This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7615630.stm
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Lib Dems approve income tax cuts | |
(about 19 hours later) | |
The Liberal Democrats have backed plans to make cuts to income tax for people on low and middling salaries. | |
Party members in Bournemouth approved a policy document promising "big" reductions for struggling families at the next election. | |
Several MPs opposed the plan, urging leader Nick Clegg to keep spending on key public services as his priority. | |
The vote means the Lib Dems are the only one of the three main parties currently offering tax cuts. | |
The move, on top of an existing pledge to cut income tax by 4p, is seen by some as a bid to win over Conservative voters. | |
'Tighten belts' | |
The Lib Dems have campaigned in recent elections on specific tax-raising pledges and there is opposition to its new goal of cutting taxes for low and middle-income earners. | |
The leadership proposes to find the money for cutting the overall burden of taxation through £20bn worth of savings in public spending. | |
Backing the tax-cutting motion, chief Lib Dem policy adviser Danny Alexander said it was necessary for "government to tighten its belt a little so that low-income families don't have to tighten theirs a lot". | |
"We will target investment where it is needed," he said. | |
"But once we have invested in our priorities, we would rather hand back money to struggling families rather than central government. That is the choice." | |
Science spokesman Evan Harris tabled an amendment to the motion, insisting public services should be the main priority, rather than tax cuts, which was defeated. | |
class="lp" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/talking_point/default.stm">HAVE YOUR SAYI would be delighted if they could actually implement this. Unfortunately the very wealthy have been avoiding tax for centuriesPaul, Bagshot class="" href="http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/thread.jspa?forumID=5335&edition=1&ttl=20080915142016">Send us your comments | |
Supporting Mr Harris, housing spokesman Paul Holmes said the party risked becoming a "Trojan horse" for those who wanted to "slash and burn" public spending if it backed the tax-cutting proposals. | |
He said Labour's investment in public services since 1997 had made a difference and the Lib Dems risked become too closely identified with Tory policies from the 1980s if the party adopted the leadership's plans. | |
In the past, the party has campaigned for an extra 1p on the basic rate of income tax to pay for a better education system. | |
At the last general election it called for high earners to pay a 50p rate. | |
Speaking in the debate, Treasury spokesman Vince Cable said the promise of tax cuts was "progressive" and did not mean the party was less committed to tackling inequality. | |
"Struggling families are asking can you give us a bit more freedom to spend the money we have earned," he said. "Pensioners are saying can you give us a bit more freedom to spend the money we have saved." | |
At a fringe meeting earlier in the day, former leader Sir Menzies Campbell enthusiastically endorsed the tax plan. | |
Over the last two years, the Conservatives have consistently said they will not propose any "unfunded" tax cuts at the next election, while maintaining an aspiration to cut the overall burden of taxation in the future. | |