This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/02/us/politics/trump-clinton-huma-abedin.html

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
President Trump Threatens to Withhold Aid to Palestinians President Trump Threatens to Withhold Aid to Palestinians
(about 4 hours later)
WASHINGTON — President Trump weighed in Tuesday on the stalled Middle East peace process, saying that the Palestinian Authority was taking “hundreds of millions of dollars” in assistance from the United States while showing no “appreciation or respect,” a blunt, harsh criticism likely to escalate tensions.WASHINGTON — President Trump weighed in Tuesday on the stalled Middle East peace process, saying that the Palestinian Authority was taking “hundreds of millions of dollars” in assistance from the United States while showing no “appreciation or respect,” a blunt, harsh criticism likely to escalate tensions.
Mr. Trump’s comments represented a tougher tone toward the Palestinians than he has generally taken, suggesting that he is moving toward pressuring them to come to the table by threatening punishment rather than enticing them with promises of a deal that would benefit them.Mr. Trump’s comments represented a tougher tone toward the Palestinians than he has generally taken, suggesting that he is moving toward pressuring them to come to the table by threatening punishment rather than enticing them with promises of a deal that would benefit them.
He also chided the Palestinians for not trying to strike a peace agreement with Israel. “But with the Palestinians no longer willing to talk peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?” Mr. Trump said in Twitter messages on Tuesday evening.He also chided the Palestinians for not trying to strike a peace agreement with Israel. “But with the Palestinians no longer willing to talk peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?” Mr. Trump said in Twitter messages on Tuesday evening.
Last month, Mr. Trump formally declared Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and said that he still supported a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. But the Palestinians have said that Mr. Trump’s move did severe damage to the peace process.Last month, Mr. Trump formally declared Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and said that he still supported a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians. But the Palestinians have said that Mr. Trump’s move did severe damage to the peace process.
“With the Palestinians no longer willing to talk peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?” Mr. Trump said in Twitter messages on Tuesday evening.
In threatening to cut off aid to the Palestinians, Mr. Trump seemed to suggest that the United States has invested that money for future consideration at peace talks. But past administrations viewed aid to the Palestinians — more than $5 billion since the mid-1990s — as a way to keep the volatile situation from blowing up further, as it has in the past during two intifadas, or violent uprisings.In threatening to cut off aid to the Palestinians, Mr. Trump seemed to suggest that the United States has invested that money for future consideration at peace talks. But past administrations viewed aid to the Palestinians — more than $5 billion since the mid-1990s — as a way to keep the volatile situation from blowing up further, as it has in the past during two intifadas, or violent uprisings.
The Palestinians and Israelis cooperate on security to an extent, and the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, could curtail that in response to an aid cutoff, as he has periodically threatened to do. Such a move could complicate Israel’s ability to combat terrorism.The Palestinians and Israelis cooperate on security to an extent, and the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, could curtail that in response to an aid cutoff, as he has periodically threatened to do. Such a move could complicate Israel’s ability to combat terrorism.
Experts on the region have long expressed concern that allowing economic and social conditions in the West Bank to worsen by cutting off aid would encourage violence. In saying that he has “taken Jerusalem, the toughest part of the negotiation, off the table,” Mr. Trump has made it harder, not easier, for the Palestinians to bargain. To them, he seems to have pre-emptively ruled out one of their most important conditions for a final peace deal before negotiations even begin, that East Jerusalem would be their capital alongside the Israeli capital in West Jerusalem.Experts on the region have long expressed concern that allowing economic and social conditions in the West Bank to worsen by cutting off aid would encourage violence. In saying that he has “taken Jerusalem, the toughest part of the negotiation, off the table,” Mr. Trump has made it harder, not easier, for the Palestinians to bargain. To them, he seems to have pre-emptively ruled out one of their most important conditions for a final peace deal before negotiations even begin, that East Jerusalem would be their capital alongside the Israeli capital in West Jerusalem.
Until recently, even many Israeli officials assumed that a permanent resolution of the conflict would involve some sort of compromise on Jerusalem. Palestinian leaders fear a popular backlash if they agreed to talks in which Jerusalem was no longer even an issue for discussion.Until recently, even many Israeli officials assumed that a permanent resolution of the conflict would involve some sort of compromise on Jerusalem. Palestinian leaders fear a popular backlash if they agreed to talks in which Jerusalem was no longer even an issue for discussion.
“It’s more frustration, it seems to me, than any effective policy with a clear goal, and like so many of his foreign policy decisions, it is driven by domestic politics,” Aaron David Miller, a scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center in Washington, said of Mr. Trump’s comments. “Beating up on the U.N. or defunding the Palestinians played extremely well with his base constituency. He loses very little.”“It’s more frustration, it seems to me, than any effective policy with a clear goal, and like so many of his foreign policy decisions, it is driven by domestic politics,” Aaron David Miller, a scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center in Washington, said of Mr. Trump’s comments. “Beating up on the U.N. or defunding the Palestinians played extremely well with his base constituency. He loses very little.”