This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/7607481.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Review of police lawyer shooting Review of police lawyer shooting
(19 minutes later)
Allowing firearms officers to confer after the shooting of barrister Mark Saunders raised the possibility of collusion, the High Court has heard.Allowing firearms officers to confer after the shooting of barrister Mark Saunders raised the possibility of collusion, the High Court has heard.
Mr Saunders, 32, was shot after a siege in May during which he fired at police from his house in Chelsea, west London.Mr Saunders, 32, was shot after a siege in May during which he fired at police from his house in Chelsea, west London.
His family wants the judicial review to rule the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) investigation broke human rights laws.His family wants the judicial review to rule the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) investigation broke human rights laws.
The family also claims the IPCC failed to give sufficient information to them.The family also claims the IPCC failed to give sufficient information to them.
Tim Owen QC, representing Mr Saunders' sister Charlotte, told the court the issue was "whether the hitherto practice of permitting police officers to confer before and during the recording of their accounts" of the incident is compatible with human rights laws.Tim Owen QC, representing Mr Saunders' sister Charlotte, told the court the issue was "whether the hitherto practice of permitting police officers to confer before and during the recording of their accounts" of the incident is compatible with human rights laws.
Unlawful failureUnlawful failure
He said: "The officers were not separated before their accounts were given and there was a delay in providing initial statements."He said: "The officers were not separated before their accounts were given and there was a delay in providing initial statements."
He said the IPCC had provided further opportunity to confer by organising meetings attended by groups of officers to put the questions to them.He said the IPCC had provided further opportunity to confer by organising meetings attended by groups of officers to put the questions to them.
Miss Saunders and her family are also seeking a declaration from Mr Justice Underhill that there has been an unlawful failure to disclose sufficient information about the investigation.Miss Saunders and her family are also seeking a declaration from Mr Justice Underhill that there has been an unlawful failure to disclose sufficient information about the investigation.
The IPCC practice of allowing officers to confer was agreed with the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) and is contained in the Acpo Manual of Guidance on the Police Use of Firearms. The IPCC practice of allowing officers to confer was agreed with the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) and is contained in the Acpo Manual of Guidance on the Police Use of Firearms. I have to question whether it was necessary to kill my brother Charlotte Saunders
The officers involved have not been interviewed
Mr Owen said the IPCC will argue at the hearing that until Acpo gives a direction to change the practice, it can do nothing.Mr Owen said the IPCC will argue at the hearing that until Acpo gives a direction to change the practice, it can do nothing.
But he added: "The IPCC is invested with sufficient powers to make a direction to the police authority to reverse the current practice to achieve a different approach which is capable of being compatible."But he added: "The IPCC is invested with sufficient powers to make a direction to the police authority to reverse the current practice to achieve a different approach which is capable of being compatible."
Mr Saunders, 32, died of multiple bullet wounds. A preliminary inquest heard he was shot in the head, the heart and the liver.Mr Saunders, 32, died of multiple bullet wounds. A preliminary inquest heard he was shot in the head, the heart and the liver.
As the siege unfolded, Mr Saunders threw a message to his wife, Elizabeth, from a window, suggesting a row between the couple may have sparked the incident.As the siege unfolded, Mr Saunders threw a message to his wife, Elizabeth, from a window, suggesting a row between the couple may have sparked the incident.
I have to question whether it was necessary to kill my brother Charlotte Saunders
Earlier, Ms Saunders told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I have to question whether it was necessary to kill my brother."Earlier, Ms Saunders told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I have to question whether it was necessary to kill my brother."
"Immediately after his first shot the police were called and the area evacuated, so there was no risk to the public. He was on his own, he had no hostage and made no demands."Immediately after his first shot the police were called and the area evacuated, so there was no risk to the public. He was on his own, he had no hostage and made no demands.
"So over the course of four or five hours with all the police training and technology, was there really no non-lethal method to overcome him?"So over the course of four or five hours with all the police training and technology, was there really no non-lethal method to overcome him?
"Four months on we still don't know what was in the minds of the officers who killed my brother."Four months on we still don't know what was in the minds of the officers who killed my brother.
"We have had very little information from the IPCC. What information we have got is from the press, so we know as much as anyone else.""We have had very little information from the IPCC. What information we have got is from the press, so we know as much as anyone else."
The IPCC has itself called on three separate occasions for the practice of allowing officers to confer to be ended.The IPCC has itself called on three separate occasions for the practice of allowing officers to confer to be ended.