This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7591013.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Nimrod families take legal action Nimrod families take legal action
(about 11 hours later)
Relatives of some of the 14 servicemen killed when their RAF Nimrod plane exploded in Afghanistan in 2006 are set to sue the Ministry of Defence.Relatives of some of the 14 servicemen killed when their RAF Nimrod plane exploded in Afghanistan in 2006 are set to sue the Ministry of Defence.
A writ accusing the MoD of negligence, failing to minimise risk and a breach of the right to life is to be served on Monday.A writ accusing the MoD of negligence, failing to minimise risk and a breach of the right to life is to be served on Monday.
In May, a coroner ruled the Nimrod fleet, based at RAF Kinloss, had never been airworthy and should be grounded.In May, a coroner ruled the Nimrod fleet, based at RAF Kinloss, had never been airworthy and should be grounded.
The MoD said it "cannot comment on a potential lawsuit".The MoD said it "cannot comment on a potential lawsuit".
The Nimrod spy plane exploded on 2 September 2006, shortly after undergoing air-to-air refuelling.The Nimrod spy plane exploded on 2 September 2006, shortly after undergoing air-to-air refuelling.
The blast was caused by fuel leaking into a dry bay and igniting on contact with a hot air pipe.The blast was caused by fuel leaking into a dry bay and igniting on contact with a hot air pipe.
Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxford Andrew Walker, speaking on Sunday, said: "The aircraft was in my judgment never airworthy from the first release to service in 1969."Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxford Andrew Walker, speaking on Sunday, said: "The aircraft was in my judgment never airworthy from the first release to service in 1969."
The action is being brought by the families of Sgt Ben Knight, 25, and Flt Lt Steven Swarbrick, 28.The action is being brought by the families of Sgt Ben Knight, 25, and Flt Lt Steven Swarbrick, 28.
Flt Lt Knight's father Graham, 56, said Monday was the last chance for the families to launch the legal action, as it had to be carried out within two years of the accident - Tuesday will mark its second anniversary.Flt Lt Knight's father Graham, 56, said Monday was the last chance for the families to launch the legal action, as it had to be carried out within two years of the accident - Tuesday will mark its second anniversary.
"Nobody has been held accountable for the actual crash," he said."Nobody has been held accountable for the actual crash," he said.
"The government has stood up and said we are sorry. The coroner has said the aircraft was never airworthy but nobody in the RAF or MoD has ever been held accountable for it.""The government has stood up and said we are sorry. The coroner has said the aircraft was never airworthy but nobody in the RAF or MoD has ever been held accountable for it."
'Three-fold' action'Three-fold' action
The issuing of the writ to Defence Secretary Des Browne will be the first time the department has faced a legal challenge under the European Convention of Human Rights.The issuing of the writ to Defence Secretary Des Browne will be the first time the department has faced a legal challenge under the European Convention of Human Rights.
Barrister John Cooper, who is acting on behalf of two of the families, said the action was "three-fold".Barrister John Cooper, who is acting on behalf of two of the families, said the action was "three-fold".
We have ceased air-to-air refuelling and the use of very hot air systems when our Nimrod's are in flight MoDWe have ceased air-to-air refuelling and the use of very hot air systems when our Nimrod's are in flight MoD
"Firstly negligence - it is the families' argument that the Ministry of Defence had a duty to protect, so far as is practicable, the lives of service people and that they breached that duty," he said."Firstly negligence - it is the families' argument that the Ministry of Defence had a duty to protect, so far as is practicable, the lives of service people and that they breached that duty," he said.
"Secondly, breach of statutory duty under the Health and Safety at Work act 1974. This states that any employer should take steps as far as is reasonably practicable to minimise risk."Secondly, breach of statutory duty under the Health and Safety at Work act 1974. This states that any employer should take steps as far as is reasonably practicable to minimise risk.
"And thirdly, under Article Two of the European Convention on Human Rights.""And thirdly, under Article Two of the European Convention on Human Rights."
This principle asserts that an individual's right to life is protected under law.This principle asserts that an individual's right to life is protected under law.
He said there is "a duty on the government to protect life by minimising risk", adding that the claimants believe "the aeroplane was unairworthy and the Ministry of Defence should have known".He said there is "a duty on the government to protect life by minimising risk", adding that the claimants believe "the aeroplane was unairworthy and the Ministry of Defence should have known".
He said his clients "accept there is always risk in war" but felt "the design of Nimrod was fundamentally flawed".He said his clients "accept there is always risk in war" but felt "the design of Nimrod was fundamentally flawed".
'Safe to fly''Safe to fly'
The government has refused to agree with the coroner's recommendation that the entire Nimrod fleet be grounded.The government has refused to agree with the coroner's recommendation that the entire Nimrod fleet be grounded.
According to the MoD, new procedures mean the Nimrod aircraft is safe.According to the MoD, new procedures mean the Nimrod aircraft is safe.
The MoD said any lawsuit "would, of course, be addressed when presented".The MoD said any lawsuit "would, of course, be addressed when presented".
A spokeswoman said: "We have ceased air-to-air refuelling and the use of very hot air systems when our Nimrods are in flight.A spokeswoman said: "We have ceased air-to-air refuelling and the use of very hot air systems when our Nimrods are in flight.
"These measures, together with the enhanced aircraft maintenance and inspection procedures introduced, ensure the aircraft, as it is today, is safe to fly.""These measures, together with the enhanced aircraft maintenance and inspection procedures introduced, ensure the aircraft, as it is today, is safe to fly."