This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/dec/29/lord-adonis-quits-as-theresa-may-infrastructure-tsar-over-brexit

The article has changed 14 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Lord Adonis quits as Theresa May's infrastructure tsar over Brexit Lord Adonis quits as Theresa May's infrastructure tsar over Brexit
(35 minutes later)
Andrew Adonis, the former Labour minister, has resigned as chair of the government-backed National Infrastructure Commission in protest against Theresa May’s management of Brexit. Andrew Adonis, the former Labour minister, has resigned as chair of the government-backed National Infrastructure Commission in protest at Theresa May’s management of Brexit, describing the process as “a dangerous populist and nationalist spasm worthy of Donald Trump”.
The former transport secretary chairs the body that makes recommendations to the government on major projects such as high-speed rail link HS2. Most recently, he recommended that a million new homes be built in the “brain belt” spanning Oxford, Cambridge and Milton Keynes. The former transport secretary headed the body that makes recommendations to the government on projects such the high-speed rail link HS2. Most recently he recommended that 1m new homes be built in the “brain belt” spanning Oxford, Cambridge and Milton Keynes.
But Lord Adonis has become increasingly outspoken on a series of policy issues in recent months, including tuition fees and university vice-chancellors’ pay.
Andrew Adonis, a Europhile Labour peer who previously served as transport minister, was appointed chair of a cross-party national infrastructure commission in 2015.Andrew Adonis, a Europhile Labour peer who previously served as transport minister, was appointed chair of a cross-party national infrastructure commission in 2015.
He has resigned just two years later over the governments hardline Brexit policies, which he says are “causing a nervous breakdown in Whitehall”.He has resigned just two years later over the governments hardline Brexit policies, which he says are “causing a nervous breakdown in Whitehall”.
He has been an outspoken critic of plans to leave the European Union after the June 2016 referendum and pledged to "relentlessly oppose” the EU withdrawal bill in the Lords.He has been an outspoken critic of plans to leave the European Union after the June 2016 referendum and pledged to "relentlessly oppose” the EU withdrawal bill in the Lords.
Adonis is the son of a Greek-Cypriot postal worker and a trade unionist. He went to the fee-paying Kingham school in Oxfordshire before studying modern history at Oxford and gaining a doctorate.Adonis is the son of a Greek-Cypriot postal worker and a trade unionist. He went to the fee-paying Kingham school in Oxfordshire before studying modern history at Oxford and gaining a doctorate.
He worked for the Financial Times and later the Observer, where he often wrote on class and public services.He worked for the Financial Times and later the Observer, where he often wrote on class and public services.
Adonis was elected as a Social Democrat to Oxford city council in 1987 before serving for the Lib Dems until 1991. He was selected as a parliamentary candidate for the party in 1994.However, he joined the Labour party in 1995 after Blair removed clause 4 – a broad commitment to socialism – from its constitution.Adonis was elected as a Social Democrat to Oxford city council in 1987 before serving for the Lib Dems until 1991. He was selected as a parliamentary candidate for the party in 1994.However, he joined the Labour party in 1995 after Blair removed clause 4 – a broad commitment to socialism – from its constitution.
In 1998, following Labour’s landslide victory, he was appointed as an advisor to the Downing Street policy unit. In 2001, he was made its chair and was widely understood to be one of Blair’s key aides, credited as the mastermind behind many of the government’s flagship education policies.In 1998, following Labour’s landslide victory, he was appointed as an advisor to the Downing Street policy unit. In 2001, he was made its chair and was widely understood to be one of Blair’s key aides, credited as the mastermind behind many of the government’s flagship education policies.
He quit the policy unit in 2003 to work full time on a biography of the late Roy Jenkins, although he retained his post of senior policy adviser.He quit the policy unit in 2003 to work full time on a biography of the late Roy Jenkins, although he retained his post of senior policy adviser.
In 2005, he was awarded a peerage, becoming a government minister without ever having been elected to parliament.In 2005, he was awarded a peerage, becoming a government minister without ever having been elected to parliament.
He resigned with a strongly worded letter accusing the prime minster of becoming the “voice of Ukip” and pursuing policies that will leave Britain in “splendid isolation”. Lord Adonis has become increasingly outspoken on a series of policy issues in recent months, including tuition fees and vice-chancellors’ pay.
