This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/scotland/7596764.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Alexander facing parliament ban MSPs vote against Alexander ban
(1 day later)
Labour MSP Wendy Alexander is to learn if she will be banned from parliament after breaking Holyrood rules. Former Scottish Labour leader Wendy Alexander will not be banned from parliament for breaking Holyrood rules.
Ms Alexander quit as Scottish Labour leader after failing to declare donations to her leadership campaign on her MSP register of interests in time. Ms Alexander quit the job after failing to declare donations to her leadership campaign on her MSP register of interests in time.
All MSPs will be asked to vote on a recommendation that she is excluded from parliament for one day. MSPs voted against a recommendation to exclude her from parliament for one day by 70 votes to 49 with two abstentions.
The call came from Holyrood's standards committee, which investigated the claims against Ms Alexander. The result came after a heated debate, during which Holyrood's standards system was called into question.
The cross-party committee ruled in June that the Paisley North MSP should have declared several donations to her leadership campaign last summer on her register. Following the concerns, Holyrood Presiding Officer Alex Fergusson promised to review aspects of how parliament polices itself.
The recommendation for a ban was made by the parliament's standards committee, which investigated the claims against Ms Alexander, before the summer recess.
Today is a victory for the law, for natural justice and for common sense and I welcome that Wendy Alexander Read Brian Taylor's blogAlexander reacts to sanction voteHow MSPs voted in Alexander row
The cross-party committee ruled that the Paisley North MSP should have declared several donations to her leadership campaign last summer on her register.
Ms Alexander, who later updated the register, has insisted she always acted on advice from Holyrood officials.Ms Alexander, who later updated the register, has insisted she always acted on advice from Holyrood officials.
Scotland's former first minister, Jack McConnell, called on party bosses to allow their MSPs a free vote on the matter. She told BBC Scotland after the vote: "I welcome this decision. I said in June that my pursuers had sought political victory with little thought to the standing of the parliament and that I'd hope wiser heads would prevail.
MSPs will spend one hour debating the recommendation ahead of the vote, at 1700 BST. "They have done so today. Today is a victory for the law, for natural justice and for common sense and I welcome that."
Standards committee convener Keith Brown earlier told MSPs that Ms Alexander had failed to declare 10 donations above the £520 threshold within the 30-day deadline.
He said she had received written advice from the committee clerks that these donations did not need to be registered.
'Prejudice' fears
However, the SNP MSP added: "That advice was sought after the deadline for around half of the donations had passed."
Labour MSP Jackie Baillie, a close ally of Ms Alexander, said her colleague paid a high price for a report which some described as "partisan".
"Some in this chamber may regard what they have done as a political victory, but wiser heads will reflect on the consequences for this parliament and democracy," she said.
Nationalist MSP Christina McKelvie said MSPs had "an absolute responsibility" to register donations.
Ms Alexander said her pursuers sought only political victoryShe went on: "In the case that comes before us, there can be little doubt that the member at the heart of the report has still not accepted responsibility for her actions, or those taken in her name, and still seeks to avoid any sanction."
Standards committee member Jamie McGrigor said it had an air of "partisan alignment".
And he asked: "How many members in this chamber would feel comfortable to be judged by such a committee so lacking in parliamentary experience?
"I am proud of the fact that I based my judgement purely on the evidence before me without anyone from my party telling me what I should do."
Liberal Democrat Robert Brown said he was unhappy with the committee's conclusion that the episode gave the appearance of "prejudice" to a fair-minded and impartial observer.
"Would the non-registration of these donations really lead an informed member of the public to think Wendy Alexander was prejudiced by that fact?" he asked.
Green MSP Patrick Harvie said there was no clear reason to overturn the recommendation of the committee.
Meanwhile, Mr Fergusson said officials were looking at calls for guidance on the registration of gifts and the possibility of providing MSPs with private legal advice.
He also said the review would look at whether the system fully complied with human rights law.