This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/jan/30/carillion-collapse-prompts-fresh-scrutiny-of-uk-accounting-giants

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Calls for more scrutiny of top accounting firms after Carillion collapse Calls for more scrutiny of top accounting firms after Carillion collapse
(about 5 hours later)
Head of industry’s watchdog says competition authorities should examine the sectorHead of industry’s watchdog says competition authorities should examine the sector
Julia KolleweJulia Kollewe
Tue 30 Jan 2018 15.36 GMTTue 30 Jan 2018 15.36 GMT
Last modified on Tue 30 Jan 2018 17.15 GMT Last modified on Tue 30 Jan 2018 22.01 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
Britain’s four biggest accountancy companies are facing fresh scrutiny, with the head of the industry watchdog calling for the competition regulator to investigate their auditing activities following the collapse of Carillion.Britain’s four biggest accountancy companies are facing fresh scrutiny, with the head of the industry watchdog calling for the competition regulator to investigate their auditing activities following the collapse of Carillion.
Stephen Haddrill, the chief executive of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), told MPs at a joint select committee hearing on Tuesday that “there should be more competition in the major accounting and audit area”.Stephen Haddrill, the chief executive of the Financial Reporting Council (FRC), told MPs at a joint select committee hearing on Tuesday that “there should be more competition in the major accounting and audit area”.
Haddrill said he would ask the Competition and Markets Authority to look at the sector again. In 2013, its predecessor, the Competition Commission, criticised the big four for their close relationships with chief executives.Haddrill said he would ask the Competition and Markets Authority to look at the sector again. In 2013, its predecessor, the Competition Commission, criticised the big four for their close relationships with chief executives.
He was responding to Frank Field, the Labour MP and chair of the work and pensions select committee, who asked whether KPMG, Deloitte, EY and PricewaterhouseCoopers should be broken up. It is conducting a joint enquiry with the business committee into Carillion’s collapse.He was responding to Frank Field, the Labour MP and chair of the work and pensions select committee, who asked whether KPMG, Deloitte, EY and PricewaterhouseCoopers should be broken up. It is conducting a joint enquiry with the business committee into Carillion’s collapse.
Field noted that two of the construction company’s recent finance directors had previously worked for KPMG and it had audited Carillion’s accounts for the past 19 years. “They are all mates, aren’t they?” he said.Field noted that two of the construction company’s recent finance directors had previously worked for KPMG and it had audited Carillion’s accounts for the past 19 years. “They are all mates, aren’t they?” he said.
The FRC has opened an investigation into KPMG’s auditing of Carillion’s accounts in recent years. The watchdog started closely monitoring the infrastructure company after it issued a surprise profit warning in July, Haddrill told MPs, but was unable to disclose this publicly because of confidentiality requirements. He agreed those rules needed to be reviewed.The FRC has opened an investigation into KPMG’s auditing of Carillion’s accounts in recent years. The watchdog started closely monitoring the infrastructure company after it issued a surprise profit warning in July, Haddrill told MPs, but was unable to disclose this publicly because of confidentiality requirements. He agreed those rules needed to be reviewed.
“There must be enormous cause for concern about the way the company was governed. We all look at what’s happened with a degree of incredulity, so we need to look on what basis the directors were making those decisions,” he said.“There must be enormous cause for concern about the way the company was governed. We all look at what’s happened with a degree of incredulity, so we need to look on what basis the directors were making those decisions,” he said.
Haddrill rejected MPs’ suggestions that the accounting watchdog was “toothless” but agreed that it needed more enforcement powers.Haddrill rejected MPs’ suggestions that the accounting watchdog was “toothless” but agreed that it needed more enforcement powers.
It also emerged that Carillion is unlikely to have “enough assets to meet even the cost of winding up the company”, according to Sarah Albon, the chief executive of the Insolvency Service. The group collapsed with £29m in the bank, a £1.3bn debt pile and a pension deficit of close to £1bn.It also emerged that Carillion is unlikely to have “enough assets to meet even the cost of winding up the company”, according to Sarah Albon, the chief executive of the Insolvency Service. The group collapsed with £29m in the bank, a £1.3bn debt pile and a pension deficit of close to £1bn.
Albon told MPs that Carillion was made up of 326 companies, 199 of them in the UK, with 169 directors. She said the Insolvency Service’s investigations normally took 21 months and it was putting “considerable resource” into the Carillion inquiry.Albon told MPs that Carillion was made up of 326 companies, 199 of them in the UK, with 169 directors. She said the Insolvency Service’s investigations normally took 21 months and it was putting “considerable resource” into the Carillion inquiry.
“One significant constraint is the incredibly poor standard of the company’s own record-keeping. It took some hours to identify how many directors we could potentially be targeting,” Albon said.“One significant constraint is the incredibly poor standard of the company’s own record-keeping. It took some hours to identify how many directors we could potentially be targeting,” Albon said.
MPs heard Carillion borrowed to continue to pay dividends, but cited cashflow problems when pension scheme trustees pushed it for higher contributions. According to a parliamentary briefing released last week, it paid out £217m more in dividends than it generated in cash between 2012 and 2016.MPs heard Carillion borrowed to continue to pay dividends, but cited cashflow problems when pension scheme trustees pushed it for higher contributions. According to a parliamentary briefing released last week, it paid out £217m more in dividends than it generated in cash between 2012 and 2016.
Robin Ellison, the chair of trustees of the Carillion defined benefit pension scheme, insisted they had been “as tough as we could be. We weren’t just sitting there playing patsy with the company”.Robin Ellison, the chair of trustees of the Carillion defined benefit pension scheme, insisted they had been “as tough as we could be. We weren’t just sitting there playing patsy with the company”.
He noted that the Pensions Regulator, which had had regular meetings with Carillion since 2008, could ask the company to make additional pension payments. “It would have been nice if they’d compelled the company to pay an additional £10m-15m contributions per year,” Ellison said.He noted that the Pensions Regulator, which had had regular meetings with Carillion since 2008, could ask the company to make additional pension payments. “It would have been nice if they’d compelled the company to pay an additional £10m-15m contributions per year,” Ellison said.
He told MPs he was called into a meeting with the Carillion board the day before the company went into compulsory liquidation. “They felt if they could get over the cashflow issue, by the end of the month they would have refinanced the company,” Ellison said.He told MPs he was called into a meeting with the Carillion board the day before the company went into compulsory liquidation. “They felt if they could get over the cashflow issue, by the end of the month they would have refinanced the company,” Ellison said.
“I believe that they believed that they had a plan for the survival of the company which was manageable. In the end it wasn’t.”“I believe that they believed that they had a plan for the survival of the company which was manageable. In the end it wasn’t.”
AccountancyAccountancy
CarillionCarillion
KPMGKPMG
PricewaterhouseCoopersPricewaterhouseCoopers
DeloitteDeloitte
EYEY
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content