishandling of data in a series of debacles over the past year.
Much of the questioning from a combined panel of two Senate committees centered around the harvesting of sensitive user data by Cambridge Analytica, a consulting firm. Lawmakers warned that they are skeptical that the company can regulate itself and threatened to enact privacy rules and other regulations.Much of the questioning from a combined panel of two Senate committees centered around the harvesting of sensitive user data by Cambridge Analytica, a consulting firm. Lawmakers warned that they are skeptical that the company can regulate itself and threatened to enact privacy rules and other regulations.
The senators pressed Mr. Zuckerberg to figure out how third-party partners could have collected data without users’ knowledge. They said they weren’t sure if they could trust a company that has repeatedly violated its privacy promises. Among the highlights:
But Mr. Zuckerberg, surrounded by his top legal and policy executives, appeared well-coached. He answered questions directly and without defensiveness. This was Facebook’s main goal and it had hired high-power Washington lawyers to coach him. The senators pressed Mr. Zuckerberg to figure out how third-party partners could have collected data without users’ knowledge. They said they weren’t sure if they could trust a company that has repeatedly violated its privacy promises.
He even made a small joke, saying the company’s mantra of “move fast and break things,” has been changed to “move fast with stable infrastructure.” Mr. Zuckerberg, surrounded by his top legal and policy executives, appeared well-coached. He answered questions directly and without defensiveness. This was Facebook’s main goal and it had hired high-power Washington lawyers to coach him.
“Which is a much less sexy mantra,” Mr. Zuckerberg added. Mr. Zuckerberg will also appear at 10 a.m. Wednesday before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Tuesday’s hearing before the joint Senate Judiciary and Commerce Committees will be followed on Wednesday morning with Mr. Zuckerberg appearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
— Cecilia Kang— Cecilia Kang
Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, zeroed in on the issue at the heart of Facebook’s troubles, asking Mr. Zuckerberg whether he would be comfortable sharing the name of the hotel he stayed in last night or if he would be comfortable sharing the names of the people he has messaged this week.
“No. I would probably not choose to do that publicly here,” Mr. Zuckerberg said.
“I think that may be what this is all about,” Mr. Durbin said. “Your right to privacy. The limits of your right to privacy. And how much you give away in modern America in the name of, quote, connecting people around the world.”
Much of the hearing so far has centered on Cambridge Analytica. The hearing was called as a result of reporting by The New York Times on the company’s data harvesting. Lawmakers asked Mr. Zuckerberg what, if anything, he knew about Cambridge’s harvesting, what he was doing to ensure it would not happen again and whether he knew of other operations that engaged in similar data collection on the platform.Much of the hearing so far has centered on Cambridge Analytica. The hearing was called as a result of reporting by The New York Times on the company’s data harvesting. Lawmakers asked Mr. Zuckerberg what, if anything, he knew about Cambridge’s harvesting, what he was doing to ensure it would not happen again and whether he knew of other operations that engaged in similar data collection on the platform.
Mr. Zuckerberg said Facebook would be “investigating many apps, tens of thousands of apps, and if we find any suspicious activity, we’re going to conduct a full audit of those apps to understand how they’re using their data and if they’re doing anything improper. If we find that they’re doing anything improper, we’ll ban them from Facebook and we will tell everyone affected.”Mr. Zuckerberg said Facebook would be “investigating many apps, tens of thousands of apps, and if we find any suspicious activity, we’re going to conduct a full audit of those apps to understand how they’re using their data and if they’re doing anything improper. If we find that they’re doing anything improper, we’ll ban them from Facebook and we will tell everyone affected.”
— Matthew Rosenberg— Matthew Rosenberg
Senator Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, pressed Mr. Zuckerberg on Russia’s exploitation of the platform during the 2016 presidential election.Senator Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, pressed Mr. Zuckerberg on Russia’s exploitation of the platform during the 2016 presidential election.
Mr. Zuckerberg admitted that the company’s effort to find and stop the Russian meddling was “slow,” and called that failure “one of my greatest regrets.” He said Facebook was tracking known Russian hacking groups in real time but took much longer to recognize the inflammatory posts of the Internet Research Agency, a private company with Kremlin ties.Mr. Zuckerberg admitted that the company’s effort to find and stop the Russian meddling was “slow,” and called that failure “one of my greatest regrets.” He said Facebook was tracking known Russian hacking groups in real time but took much longer to recognize the inflammatory posts of the Internet Research Agency, a private company with Kremlin ties.
“There are people in Russia whose job is to exploit our systems,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. “This is an arms race.”“There are people in Russia whose job is to exploit our systems,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. “This is an arms race.”
But the Facebook founder said the company deployed new artificial intelligence tools to detect malicious activity in elections in France, Italy and a special Senate race in Alabama. He said he believed the new technology would help protect the integrity of elections around the world from manipulation via Facebook.But the Facebook founder said the company deployed new artificial intelligence tools to detect malicious activity in elections in France, Italy and a special Senate race in Alabama. He said he believed the new technology would help protect the integrity of elections around the world from manipulation via Facebook.
— Scott Shane— Scott Shane
Early impressions of Mr. Zuckerberg’s testimony were positive. In his first appearance before Congress, he appeared confident and answered questions directly. At first he was grim-faced, looked tired and serious. But he warmed up after an hour and offered humor about the company’s motto. He insisted on continuing questions when offered a break, eliciting smiles and laughter from staff sitting behind him.
“This is a different Mark Zuckerberg than the Street was fearing,” said Daniel Ives, chief strategy officer and head of technology research for GBH Insights in New York. “It’s a defining 48 hours that will determine the future of Facebook and so far he has passed with flying colors and the Street is relieved.”
Investors appeared pleased: Facebook’s stock closed up nearly 4.5 percent.
When asked if the average consumer understands what they are signing up for, Mr. Zuckerberg gave a candid reply that they probably don’t.
“I don’t think that the average person likely reads that whole document,” he said, referring to a printout of Facebook’s privacy policy that Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was holding aloft. “But I think that there are different ways that we can communicate that and have a responsibility to do so.”
This is important because Mr. Zuckerberg has often talked about consumer responsibility. He has said consumers ultimately make decisions over their privacy on the social network.
— Cecilia Kang
Mr. Graham also pressed Mr. Zuckerberg on whether Facebook is a monopoly, asking him to explain what other options customers have if they get frustrated with the social network.
While Mr. Graham, the South Carolina Republican, tried compare his industry to the car business, where people can switch from Ford to Chevrolet if they want, Mr. Zuckerberg insisted that in his case, it’s complicated. He noted that Facebook overlaps with companies like Google and Twitter and that he faces competition from a variety of popular apps.
“You don’t think you have a monopoly?” Mr. Graham asked.
Mr. Zuckerberg replied: “It doesn’t feel that way to me.”
Senator John Cornyn of Texas, the majority whip, asked if Facebook’s motto is still “move fast and break things.” Mr. Zuckerberg said it has been revised.
“I don’t know when we changed it,” Mr. Zuckerberg replied, “but the mantra is currently ‘move fast with stable infrastructure,’ which is a much less sexy mantra.” He appeared to be joking, eliciting laughs from the executives sitting behind him.
— Cecilia Kang
Mr. Zuckerberg said that Facebook was working with Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election and potential ties to the Trump campaign.
Replying to Senator Patrick Leahy, Democrat of Vermont, Mr. Zuckerberg initially seemed to confirm that Facebook had been served with subpoenas along the way, before saying he was not certain.
“I want to be careful here because our work with the special counsel is confidential,” he said. “And I want to make sure that in an open session I’m not revealing something that’s confidential.”
Mr. Zuckerberg said he had not personally spoken with investigators from Mr. Mueller’s team, but that he thought others at the company had.
