This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/business/6212362.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Challenge over forced retirement Challenge over forced retirement
(about 8 hours later)
Anti-ageism campaigners will challenge the government in the High Court later over a law that allows employers to force workers into retirement.Anti-ageism campaigners will challenge the government in the High Court later over a law that allows employers to force workers into retirement.
The Heyday organisation, with the backing of Age Concern, will ask the High Court to look into the legality of the mandatory retirement ages. The Heyday organisation, with the backing of Age Concern, will ask the High Court to look into the legality of mandatory retirement ages.
Introduced in October with measures to outlaw ageism, mandatory retirement ages allow bosses to retire over-65s.Introduced in October with measures to outlaw ageism, mandatory retirement ages allow bosses to retire over-65s.
The government says it acted properly in implementing European rules.The government says it acted properly in implementing European rules.
The new age discrimination laws came into force in the UK in October in the biggest single change to employment practices in 30 years.The new age discrimination laws came into force in the UK in October in the biggest single change to employment practices in 30 years.
Europe question What the government had hoped with the default retirement age was that it would become a sort of voluntary agreement Sam MercerEmployers' Forum on Age
The new laws - the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 - are the result of a European directive on employment.The new laws - the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 - are the result of a European directive on employment.
They make it unlawful to discriminate against workers under the age of 65 on the grounds of age.They make it unlawful to discriminate against workers under the age of 65 on the grounds of age.
The rules affect recruitment, training, promotion, redundancy, retirement, pay and pension provision.The rules affect recruitment, training, promotion, redundancy, retirement, pay and pension provision.
But it will be argued in the High Court on Wednesday that the regulation fails to protect people over the age of 65 who still want to work.But it will be argued in the High Court on Wednesday that the regulation fails to protect people over the age of 65 who still want to work.
Heyday, which represents older people, believes the law contravenes the European Equal Treatment Directive by not giving pensioners the right to choose.Heyday, which represents older people, believes the law contravenes the European Equal Treatment Directive by not giving pensioners the right to choose.
It will also claim that the jobs of hundreds of thousands of people approaching retirement age could be better protected.It will also claim that the jobs of hundreds of thousands of people approaching retirement age could be better protected.
'Forced out'
Sam Mercer, from the Employers' Forum on Age, told BBC Five Live: "What the government had hoped with the default retirement age was that it would become a sort of voluntary agreement - employers and employees would have a grown-up conversation about how long they wanted to continue working.
"Now while that may be happening for some people, for others they're being forced out."
The government maintains it has fully and properly implemented the rules and has already promised to review the mandatory retirement ages in five years.The government maintains it has fully and properly implemented the rules and has already promised to review the mandatory retirement ages in five years.
But Heyday's action, if successful, could force ministers to act sooner.But Heyday's action, if successful, could force ministers to act sooner.