This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/feb/02/peter-dutton-criticised-for-subjecting-judges-to-quasi-election

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Peter Dutton criticised for ‘subjecting judges to quasi-election’ Peter Dutton criticised for ‘subjecting judges to quasi-election’
(11 days later)
Law Council says publicly releasing potential court appointees’ names is fraught with risk
Paul Karp
Fri 2 Feb 2018 04.26 GMT
Last modified on Fri 2 Feb 2018 04.28 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
The Law Council has denounced Peter Dutton’s suggestion of seeking public feedback before appointing judges as a “quasi-election” model that would politicise the judiciary.The Law Council has denounced Peter Dutton’s suggestion of seeking public feedback before appointing judges as a “quasi-election” model that would politicise the judiciary.
It is the second time the body has criticised the home affairs minister for undermining the independence of the judiciary after it rebuked him for claims that Victorians were “scared to go out to restaurants” due to street violence and that “civil libertarian” judges were to blame for lenient sentences.It is the second time the body has criticised the home affairs minister for undermining the independence of the judiciary after it rebuked him for claims that Victorians were “scared to go out to restaurants” due to street violence and that “civil libertarian” judges were to blame for lenient sentences.
On Thursday, Dutton told 2GB Radio there should be “greater scrutiny” around appointments of magistrates and proposed that state governments should publish a list of potential appointments to the courts for public feedback.On Thursday, Dutton told 2GB Radio there should be “greater scrutiny” around appointments of magistrates and proposed that state governments should publish a list of potential appointments to the courts for public feedback.
The Law Council of Australia president, Morry Bailes, said that was “a perilous path to travel down”.The Law Council of Australia president, Morry Bailes, said that was “a perilous path to travel down”.
“Subjecting judges to a quasi-election risks politicising their role,” he said. “We have the separation of powers for very good reason.“Subjecting judges to a quasi-election risks politicising their role,” he said. “We have the separation of powers for very good reason.
“Judges are not appointed to make decisions based on political popularity, they are appointed to make judgments based on the facts in front of them and the law as it is written.”“Judges are not appointed to make decisions based on political popularity, they are appointed to make judgments based on the facts in front of them and the law as it is written.”
Bailes said that to ensure a “healthy functioning democracy”, there should never be “any blurring [of the lines] between the political and judicial spheres”.Bailes said that to ensure a “healthy functioning democracy”, there should never be “any blurring [of the lines] between the political and judicial spheres”.
“If we create an environment where judges are forced to act like politicians, we all lose.”“If we create an environment where judges are forced to act like politicians, we all lose.”
The shadow attorney-general, Mark Dreyfus, has labelled Dutton’s remarks “simply baffling” and said they were another inappropriate attack on the judiciary.The shadow attorney-general, Mark Dreyfus, has labelled Dutton’s remarks “simply baffling” and said they were another inappropriate attack on the judiciary.
“If he is talking about the direct election of judges, that proposal is probably unconstitutional,” he said.“If he is talking about the direct election of judges, that proposal is probably unconstitutional,” he said.
Dreyfus repeated a call for the new attorney general, Christian Porter, to stand up to Dutton, after saying he had been “missing in action while his colleagues make shocking attacks on the independence of the judiciary”.Dreyfus repeated a call for the new attorney general, Christian Porter, to stand up to Dutton, after saying he had been “missing in action while his colleagues make shocking attacks on the independence of the judiciary”.
In January, Porter said sentencing decisions and the “terrible elevation in violent gang-related offending in Victoria” meant it was “normal and reasonable” to expect a public debate there about criminal justice policy.In January, Porter said sentencing decisions and the “terrible elevation in violent gang-related offending in Victoria” meant it was “normal and reasonable” to expect a public debate there about criminal justice policy.
In comments to the Australian Financial Review on Friday, Porter rejected the view that Dutton’s statements constituted an attack on the judiciary.In comments to the Australian Financial Review on Friday, Porter rejected the view that Dutton’s statements constituted an attack on the judiciary.
“The long-standing, accepted practice is that in the exposition of free speech and open public debate, judicial decisions and reasoning and outcomes can be critiqued, and often robustly,” he is reported to have said.“The long-standing, accepted practice is that in the exposition of free speech and open public debate, judicial decisions and reasoning and outcomes can be critiqued, and often robustly,” he is reported to have said.
“But what you can’t and shouldn’t do is question the integrity, personal or process, of the courts.“But what you can’t and shouldn’t do is question the integrity, personal or process, of the courts.
“I don’t see that that line’s been over-stepped at the moment. Temperance and balance on both sides of the fence is warranted.”“I don’t see that that line’s been over-stepped at the moment. Temperance and balance on both sides of the fence is warranted.”
Australian lawAustralian law
Peter DuttonPeter Dutton
Australian politicsAustralian politics
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content