“I am afraid I must now step down because of fundamental differences on infrastructure and beyond which simply can’t be bridged.” He resigned with a strongly worded letter accusing the prime minister of becoming the “voice of Ukip” and pursuing policies that he said would leave Britain in “splendid isolation”.
A government source told the Press Association: “He’s been moving closer towards the exit door with each new onslaught he makes against Brexit. He’s now walked through the door before he was pushed.” “I am afraid I must now step down because of fundamental differences on infrastructure and beyond which simply can’t be bridged,” he said.
Full text of Adonis’s letter: Adonis said he would be “duty bound” to oppose the government’s EU withdrawal bill, which will reach the House of Lords in the new year. He described the bill the government’s flagship piece of Brexit legislation as “the worst legislation of my lifetime”.
He said Britain could have left the EU, abiding by the result of the 2016 referendum, “without rupturing our essential European trade and political relations”. Instead, the prime minister had “become the voice of Ukip and the extreme nationalist rightwing of your party.”
Adonis said he would have felt compelled to step down anyway over the “extraordinary” decision by the transport secretary, Chris Grayling, to bail out Stagecoach and Virgin on the East Coast rail franchise. “It is increasingly clear that the bailout is a nakedly political manoeuvre by Chris Grayling,” he said.
Grayling announced that a new partnership would take on responsibility for intercity trains and track operations on the route in 2020. Virgin Trains East Coast, involving Stagecoach and Sir Richard Branson’s Virgin, had previously agreed to pay the government £3.3bn to run the service until 2023.
Adonis said it was an “indefensible decision” and “the bailout will cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds, possibly billions”.
His departure, which was confirmed by officials at the commission, is the second by a senior Labour figure from a government-backed role, following Alan Milburn’s decision to step down as chair of the social mobility commission citing May’s failure to make progress on the issue.
Vince Cable, the leader of the Liberal Democrats, expressed sadness about Adonis’s departure. “Lord Adonis is one of the most thoughtful politicians around. This is why he has so many friends and political admirers beyond the Labour party,” he said. “It is, then, a great shame that he is no longer leading Britain’s infrastructure programme. Yet he felt there was no other option but to resign because of the way Brexit has been so badly mishandled.
“Notably, he is deeply concerned by how the Conservative leadership has pandered to its right wing over the single market and customs union, leaving which will badly – and needlessly – damage our trade.”
It is unclear why Adonis chose now to resign. May made clear in her Tory conference speech in 2016 that she planned to take Britain out of the single market and the customs union.
Senior government sources played down the significance of his departure, claiming his position had been under threat over his recent habit of engaging in vehement Twitter spats.
They also cited his criticism of government policy. “He’s been moving closer to the exit door with each new onslaught he makes against Brexit,” they said.
Adonis was an adviser to Tony Blair before being given a peerage and a ministerial role. He was a key driver of the decision to impose tuition fees on university students, but he has been strongly critical of recent changes to the scheme.
The large-scale infrastructure projects championed by Adonis are likely to go ahead without his chairmanship, as his approach is shared by the chancellor, Philip Hammond, who is keen to boost investment to offset the impact of Brexit on the economy.
Full text of Adonis’s letter
Dear prime minister,Dear prime minister,
The hardest thing in politics is to bring about lasting change for the better, and I believe in co-operation across parties to achieve it. The hardest thing in politics is to bring about lasting change for the better, and I believe in cooperation across parties to achieve it.
In this spirit I was glad to accept reappointment last year as chair of the independent National Infrastructure Commission, when you also reaffirmed your support for HS2, which will help overcome England’s north-south divide when it opens in just eight years time. I would like to thank you for your courtesy in our personal dealings. In this spirit I was glad to accept reappointment last year as chair of the independent National Infrastructure Commission, when you also reaffirmed your support for HS2, which will help overcome England’s north-south divide when it opens in just eight years’ time. I would like to thank you for your courtesy in our personal dealings.
The Commission has done good work in the past 27 months, thanks to dedicated public servants and commissioners. Sir John Armitt, my deputy chair, and Phil Graham, chief executive, have been brilliant throughout. I am particularly proud of our plans for equipping the UK with world-class 4G and 5G mobile systems; for Crossrail 2 in London and HS3 to link the Northern cities; and for transformational housing growth in the Oxford-Milton Keynes-Cambridge corridor. The commission has done good work in the past 27 months, thanks to dedicated public servants and commissioners. Sir John Armitt, my deputy chair, and Phil Graham, chief executive, have been brilliant throughout. I am particularly proud of our plans for equipping the UK with world-class 4G and 5G mobile systems; for Crossrail 2 in London and HS3 to link the northern cities; and for transformational housing growth in the Oxford-Milton Keynes-Cambridge corridor.
I hope these plans are implemented without delay. However, my work at the Commission has become increasingly clouded by disagreement with the government, and after much consideration I am writing to resign because of fundamental differences which simply cannot be bridged. I hope these plans are implemented without delay. However, my work at the commission has become increasingly clouded by disagreement with the government, and after much consideration I am writing to resign because of fundamental differences which simply cannot be bridged.
The European Union withdrawal bill is the worst legislation of my lifetime. It arrives soon in the House of Lords and I feel duty bound to oppose it relentlessly from the Labour benches.The European Union withdrawal bill is the worst legislation of my lifetime. It arrives soon in the House of Lords and I feel duty bound to oppose it relentlessly from the Labour benches.
Brexit is a populist and nationalist spasm worthy of Donald Trump. After the narrow referendum vote, a form of associate membership of the EU might have been attempted without rupturing Britain’s key trading and political alliances. Instead, by allying with Ukip and the Tory hard right to wrench Britain out of the key economic and political institutions of modern Europe, you are pursuing a course fraught with danger.Brexit is a populist and nationalist spasm worthy of Donald Trump. After the narrow referendum vote, a form of associate membership of the EU might have been attempted without rupturing Britain’s key trading and political alliances. Instead, by allying with Ukip and the Tory hard right to wrench Britain out of the key economic and political institutions of modern Europe, you are pursuing a course fraught with danger.
Even within Ireland, there are set to be barriers between people and trade. If Brexit happens, taking us back into Europe will become the mission of our children’s generation, who will marvel at your acts of destruction.Even within Ireland, there are set to be barriers between people and trade. If Brexit happens, taking us back into Europe will become the mission of our children’s generation, who will marvel at your acts of destruction.
A responsible government would be leading the British people to stay in Europe while also tackling, with massive vigour, the social and economic problems within Britain which contributed to the Brexit vote. Unfortunately, your policy is the reverse.A responsible government would be leading the British people to stay in Europe while also tackling, with massive vigour, the social and economic problems within Britain which contributed to the Brexit vote. Unfortunately, your policy is the reverse.
The government is hurtling towards the EU’s emergency exit with no credible plan for the future of British trade and European co-operation, all the while ignoring – beyond soundbites and inadequate programmes – the crises of housing, education, the NHS, and social and regional inequality which are undermining the fabric of our nation and feeding a populist surge. The government is hurtling towards the EU’s emergency exit with no credible plan for the future of British trade and European cooperation, all the while ignoring – beyond soundbites and inadequate programmes – the crises of housing, education, the NHS and social and regional inequality which are undermining the fabric of our nation and feeding a populist surge.
What Britain needs in 2018 is a radically reforming government in the tradition of Attlee, working tirelessly to eradicate social problems while strengthening Britain’s international alliances. This is a cause I have long advocated, and acted upon in government, and I intend to pursue it with all the energy I can muster.What Britain needs in 2018 is a radically reforming government in the tradition of Attlee, working tirelessly to eradicate social problems while strengthening Britain’s international alliances. This is a cause I have long advocated, and acted upon in government, and I intend to pursue it with all the energy I can muster.
Britain must be deeply engaged, responsible and consistent as a European power. When in times past we have isolated ourselves from the continent in the name of “empire” or “sovereignty”, we were soon sucked back in. This will inevitably happen again, given our power, trade, democratic values and sheer geography. Putin and the rise of authoritarian nationalism in Poland and Hungry are flashing red lights. As Edmund Burke so wisely wrote, “People will not look forwards to posterity who do not look backwards to their ancestors.” Britain must be deeply engaged, responsible and consistent as a European power. When in times past we have isolated ourselves from the continent in the name of “empire” or “sovereignty”, we were soon sucked back in. This will inevitably happen again, given our power, trade, democratic values and sheer geography. Putin and the rise of authoritarian nationalism in Poland and Hungary are flashing red lights. As Edmund Burke so wisely wrote, “people will not look forwards to posterity who do not look backwards to their ancestors”.
