This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/11/world/europe/russia-historian-psychiatric-testing.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Gulag Historian Ordered to Undergo Psychiatric Testing in Russia Gulag Historian Ordered to Undergo Psychiatric Testing in Russia
(35 minutes later)
MOSCOW — A Russian historian of the Gulag is scheduled to undergo enforced psychiatric testing this week, apparently having ruffled some official feathers because of his dedication to unearthing and publishing information about Stalin’s murderous rule. MOSCOW — A Russian historian of the Soviet-era system of forced labor camps known as the Gulag is scheduled to undergo enforced psychiatric testing this week, apparently having ruffled some official feathers because of his dedication to unearthing and publishing information about Stalin’s murderous rule.
The historian, Yuri A. Dmitriev, 61, who seemingly ran afoul of the Kremlin’s new emphasis on taking pride in Russia’s past, was arrested in December 2016 on charges of child pornography after taking nine naked photographs of his adoptive daughter, Natalya, then 11.The historian, Yuri A. Dmitriev, 61, who seemingly ran afoul of the Kremlin’s new emphasis on taking pride in Russia’s past, was arrested in December 2016 on charges of child pornography after taking nine naked photographs of his adoptive daughter, Natalya, then 11.
Mr. Dmitriev denied the photographs had anything to do with pornography, saying that he took them in case social care services accused him of beating her. He faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted.Mr. Dmitriev denied the photographs had anything to do with pornography, saying that he took them in case social care services accused him of beating her. He faces up to 15 years in prison if convicted.
At the end of December, an expert group found no pornographic content in the pictures, and the court, in Karelia, a region in northwestern Russia, refused to extend his detention beyond Jan. 28.At the end of December, an expert group found no pornographic content in the pictures, and the court, in Karelia, a region in northwestern Russia, refused to extend his detention beyond Jan. 28.
But at the same time, the court took a chapter from the Stalinist past, ordering that Mr. Dmitriev be sent to Moscow for psychiatric tests while also asking for a new review of the photographs by other experts.But at the same time, the court took a chapter from the Stalinist past, ordering that Mr. Dmitriev be sent to Moscow for psychiatric tests while also asking for a new review of the photographs by other experts.
Mr. Dmitriev has devoted the past 30 years to a search for mass graves of victims of Stalin’s purges. Together with his colleagues from Memorial, one of Russia’s oldest and most respected human rights organizations, in 1997 he discovered Sandormokh, where the remains of more than 9,000 victims were buried in communal pits.Mr. Dmitriev has devoted the past 30 years to a search for mass graves of victims of Stalin’s purges. Together with his colleagues from Memorial, one of Russia’s oldest and most respected human rights organizations, in 1997 he discovered Sandormokh, where the remains of more than 9,000 victims were buried in communal pits.
Over the years, the site has been transformed into a memorial with several monuments and a small wooden chapel. A day of remembrance is celebrated at Sandormokh every year on Aug. 5.Over the years, the site has been transformed into a memorial with several monuments and a small wooden chapel. A day of remembrance is celebrated at Sandormokh every year on Aug. 5.
Nikita Khrushchev famously denounced Stalin in a 1956 speech to a Communist Party gathering in which he detailed the dictator’s crimes. After the fall of Communism, a more honest examination of Soviet history was tolerated, though not always encouraged. Nikita S. Khrushchev famously denounced Stalin in a 1956 speech to a Communist Party gathering in which he detailed the dictator’s crimes. After the fall of Communism, a more honest examination of Soviet history was tolerated, though not always encouraged.
So at first, the local government supported the effort, with officials attending the memorial events. But official attitudes have been changing lately, particularly as Russia and the West have descended into a new Cold War prompted by the annexation of Crimea and the conflict in Ukraine.So at first, the local government supported the effort, with officials attending the memorial events. But official attitudes have been changing lately, particularly as Russia and the West have descended into a new Cold War prompted by the annexation of Crimea and the conflict in Ukraine.
Last year, President Vladimir V. Putin, who has made the rebuilding of national Russian pride a cornerstone of his rule, said that “excessive demonization of Stalin is one of the ways to attack the Soviet Union, Russia.”Last year, President Vladimir V. Putin, who has made the rebuilding of national Russian pride a cornerstone of his rule, said that “excessive demonization of Stalin is one of the ways to attack the Soviet Union, Russia.”
As state-owned television channels began to glorify the Soviet past and promoted the image of Russia as a besieged nation surrounded by enemies, memories of past crimes committed by the Soviet state were suddenly unwelcome.As state-owned television channels began to glorify the Soviet past and promoted the image of Russia as a besieged nation surrounded by enemies, memories of past crimes committed by the Soviet state were suddenly unwelcome.
“The authorities thought, ‘Why do so many people come to Sandormokh every year to pay tribute to victims of Stalin’s purges,’ ” said Anatoli Y. Razumov, another Gulag historian and Mr. Dmitriev’s friend. “A decision was made to silence the sites of Soviet crimes.”“The authorities thought, ‘Why do so many people come to Sandormokh every year to pay tribute to victims of Stalin’s purges,’ ” said Anatoli Y. Razumov, another Gulag historian and Mr. Dmitriev’s friend. “A decision was made to silence the sites of Soviet crimes.”
At the end of December, Aleksandr V. Bortnikov, the head of Russia’s Federal Security Service, a successor to the Soviet K.G.B., said in an interview to Rossiyskaya Gazeta, a government-run daily newspaper, that “archive materials show that there was an objective side in a significant number of criminal cases” opened during Stalin’s purges.At the end of December, Aleksandr V. Bortnikov, the head of Russia’s Federal Security Service, a successor to the Soviet K.G.B., said in an interview to Rossiyskaya Gazeta, a government-run daily newspaper, that “archive materials show that there was an objective side in a significant number of criminal cases” opened during Stalin’s purges.
Months before Mr. Dmitriev’s arrest, a number of government-friendly news outlets published articles by historians who suggested that Sandormokh could also be the site of a mass execution of Soviet Army servicemen by the Finns.Months before Mr. Dmitriev’s arrest, a number of government-friendly news outlets published articles by historians who suggested that Sandormokh could also be the site of a mass execution of Soviet Army servicemen by the Finns.
Mr. Razumov, among other historians, disputed the Finnish theory, saying that a similar tactic was used by the Soviet authorities when they tried to hide their crimes in the Katyn forest massacre and at other burial sites.Mr. Razumov, among other historians, disputed the Finnish theory, saying that a similar tactic was used by the Soviet authorities when they tried to hide their crimes in the Katyn forest massacre and at other burial sites.
Near the Russian city of Perm, a museum of a Soviet forced-labor camp was replaced by a state-run museum, and an annual memorial event was diluted. Near the Russian city of Perm, a museum of a Soviet forced labor camp was replaced by a state-run museum, and an annual memorial event was diluted.
In this toxic atmosphere, Mr. Dmitriev’s life’s work became increasingly problematic to the authorities. Despite testimony in his favor by his adoptive daughter and a parade of writers, actors, musicians, the court declined to throw out the case.In this toxic atmosphere, Mr. Dmitriev’s life’s work became increasingly problematic to the authorities. Despite testimony in his favor by his adoptive daughter and a parade of writers, actors, musicians, the court declined to throw out the case.
Viktor M. Anufriev, Mr. Dmitriev’s lawyer, said that someone in the government is refusing to let the case against Mr. Dmitriev be dismissed. Viktor M. Anufriev, Mr. Dmitriev’s lawyer, said that someone in the government was refusing to let the case against Mr. Dmitriev be dismissed.
“There is some force that wants to get the desired result,” Mr. Anufriev said. “Also, they kept him behind bars for a year. Someone will have to respond in case the charges will fall through.”“There is some force that wants to get the desired result,” Mr. Anufriev said. “Also, they kept him behind bars for a year. Someone will have to respond in case the charges will fall through.”