This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/09/north-carolina-republican-gerrymandering-judges-rule-illegal
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Partisan gerrymandering: Republican map of North Carolina ruled illegal | Partisan gerrymandering: Republican map of North Carolina ruled illegal |
| (6 days later) | |
| Federal judges rule ‘invidious partisanship’ violates the constitution, striking down Republican-drawn district map that gave GOP a rock-solid advantage | |
| Associated Press | |
| Wed 10 Jan 2018 02.47 GMT | |
| Last modified on Wed 10 Jan 2018 16.13 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| Federal judges ruled Tuesday that North Carolina’s congressional district map drawn by legislative Republicans is illegally gerrymandered because of excessive partisanship that gave the GOP a rock-solid advantage for most seats. | Federal judges ruled Tuesday that North Carolina’s congressional district map drawn by legislative Republicans is illegally gerrymandered because of excessive partisanship that gave the GOP a rock-solid advantage for most seats. |
| The ruling marks the second time this decade that the GOP’s congressional boundaries in the state have been thrown out by a three-judge panel. In 2016, another panel tossed out two majority black congressional districts initially drawn in 2011, saying there was no justification for using race as the predominant factor in forming them. The redrawn map was the basis for a new round of lawsuits. | The ruling marks the second time this decade that the GOP’s congressional boundaries in the state have been thrown out by a three-judge panel. In 2016, another panel tossed out two majority black congressional districts initially drawn in 2011, saying there was no justification for using race as the predominant factor in forming them. The redrawn map was the basis for a new round of lawsuits. |
| The latest lawsuit – filed by election advocacy groups and Democrats – said the replacement for the racial gerrymander also contained unlawful partisan gerrymanders. Those who sued argued that Republican legislators went too far when they followed criteria designed to retain the party’s 10-3 majority in the state delegation. | The latest lawsuit – filed by election advocacy groups and Democrats – said the replacement for the racial gerrymander also contained unlawful partisan gerrymanders. Those who sued argued that Republican legislators went too far when they followed criteria designed to retain the party’s 10-3 majority in the state delegation. |
| Tuesday’s ruling marks the first time a congressional plan was struck down on partisan gerrymandering claims, according to Allison Riggs, an attorney representing the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and other plaintiffs. | Tuesday’s ruling marks the first time a congressional plan was struck down on partisan gerrymandering claims, according to Allison Riggs, an attorney representing the League of Women Voters of North Carolina and other plaintiffs. |
| All three judges agreed the “invidious partisanship” in the plan violated the constitution’s equal protection provision and direction to the state to hold congressional elections because it took the power to elect their representatives away from the people. | All three judges agreed the “invidious partisanship” in the plan violated the constitution’s equal protection provision and direction to the state to hold congressional elections because it took the power to elect their representatives away from the people. |
| “We find that the general assembly drew and enacted the 2016 plan with intent to subordinate the interests of non-Republican voters and entrench Republican control of North Carolina’s congressional delegation,” US circuit court judge Jim Wynn wrote in the majority opinion. Wynn added that the evidence shows the “plan achieved the general assembly’s discriminatory partisan objective.” | “We find that the general assembly drew and enacted the 2016 plan with intent to subordinate the interests of non-Republican voters and entrench Republican control of North Carolina’s congressional delegation,” US circuit court judge Jim Wynn wrote in the majority opinion. Wynn added that the evidence shows the “plan achieved the general assembly’s discriminatory partisan objective.” |
| The judges ordered the general assembly to approve another set of districts by 24 January. Candidate filing for the November congressional elections begins 12 February, with primaries set for early May. A majority of the judges also agreed the panel would hire a redistricting expert to draw replacement boundaries if the legislature won’t. | The judges ordered the general assembly to approve another set of districts by 24 January. Candidate filing for the November congressional elections begins 12 February, with primaries set for early May. A majority of the judges also agreed the panel would hire a redistricting expert to draw replacement boundaries if the legislature won’t. |
| Through a spokeswoman, Senate Redistricting Committee chairman Ralph Hise of Mitchell County said lawmakers plan to appeal. | Through a spokeswoman, Senate Redistricting Committee chairman Ralph Hise of Mitchell County said lawmakers plan to appeal. |
| The districts “are fair and were drawn following all known rules, and existing case law,” state Republican party executive director Dallas Woodhouse said in a news release. | The districts “are fair and were drawn following all known rules, and existing case law,” state Republican party executive director Dallas Woodhouse said in a news release. |
| But Bob Phillips with Common Cause, which with other voters filed a lawsuit tried with the League of Women Voters’ case, said “politicians will no longer be allowed to use partisan gerrymandering in order to shield themselves from accountability to the public” if the ruling stands. | But Bob Phillips with Common Cause, which with other voters filed a lawsuit tried with the League of Women Voters’ case, said “politicians will no longer be allowed to use partisan gerrymandering in order to shield themselves from accountability to the public” if the ruling stands. |
| North Carolina | |
| Republicans | |
| US politics | |
| news | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |