This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/20/world/united-nations-general-assembly.html

The article has changed 15 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
At U.N., Global Leaders to Speak After Trump Takes Center Stage At U.N., Global Leaders to Speak After Trump Takes Center Stage
(35 minutes later)
Global leaders are addressing the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday, after a memorable first day when President Trump delivered a pointed first address at the assembly and vowed to “totally destroy” North Korea if it threatened the United States or its allies.Global leaders are addressing the United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday, after a memorable first day when President Trump delivered a pointed first address at the assembly and vowed to “totally destroy” North Korea if it threatened the United States or its allies.
Mr. Trump went on to call Iran a “rogue nation” and denounced the nuclear deal with Tehran, a stance echoed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, who said in his own speech that Mr. Trump had “rightly called the nuclear deal with Iran an embarrassment.”Mr. Trump went on to call Iran a “rogue nation” and denounced the nuclear deal with Tehran, a stance echoed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, who said in his own speech that Mr. Trump had “rightly called the nuclear deal with Iran an embarrassment.”
Iran will has own chance to respond on Wednesday as President Hassan Rouhani takes to the lectern at the General Assembly. Iran had its own chance to respond on Wednesday as President Hassan Rouhani takes to the lectern at the General Assembly.
• Amid the anxiety over the risk of a nuclear conflict between North Korea and the United States, much of the rest of the world is embracing a treaty that bans nuclear weapons. It was opened for formal signature on Wednesday morning.• Amid the anxiety over the risk of a nuclear conflict between North Korea and the United States, much of the rest of the world is embracing a treaty that bans nuclear weapons. It was opened for formal signature on Wednesday morning.
• Sign up for the Morning Briefing for United Nations news and a regular look at what you need to know to begin your day.• Sign up for the Morning Briefing for United Nations news and a regular look at what you need to know to begin your day.
Leaders and diplomats from dozens of countries signed a treaty at the United Nations on Wednesday that will outlaw nuclear weapons — a document that disarmament advocates described as a historic first.
The world’s nine nuclear-armed countries, including the United States and North Korea, declined to sign the treaty, and the Americans and their allies denounced it as dangerously naïve.
The treaty, finalized in July by negotiators representing 120 of the 193 United Nations members, offered a stark contrast to the threats of mutual nuclear annihilation raised in the bombastic exchanges between North Korea’s regime and the Trump administration in recent weeks.
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, as it is officially known, will enter into legal force 90 days after being ratified by 50 countries.
“The treaty is an important step toward the universally held goal of a world free of nuclear weapons,” Secretary General António Guterres, who supported the negotiations, said at the ceremony held in the Trusteeship Council chamber.
President Michel Temer of Brazil was the first to formally sign the treaty, as other leaders and diplomats in the chamber applauded.
The United States and the other nuclear-armed states urged other countries not to sign it. The Americans in particular ridiculed it, arguing that North Korea and any other rogue entity with nuclear weapons would ignore its provisions.
In a statement issued before the signing ceremony, NATO denounced the treaty, saying it “disregards the realities of the increasingly challenging security environment.”
Supporters of the treaty said they had no expectation that nuclear-armed states would accept it at first. But they said they hoped that its widespread acceptance elsewhere would eventually increase the stigma of possessing such weapons because of their destructive power.
“This treaty is a clear indication that the majority of the world no longer accepts nuclear weapons and do not consider them legitimate weapons, creating the foundation of a new norm,” the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons said in a statement.
The treaty would outlaw the use, threat of use, testing, development, production, possession, transfer and stationing in a different country of nuclear weapons.
— RICK GLADSTONE
President Trump said on Wednesday that he had made a decision on whether to withdraw the United States from the nuclear agreement his predecessor negotiated with Iran, but declined to tell reporters what it was.
“I have decided,” he said, repeating the phrase three times. Pressed by reporters, he added, “I’ll let you know what the decision is.”
His comments, made as he met with President Mahmoud Abbas of the Palestinian Authority, came the day after he told the United Nations General Assembly that the deal was “an embarrassment for the United States.”
Under United States law, Mr. Trump has until Oct. 15 to certify whether Iran is complying with the agreement, which required it to dismantle much of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions. Mr. Trump has already certified Iran’s compliance twice, and most analysts said there was no cause to determine otherwise.