— Nicholas Fandos
Mr. Zuckerberg has a history of apologizing for the company’s mistakes and promising to do better. Wired Magazine recently noted that Mr. Zuckerberg has a 14-year history of apologizing. That seems to have caused some consternation on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers prodded Mr. Zuckerberg about why, exactly, they should believe his promises now.Mr. Zuckerberg has a history of apologizing for the company’s mistakes and promising to do better. Wired Magazine recently noted that Mr. Zuckerberg has a 14-year history of apologizing. That seems to have caused some consternation on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers prodded Mr. Zuckerberg about why, exactly, they should believe his promises now.
“After more than a decade of promises to do better, how is today’s apology different and why should we trust Facebook to make the necessary changes to ensure user privacy and give people a clearer picture of your privacy policies?” Mr. Thune asked. “After more than a decade of promises to do better, how is today’s apology different and why should we trust Facebook to make the necessary changes to ensure user privacy and give people a clearer picture of your privacy policies?” Senator John Thune, Republican of South Dakota, asked.
Mr. Zuckerberg referred again to his company’s humble beginnings in his dorm room at Harvard.Mr. Zuckerberg referred again to his company’s humble beginnings in his dorm room at Harvard.
“So we have made a lot of mistakes in running the company. I think it’s pretty much impossible, I believe, to start a company in your dorm room and then grow it to be at the scale that we’re at now without making some mistakes.”“So we have made a lot of mistakes in running the company. I think it’s pretty much impossible, I believe, to start a company in your dorm room and then grow it to be at the scale that we’re at now without making some mistakes.”
Mr. Thune, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, called Facebook and its role in society “extraordinary” and began the hearing by explaining why Facebook is being singled out and why Mr. Zuckerberg was asked to appear alone.Mr. Thune, the chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, called Facebook and its role in society “extraordinary” and began the hearing by explaining why Facebook is being singled out and why Mr. Zuckerberg was asked to appear alone.
He said the Cambridge Analytica situation underscored how Facebook can be used for nefarious reasons, saying it appeared “to be the result of people exploiting the tools you created to manipulate users’ information.”He said the Cambridge Analytica situation underscored how Facebook can be used for nefarious reasons, saying it appeared “to be the result of people exploiting the tools you created to manipulate users’ information.”
In an indication that he may support legislation for internet companies, Mr. Thune said, “In the past, many of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle have been willing to defer to tech companies’ efforts to regulate themselves. But this may be changing.”In an indication that he may support legislation for internet companies, Mr. Thune said, “In the past, many of my colleagues on both sides of the aisle have been willing to defer to tech companies’ efforts to regulate themselves. But this may be changing.”
Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, said the tech industry “has a responsibility” to protect its users and said “the status quo no longer works.”Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, said the tech industry “has a responsibility” to protect its users and said “the status quo no longer works.”
— Cecilia Kang— Cecilia Kang
That was the accusation that Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, was leveling at Mr. Zuckerberg when he grilled him for several minutes as to why the social network has been allegedly censoring content from conservative organizations and Trump supporters.
Mr. Zuckerberg declined to answer whether Facebook is a neutral public forum or if it is expressing its own views of free speech, avoiding a complex legal question that Mr. Cruz was posing.
However, Mr. Zuckerberg insisted that the company does not discriminate against Republican employees and that its definition for what kind of language should be kept off the platform was rooted in common sense.
“I am very committed to making sure that Facebook is a platform for all ideas,” he said after Mr. Cruz ticked off several examples of potential liberal bias on the social network.
— Alan Rappeport
Mr. Zuckerberg is the only technology chief in the room, but it is clear that members of Congress are treating him as a stand-in for the entirety of Silicon Valley.Mr. Zuckerberg is the only technology chief in the room, but it is clear that members of Congress are treating him as a stand-in for the entirety of Silicon Valley.
Mr. Grassley called the entire tech industry to account, saying “the tech industry has an obligation to … restore the public’s trust.” Mr. Nelson put it even more bluntly: “If you and other social media companies do not get your act in order, none of us are going to have any privacy.”Mr. Grassley called the entire tech industry to account, saying “the tech industry has an obligation to … restore the public’s trust.” Mr. Nelson put it even more bluntly: “If you and other social media companies do not get your act in order, none of us are going to have any privacy.”
