This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/nov/24/sports-direct-mike-ashley-brother-shareholder
The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Sports Direct seeks approval for £11m payout to Mike Ashley’s brother | Sports Direct seeks approval for £11m payout to Mike Ashley’s brother |
| (about 4 hours later) | |
| Sports Direct is seeking shareholder approval for an £11m payout to the brother of Mike Ashley, the company’s founder and majority shareholder, after an internal review into a controversial business deal concluded that he had been underpaid. | Sports Direct is seeking shareholder approval for an £11m payout to the brother of Mike Ashley, the company’s founder and majority shareholder, after an internal review into a controversial business deal concluded that he had been underpaid. |
| Last year, Sports Direct was heavily criticised by its own shareholders and corporate governance experts after it emerged the sportswear retailer was paying a company owned by John Ashley to deliver online orders outside the UK. The arrangement with Barlin Delivery Ltd, which was unwound earlier this year, had not been disclosed in Sports Direct’s annual report. | |
| On Friday morning, Sports Direct said it wanted to pay John Ashley £11m and would hold a special shareholder meeting on 13 December at which independent shareholders would be given the chance to approve the payout. Mike Ashley, the Newcastle United boss who owns nearly 61% of Sports Direct, will abstain from the vote but the statement made clear that he, and the rest of the retailer’s board, were supportive of the payout. | |
| Sports Direct said it wanted to make the additional payment after asking its law firm, RPC, to review John Ashley’s history with the company and the total “paid in money and in kind to John Ashley, which had been called into question given his position as brother of Mike Ashley”. | Sports Direct said it wanted to make the additional payment after asking its law firm, RPC, to review John Ashley’s history with the company and the total “paid in money and in kind to John Ashley, which had been called into question given his position as brother of Mike Ashley”. |
| John Ashley, a computer science graduate, built Sports Direct’s IT systems from scratch after joining his brother’s business in 1989. | John Ashley, a computer science graduate, built Sports Direct’s IT systems from scratch after joining his brother’s business in 1989. |
| In a statement to the Stock Exchange, Sports Direct said RPC’s review, conducted with accountants Smith & Williamson, had concluded that if John Ashley had been treated equally with other senior executives who had helped develop Sports Direct he would receive additional payments totalling about £11m. It said he had been denied this “because of concerns at the time about public relations”. | In a statement to the Stock Exchange, Sports Direct said RPC’s review, conducted with accountants Smith & Williamson, had concluded that if John Ashley had been treated equally with other senior executives who had helped develop Sports Direct he would receive additional payments totalling about £11m. It said he had been denied this “because of concerns at the time about public relations”. |
| The money deemed owed to John Ashley reportedly relates to a £5m bonus linked to Sports Direct’s 2007 flotation and a later performance-related share award worth £6.8m. | |
| Mike Ashley said in the statement: “I fully expect that independent shareholders will vote against this proposal due to the passage of time involved, although in my opinion, technically the money is owed and therefore should be paid. | Mike Ashley said in the statement: “I fully expect that independent shareholders will vote against this proposal due to the passage of time involved, although in my opinion, technically the money is owed and therefore should be paid. |
| “It’s important for me to say that if John had owed £1 to Sports Direct, I would have ensured any sum was repaid in full. I hope shareholders will therefore be reassured that everything is in order and that any concerns are laid to rest.” | “It’s important for me to say that if John had owed £1 to Sports Direct, I would have ensured any sum was repaid in full. I hope shareholders will therefore be reassured that everything is in order and that any concerns are laid to rest.” |
| When news of the contract with Barlin emerged, it spurred shareholder unease about corporate governance of Sports Direct that had already been fuelled by Mike Ashley’s decision to put his daughter’s boyfriend in charge of the firm’s property team. | |
| The company has also faced criticism over the treatment of workers and its business practices. Thousands of Sports Direct warehouse workers were awarded back pay totalling about £1m after a Guardian investigation revealed the company was effectively paying workers in its warehouse in Derbyshire below the minimum wage. | The company has also faced criticism over the treatment of workers and its business practices. Thousands of Sports Direct warehouse workers were awarded back pay totalling about £1m after a Guardian investigation revealed the company was effectively paying workers in its warehouse in Derbyshire below the minimum wage. |
| Steve Turner, the assistant general secretary of the Unite union, which has campaigned for better pay and conditions for Sports Direct workers, said some were still waiting for their share of back pay from the employment agency they were hired through. | |
| He said: “If Mike Ashley is so concerned about ensuring his brother gets the back pay he says he is entitled to, why not the agency workers at Sport Direct’s Shirebrook warehouse? | |
| “Many are yet to receive a portion of the back pay owed because of non-payment of the minimum wage and Sports Direct’s refusal to take responsibility and sort it out.” | |
| The company also said on Friday it wanted to approve a £3-a-share minimum payout to executives Karen Byers and Sean Nevitt – the only remaining participants in the Sports Direct executive bonus share scheme – if they elect to exercise their shares before September 2018, or £4 a share after that month. | |
| In the wake of the revelations about Barlin, independent shareholders last year voted out Sports Direct’s chairman, Keith Hellawell, but he stayed in his job with the backing of Mike Ashley. At this year’s annual shareholder meeting, independent shareholders narrowly backed Hellawell to remain in post. | In the wake of the revelations about Barlin, independent shareholders last year voted out Sports Direct’s chairman, Keith Hellawell, but he stayed in his job with the backing of Mike Ashley. At this year’s annual shareholder meeting, independent shareholders narrowly backed Hellawell to remain in post. |
| Sports Direct shareholder Royal London said it would not support the share deal for executives or the payout to John Ashley. | |
| Ashley Hamilton Claxton, the head of responsible investment at Royal London Asset Management, said: “If appropriate governance measures were in place at Sports Direct in the first place, there would have been a clear and transparent process for paying John Ashley what he was due and there would be no need to review his compensation after the fact.” | |
| It said Sports Direct had not provided evidence or detail explaining why the £11m was owed. |