This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/09/hacked-off-data-protection-bill-fail-victims-consumers
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 3 | Version 4 |
|---|---|
| Hacked and hacked off: without change this new data law will fail victims | Hacked and hacked off: without change this new data law will fail victims |
| (13 days later) | |
| Your name, your email address, your home address, your bank details, your credit or debit card details. You probably cannot count the number of times that you have been asked to share these important pieces of personal data with a company or organisation in the past weeks or months. As more and more of us report sharing an ever increasing volume of our personal information online, is enough being done to keep it safe? | Your name, your email address, your home address, your bank details, your credit or debit card details. You probably cannot count the number of times that you have been asked to share these important pieces of personal data with a company or organisation in the past weeks or months. As more and more of us report sharing an ever increasing volume of our personal information online, is enough being done to keep it safe? |
| The more information we share, the greater the risk there is of us falling victim to a data breach. While in some cases you may just need to update all your passwords, the loss of more important, personal data could have serious consequences, including leaving you at greater risk of being subject to fraud. Over the past year, we have seen reports of high-profile hacks of numerous organisations – Yahoo, Uber and Equifax to name just three. | The more information we share, the greater the risk there is of us falling victim to a data breach. While in some cases you may just need to update all your passwords, the loss of more important, personal data could have serious consequences, including leaving you at greater risk of being subject to fraud. Over the past year, we have seen reports of high-profile hacks of numerous organisations – Yahoo, Uber and Equifax to name just three. |
| There is still no system in place for consumers affected by a data breach to seek collective redress | There is still no system in place for consumers affected by a data breach to seek collective redress |
| More recently we have heard about the serious security flaw in Intel’s computer processors that could leave millions of people around the globe at risk of a data breach. It’s not surprising that in a recent study we found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of people were concerned that the information they had shared online could be at risk of a leak. | More recently we have heard about the serious security flaw in Intel’s computer processors that could leave millions of people around the globe at risk of a data breach. It’s not surprising that in a recent study we found that nearly three-quarters (73%) of people were concerned that the information they had shared online could be at risk of a leak. |
| Despite regular news about such massive hacks, there is still no system in place for consumers affected by a data breach to seek collective redress. Such a mechanism would allow for independent bodies to represent classes comprised of all consumers negatively impacted by a data breach, which hadn’t been properly handled by the organisation that held that data, whether or not the consumers were aware that they had been affected. This would streamline the process, implementing a time- and cost-efficient way to deliver effective justice for victims. | Despite regular news about such massive hacks, there is still no system in place for consumers affected by a data breach to seek collective redress. Such a mechanism would allow for independent bodies to represent classes comprised of all consumers negatively impacted by a data breach, which hadn’t been properly handled by the organisation that held that data, whether or not the consumers were aware that they had been affected. This would streamline the process, implementing a time- and cost-efficient way to deliver effective justice for victims. |
| At present, if a company does not offer you redress directly, it is only available through a lengthy and potentially expensive route that an individual would need to take via the courts. In addition, we recently found that as many as one in five people don’t know how to claim redress following a data breach. | At present, if a company does not offer you redress directly, it is only available through a lengthy and potentially expensive route that an individual would need to take via the courts. In addition, we recently found that as many as one in five people don’t know how to claim redress following a data breach. |
| The data protection bill is currently being debated in the House of Lords, which gives the government a unique opportunity to amend it to offer greater protection to consumers. In its current form it is inadequate for holding organisations to account when there is a breach of data laws, since it relies on individuals knowing they are affected, knowing their rights and proactively starting a claim or appointing a representative. | The data protection bill is currently being debated in the House of Lords, which gives the government a unique opportunity to amend it to offer greater protection to consumers. In its current form it is inadequate for holding organisations to account when there is a breach of data laws, since it relies on individuals knowing they are affected, knowing their rights and proactively starting a claim or appointing a representative. |
| It must be amended so that independent organisations acting in the public interest can help groups of affected consumers to get redress. The clock is ticking. The House of Lords must use this opportunity to support consumers’ ability to hold companies to account or risk shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. | It must be amended so that independent organisations acting in the public interest can help groups of affected consumers to get redress. The clock is ticking. The House of Lords must use this opportunity to support consumers’ ability to hold companies to account or risk shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. |
| • Alex Neill is managing director of home products and services at Which? | • Alex Neill is managing director of home products and services at Which? |
| Hacking | Hacking |
| Opinion | Opinion |
| Data and computer security | Data and computer security |
| Data protection | Data protection |
| House of Lords | House of Lords |
| comment | comment |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |