This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jan/10/aims-of-ethics-and-empire-project-werent-sexed-up
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Aims of Ethics and Empire project weren’t sexed-up | Aims of Ethics and Empire project weren’t sexed-up |
| (about 9 hours later) | |
| Letters | |
| Wed 10 Jan 2018 19.53 GMT | |
| Last modified on Wed 10 Jan 2018 22.00 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| Philip Murphy (Letters, 8 January) speculates that I “sexed-up” the aims of the “Ethics and Empire” project after reactions to my 30 November article on colonialism in the Times, “in order to suit a rightwing news agenda”. He goes on to wonder whether this embarrassed my colleague, John Darwin, into resigning. The truth of the matter is not nearly so exciting. The project was launched with a conference in July. After months of distraction, I finally got around to posting a description of it on the McDonald Centre’s website in early December. The text of the notice was identical to that which John and I had agreed 12 months earlier for other purposes – apart from some additional information about the July event. The reasons that John gave for resigning on 18 December were emphatically personal. Other people have confirmed that. I believe it. There is, of course, no end to the invention of conspiracy theories, and those with an ill will cannot be stopped from inventing them. But I can do no more to reassure Professor Murphy and others “who care about the integrity of Oxford scholarship” – unless, that is, he would like to come and inspect my email correspondence.Professor Nigel BiggarDirector, McDonald Centre for Theology, Ethics and Public Life, University of Oxford | Philip Murphy (Letters, 8 January) speculates that I “sexed-up” the aims of the “Ethics and Empire” project after reactions to my 30 November article on colonialism in the Times, “in order to suit a rightwing news agenda”. He goes on to wonder whether this embarrassed my colleague, John Darwin, into resigning. The truth of the matter is not nearly so exciting. The project was launched with a conference in July. After months of distraction, I finally got around to posting a description of it on the McDonald Centre’s website in early December. The text of the notice was identical to that which John and I had agreed 12 months earlier for other purposes – apart from some additional information about the July event. The reasons that John gave for resigning on 18 December were emphatically personal. Other people have confirmed that. I believe it. There is, of course, no end to the invention of conspiracy theories, and those with an ill will cannot be stopped from inventing them. But I can do no more to reassure Professor Murphy and others “who care about the integrity of Oxford scholarship” – unless, that is, he would like to come and inspect my email correspondence.Professor Nigel BiggarDirector, McDonald Centre for Theology, Ethics and Public Life, University of Oxford |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| British empire | |
| University of Oxford | |
| Higher education | |
| letters | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |