This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/09/so-many-unanswered-questions-from-the-priti-patel-saga

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
So many unanswered questions from the Priti Patel saga So many unanswered questions from the Priti Patel saga
(2 months later)
Letters
Thu 9 Nov 2017 19.18 GMT
Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 14.01 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
There are huge inconsistencies in the Priti Patel and Israel affair (PM’s turmoil grows as Patel quits over Israeli meetings, 9 November). However much one disagrees with prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies, he is certainly a consummate politician. Are we really to believe that he would meet casually with a British cabinet minister during her holiday, without being assured that she was Theresa May’s envoy?There are huge inconsistencies in the Priti Patel and Israel affair (PM’s turmoil grows as Patel quits over Israeli meetings, 9 November). However much one disagrees with prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s policies, he is certainly a consummate politician. Are we really to believe that he would meet casually with a British cabinet minister during her holiday, without being assured that she was Theresa May’s envoy?
If not, then the inevitable outcome that has now unfolded ran too great a risk of damaging his relationship with the UK government. And would Lord Polak have had such a visible role alongside Patel’s holiday politics if he thought that it ran the risk of upsetting the Conservative government. Thus far, despite his decades-long role as the fixer for the highly influential Conservative Friends of Israel, he has been a shadowy figure. Would he really have emerged into the spotlight for such an improbable escapade?If not, then the inevitable outcome that has now unfolded ran too great a risk of damaging his relationship with the UK government. And would Lord Polak have had such a visible role alongside Patel’s holiday politics if he thought that it ran the risk of upsetting the Conservative government. Thus far, despite his decades-long role as the fixer for the highly influential Conservative Friends of Israel, he has been a shadowy figure. Would he really have emerged into the spotlight for such an improbable escapade?
The only explanation that matches the facts is that Patel was the fall guy for some secret diplomacy that May wanted to keep under cover.Michael MeadowcroftLeeds  The only explanation that matches the facts is that Patel was the fall guy for some secret diplomacy that May wanted to keep under cover.Michael MeadowcroftLeeds  
• Everything I’ve read or heard about Priti Patel’s resignation is saying it matters because it breaches the ministerial code, and the consequences are important in the domestic context (Brexit balance, etc). But we must try and imagine what it looks like in the Arab world, 100 years after Balfour. Take away the Westminster framing and we see blatant undermining of efforts to appear neutral in the unresolved conflict between Israel and Palestine. A cabinet minister was taking a holiday in Israel (bias enough, I would have thought), being led round by a known pro-Israel lobbyist, talking (and promising goodness knows what) to Israeli ministers and businesses, and meeting hardline prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And then off to the illegally occupied Golan Heights! We need to know what shifts in policy, what diversion of aid from Palestine, what recognition of illegal Israeli settlements and undermining of EU restrictions against import of goods from the settlements, she was trying to achieve.• Everything I’ve read or heard about Priti Patel’s resignation is saying it matters because it breaches the ministerial code, and the consequences are important in the domestic context (Brexit balance, etc). But we must try and imagine what it looks like in the Arab world, 100 years after Balfour. Take away the Westminster framing and we see blatant undermining of efforts to appear neutral in the unresolved conflict between Israel and Palestine. A cabinet minister was taking a holiday in Israel (bias enough, I would have thought), being led round by a known pro-Israel lobbyist, talking (and promising goodness knows what) to Israeli ministers and businesses, and meeting hardline prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. And then off to the illegally occupied Golan Heights! We need to know what shifts in policy, what diversion of aid from Palestine, what recognition of illegal Israeli settlements and undermining of EU restrictions against import of goods from the settlements, she was trying to achieve.
To cap it all, our own prime minister, in accepting Patel’s resignation, said that the UK and Israel were “close allies and should work closely together”. Allies against Palestine? Working closely together for Netanyahu’s illegal settlement expansions? Apology needed to all Palestinians, for this debacle as well as for Balfour.Nicholas HallYorkTo cap it all, our own prime minister, in accepting Patel’s resignation, said that the UK and Israel were “close allies and should work closely together”. Allies against Palestine? Working closely together for Netanyahu’s illegal settlement expansions? Apology needed to all Palestinians, for this debacle as well as for Balfour.Nicholas HallYork
• Can we have a re-evaluation of the word “fulsome”, as in the “fulsome apology” that Priti Patel’s resignation letter said she was offering to Theresa May and the government? My dictionary’s first options are related to “sickeningly” and “obsequious” and “nauseatingly affectionate”. Did she mean the opposite, perhaps, that her apology was “honest”?Martin LambSheffield• Can we have a re-evaluation of the word “fulsome”, as in the “fulsome apology” that Priti Patel’s resignation letter said she was offering to Theresa May and the government? My dictionary’s first options are related to “sickeningly” and “obsequious” and “nauseatingly affectionate”. Did she mean the opposite, perhaps, that her apology was “honest”?Martin LambSheffield
• The fact that Priti Patel had 12 meetings with foreign politicians, including one with Benjamin Netanyahu, without informing the Foreign Office, let alone the prime minister, and that she seems to be running her own foreign policy, shows she has great chutzpah indeed.• The fact that Priti Patel had 12 meetings with foreign politicians, including one with Benjamin Netanyahu, without informing the Foreign Office, let alone the prime minister, and that she seems to be running her own foreign policy, shows she has great chutzpah indeed.
As a humble civil servant back in the 1970s, I had to advise the head of my department if I was travelling on holiday to an eastern bloc country as the cold war was slowly beginning to thaw; and every week the head of information at No 10 would hold a meeting with information officers from across Whitehall to coordinate briefings and ensure everyone was aware of the main issues being announced that week. How times change.Angela CroftLondonAs a humble civil servant back in the 1970s, I had to advise the head of my department if I was travelling on holiday to an eastern bloc country as the cold war was slowly beginning to thaw; and every week the head of information at No 10 would hold a meeting with information officers from across Whitehall to coordinate briefings and ensure everyone was aware of the main issues being announced that week. How times change.Angela CroftLondon
• I am left wondering how No 10 knew nothing of Priti Patel’s visit to Israel. Our embassy in Cairo would have known of her presence in the country and would have commented on it in its regular report to the Foreign Office. The officer on the Middle East desk would have sent that information upstairs to the foreign secretary… who is also a contender for the Tory party leadership. Just a thought.KC GordonLlanllechid, Gwynedd• I am left wondering how No 10 knew nothing of Priti Patel’s visit to Israel. Our embassy in Cairo would have known of her presence in the country and would have commented on it in its regular report to the Foreign Office. The officer on the Middle East desk would have sent that information upstairs to the foreign secretary… who is also a contender for the Tory party leadership. Just a thought.KC GordonLlanllechid, Gwynedd
• I’m tired of watching the government implode in slow motion. Would someone kindly press fast-forward and just get it over with? It’s painful to watch and we’ve an awful lot to do.Anna FordLondon• I’m tired of watching the government implode in slow motion. Would someone kindly press fast-forward and just get it over with? It’s painful to watch and we’ve an awful lot to do.Anna FordLondon
• I hope that Priti Patel now has the chance of a proper holiday. She clearly didn’t get much time to relax during her last one, poor soul.Willie Montgomery StackNorwich• I hope that Priti Patel now has the chance of a proper holiday. She clearly didn’t get much time to relax during her last one, poor soul.Willie Montgomery StackNorwich
• The last woman to be recalled prematurely from Kenya became monarch.Philip HeseltonHull• The last woman to be recalled prematurely from Kenya became monarch.Philip HeseltonHull
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
Priti Patel
Conservatives
Theresa May
Israel
Palestinian territories
Boris Johnson
letters
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content