In his opening statement, Mr. Zuckerberg, who is 33, made a point to remind Congress that he was young when this all began.In his opening statement, Mr. Zuckerberg, who is 33, made a point to remind Congress that he was young when this all began.
“I started Facebook when I was in college,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. This is a recurring theme for Mr. Zuckerberg — in many recent interviews, he has referred to starting Facebook in his Harvard dorm room. And perhaps it is wise to keep bringing up the fact that Mr. Zuckerberg is much younger than most of the business executives who come before Congress.“I started Facebook when I was in college,” Mr. Zuckerberg said. This is a recurring theme for Mr. Zuckerberg — in many recent interviews, he has referred to starting Facebook in his Harvard dorm room. And perhaps it is wise to keep bringing up the fact that Mr. Zuckerberg is much younger than most of the business executives who come before Congress.
But the strategy could also backfire. After all, Mr. Zuckerberg is a long way from his dorm room — he is a veteran executive and a billionaire who has been running a major American corporation for more than a decade. Reminding lawmakers of his youth could lead them to question whether Mr. Zuckerberg is mature enough to handle such enormous responsibilities and whether Silicon Valley needs more adult supervision in the way of additional federal regulation.But the strategy could also backfire. After all, Mr. Zuckerberg is a long way from his dorm room — he is a veteran executive and a billionaire who has been running a major American corporation for more than a decade. Reminding lawmakers of his youth could lead them to question whether Mr. Zuckerberg is mature enough to handle such enormous responsibilities and whether Silicon Valley needs more adult supervision in the way of additional federal regulation.
— Kevin Roose— Kevin Roose
The gap in knowledge about how Facebook’s business works was on display at times during Mr. Zuckerberg’s testimony.The gap in knowledge about how Facebook’s business works was on display at times during Mr. Zuckerberg’s testimony.
The company has faced questions about the possibility of creating a paid service that would allow users to opt-out of sharing their data or seeing advertisements.The company has faced questions about the possibility of creating a paid service that would allow users to opt-out of sharing their data or seeing advertisements.
Mr. Zuckerberg insisted on Tuesday that there would always be a free version of Facebook, so that anyone in the world can afford to be part of its online community.Mr. Zuckerberg insisted on Tuesday that there would always be a free version of Facebook, so that anyone in the world can afford to be part of its online community.
At that point, Senator Orrin G. Hatch, the Utah Republican, asked Mr. Zuckerberg how he could sustain a business without charging anything for it.At that point, Senator Orrin G. Hatch, the Utah Republican, asked Mr. Zuckerberg how he could sustain a business without charging anything for it.
“Sir, we run ads,” Mr. Zuckerberg explained.“Sir, we run ads,” Mr. Zuckerberg explained.
Mr. Hatch replied: “I see.”Mr. Hatch replied: “I see.”
— Alan Rappeport— Alan Rappeport
There are a lot of numbers flying around in the hearing. So, to be clear: The figure of 87 million affected Facebook users comes from Facebook itself, and refers to the number of people the company calculated could have been affected, not the number who were.There are a lot of numbers flying around in the hearing. So, to be clear: The figure of 87 million affected Facebook users comes from Facebook itself, and refers to the number of people the company calculated could have been affected, not the number who were.
Alexandr Kogan, the academic who Cambridge Analytica hired to harvest the Facebook data, has said that he collected information from the profiles of more than 50 million people. That figure is backed up by documents that have been reviewed by The New York Times, and other former employees of Cambridge Analytica.Alexandr Kogan, the academic who Cambridge Analytica hired to harvest the Facebook data, has said that he collected information from the profiles of more than 50 million people. That figure is backed up by documents that have been reviewed by The New York Times, and other former employees of Cambridge Analytica.