However, I would have been obliged to resign from the Commission at this point anyway because of the transport secretary’s indefensible decision to bail out the Stagecoach/Virgin East Coast rail franchise. The bailout will cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds, possibly billions if other loss-making rail companies demand equal treatment. It benefits only the billionaire owners of these companies and their shareholders, while pushing rail fares still higher and threatening national infrastructure investment. It is even more inexcusable given the Brexit squeeze on public spending. However, I would have been obliged to resign from the commission at this point anyway because of the transport secretary’s indefensible decision to bail out the Stagecoach/Virgin East Coast rail franchise. The bailout will cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds, possibly billions if other loss-making rail companies demand equal treatment. It benefits only the billionaire owners of these companies and their shareholders, while pushing rail fares still higher and threatening national infrastructure investment. It is even more inexcusable given the Brexit squeeze on public spending.
The only rationale I can discern for the bailout is as a cynical political manoeuvre by Chris Grayling, a hard right Brexiteer, to avoid following my 2009 precedent when National Express defaulted on its obligations to the state for the same East Coast franchise because it too had overbid for the contract. I set up a successful public operator to take over East Coast services and banned National Express from bidding for new contracts. The same should have been done in this case. Yet, astonishingly, Stagecoach has not only been bailed out: it remains on the shortlist for the next three rail franchises. The only rationale I can discern for the bailout is as a cynical political manoeuvre by Chris Grayling, a hard-right Brexiteer, to avoid following my 2009 precedent when National Express defaulted on its obligations to the state for the same East Coast franchise because it too had overbid for the contract. I set up a successful public operator to take over East Coast services and banned National Express from bidding for new contracts. The same should have been done in this case. Yet, astonishingly, Stagecoach has not only been bailed out, it remains on the shortlist for the next three rail franchises.
The East Coast affair will inevitably come under close scrutiny by the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee, and I need to be free to set out serious public interest concerns. I hope the PAC calls Sir Richard Branson and Sir Brian Souter to give evidence. I am ready to share troubling evidence with the PAC and other parliamentary committees investigating the bailout. The East Coast affair will inevitably come under close scrutiny by the National Audit Office and the public accounts committee, and I need to be free to set out serious public interest concerns. I hope the PAC calls Sir Richard Branson and Sir Brian Souter to give evidence. I am ready to share troubling evidence with the PAC and other parliamentary committees investigating the bailout.
As you know, I raised these concerns with the chancellor and the transport secretary as soon as the bailout became apparent from the small print of an odd policy statement on 29 November majoring on reversing Beeching rail closures of the 1960s. I received no response from either Minister beyond inappropriate requests to desist. As you know, I raised these concerns with the chancellor and the transport secretary as soon as the bailout became apparent from the small print of an odd policy statement on 29 November majoring on reversing Beeching rail closures of the 1960s. I received no response from either minister beyond inappropriate requests to desist.
Brexit is causing a nervous breakdown across Whitehall and conduct unworthy of Her Majesty’s government. I am told, by those of longer experience, that it resembles Suez and the bitter industrial strife of the 1970s, both of which endangered not only national integrity but the authority of the state itself.Brexit is causing a nervous breakdown across Whitehall and conduct unworthy of Her Majesty’s government. I am told, by those of longer experience, that it resembles Suez and the bitter industrial strife of the 1970s, both of which endangered not only national integrity but the authority of the state itself.
You occupy one of the most powerful offices in the history of the world, the heir of Churchill, Attlee and Gladstone. Whatever our differences, I wish you well in guiding our national destiny at this critical time.You occupy one of the most powerful offices in the history of the world, the heir of Churchill, Attlee and Gladstone. Whatever our differences, I wish you well in guiding our national destiny at this critical time.
Yours sincerely, Andrew AdonisYours sincerely, Andrew Adonis