— Matthew Rosenberg— Matthew Rosenberg
Mr. Zuckerberg was accompanied by the senior staff members that have been charged with addressing the company’s months of privacy and election interference debacles. He entered the room with Joel Kaplan, vice president of global public policy, a Republican who worked in the George W. Bush administration. Mr. Kaplan sat behind Mr. Zuckerberg along with Colin B. Stretch, the company’s general counsel, and Erin Egan, Facebook’s chief privacy officer. The executives have been scrambling for about one year with one crisis after another that brought Mr. Stretch to testify last November in Russia’s interference in the elections.
— Cecilia Kang
This morning, many people woke up to a Facebook notification that their personal information had been collected by “This Is Your Digital Life,” a quiz app developed by a University of Cambridge researcher, which harvested the data that was ultimately passed to Cambridge Analytica. According to the notification, the app collected data including users’ public profile information, page likes, birthdays, and current cities.This morning, many people woke up to a Facebook notification that their personal information had been collected by “This Is Your Digital Life,” a quiz app developed by a University of Cambridge researcher, which harvested the data that was ultimately passed to Cambridge Analytica. According to the notification, the app collected data including users’ public profile information, page likes, birthdays, and current cities.
But Facebook’s notifications also alerted people that their messages were possibly accessed during the breach. Aleksandr Kogan, a Russian-American academic who contracted with Cambridge Analytica’s British affiliate to harvest and provide private Facebook data, told The New York Times that the app harvested messages from the people who took part in the quiz directly, but not their extended friend network. Mr. Kogan added that the messages were not transferred to Cambridge Analytica.But Facebook’s notifications also alerted people that their messages were possibly accessed during the breach. Aleksandr Kogan, a Russian-American academic who contracted with Cambridge Analytica’s British affiliate to harvest and provide private Facebook data, told The New York Times that the app harvested messages from the people who took part in the quiz directly, but not their extended friend network. Mr. Kogan added that the messages were not transferred to Cambridge Analytica.
Read more »Read more »
Mr. Zuckerberg is clad in a suit and tie at his hearing. He will also have a booster seat to help give his testimony a lift.Mr. Zuckerberg is clad in a suit and tie at his hearing. He will also have a booster seat to help give his testimony a lift.
Mr. Zuckerberg took to his social platform ahead of his Senate appearance, posting a photo of the Capitol building surrounded by cherry blossoms and a message about what he planned to tell lawmakers.Mr. Zuckerberg took to his social platform ahead of his Senate appearance, posting a photo of the Capitol building surrounded by cherry blossoms and a message about what he planned to tell lawmakers.
“In an hour I’m going to testify in front of the Senate about how Facebook needs to take a broader view of our responsibility — not just to build tools, but to make sure those tools are used for good. I will do everything I can to make Facebook a place where everyone can stay closer with the people they care about, and to make sure it’s a positive force in the world.”“In an hour I’m going to testify in front of the Senate about how Facebook needs to take a broader view of our responsibility — not just to build tools, but to make sure those tools are used for good. I will do everything I can to make Facebook a place where everyone can stay closer with the people they care about, and to make sure it’s a positive force in the world.”
``
Senator Chris Coons of Delaware, a moderate Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, did not need to look far Tuesday morning for evidence of what ails Facebook after finding two fake accounts:Senator Chris Coons of Delaware, a moderate Democratic member of the Judiciary Committee, did not need to look far Tuesday morning for evidence of what ails Facebook after finding two fake accounts:
Facebook took quick action, taking down the two fake accounts, according to an aide to the senator. But Mr. Coons was hardly placated.Facebook took quick action, taking down the two fake accounts, according to an aide to the senator. But Mr. Coons was hardly placated.
“They’ve already fixed it,” said the aide, Sean Coit. “But how do they respond to an average person in Smyrna, Delaware, who’s getting scammed?”“They’ve already fixed it,” said the aide, Sean Coit. “But how do they respond to an average person in Smyrna, Delaware, who’s getting scammed?”
—Nicholas Fandos—Nicholas Fandos