— PETER BAKER
Speaking to the General Assembly on Wednesday, President Hassan Rouhani of Iran praised the nuclear deal with his country as a “model.”
He argued that the Middle East was safer because of it, and said threats by the Trump administration “undermines international confidence in negotiating with it.”
“Imagine how the Middle East would have looked if the J.C.P.O.A. had not been concluded,” Mr. Rouhani said, using an acronym for the pact.
He also singled out “baseless” allegations made on Tuesday at the General Assembly, without naming anyone.
The nuclear deal, Mr. Rouhani said, has been widely applauded and endorsed by the Security Council. “As such it belongs to the international community in its entirety and not only to one or two countries,” he said, adding that the agreement “can be a new model for global interactions.”
— SOMINI SENGUPTA
President Trump is devoting his third day of international diplomacy in New York to a series of individual meetings with foreign leaders on Wednesday, mainly from the Arab world, as he seeks to rally a coalition in the Middle East against Iran.President Trump is devoting his third day of international diplomacy in New York to a series of individual meetings with foreign leaders on Wednesday, mainly from the Arab world, as he seeks to rally a coalition in the Middle East against Iran.
He started on Wednesday morning by getting together with King Abdullah II of Jordan, who has met with Mr. Trump several times already, including an encounter shortly after the inauguration when the king attended a Washington prayer breakfast to lobby the president not to move the United States embassy to Jerusalem.He started on Wednesday morning by getting together with King Abdullah II of Jordan, who has met with Mr. Trump several times already, including an encounter shortly after the inauguration when the king attended a Washington prayer breakfast to lobby the president not to move the United States embassy to Jerusalem.
The two expressed friendship on Wednesday. Mr. Trump praised the king for hosting so many Syrian refugees in his country and for combating terrorism. “He’s a very fine gentleman, a very nice man,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the start of the meeting. “He’s also a great, great fighter.”The two expressed friendship on Wednesday. Mr. Trump praised the king for hosting so many Syrian refugees in his country and for combating terrorism. “He’s a very fine gentleman, a very nice man,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the start of the meeting. “He’s also a great, great fighter.”
The king expressed solidarity. “We’re all fighting together,” he said, adding that terrorism “is a scourge” around the world. “Jordan will always stand beside you and your country.”The king expressed solidarity. “We’re all fighting together,” he said, adding that terrorism “is a scourge” around the world. “Jordan will always stand beside you and your country.”
Mr. Trump will meet later in the day with Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt. He also will host a luncheon with African leaders.Mr. Trump will meet later in the day with Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, Prime Minister Theresa May of Britain and President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt. He also will host a luncheon with African leaders.
– PETER BAKER– PETER BAKER
When negotiators representing two-thirds of the General Assembly celebrated in July as they finalized a treaty that would outlaw nuclear weapons, the world’s nine nuclear-armed states were not among them. And none of those states attended a formal signing ceremony on Wednesday at the United Nations.
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, as it is officially known, will enter into legal force 90 days after ratification by 50 countries.
“The treaty is an important step toward the universally held goal of a world free of nuclear weapons,” Secretary General António Guterres, who supported the negotiations, said in remarks at the ceremony held in the Trusteeship Council chamber.
President Michel Temer of Brazil was the first to formally sign the treaty, as other leaders and diplomats in the chamber applauded.
The United States and the other nuclear-armed states not only boycotted the negotiations, they sharply criticized the treaty’s premise and urged other countries not to sign it.
The Americans in particular ridiculed the treaty, arguing that North Korea and any other rogue entity in possession of nuclear weapons would ignore its provisions, rendering the prohibition meaningless.
In a statement issued before the signing ceremony, NATO denounced the treaty, saying it “disregards the realities of the increasingly challenging security environment.”
Proponents of the treaty said they had no expectation that nuclear-armed states would accept it at first. Rather, supporters said, they hoped that widespread acceptance of the treaty elsewhere would eventually increase the stigma of possessing such weapons because of their destructive power.
Like the treaties that banned chemical weapons, land mines and cluster munitions, the nuclear weapons treaty could change perceptions, supporters contend.
“This treaty is a clear indication that the majority of the world no longer accepts nuclear weapons and do not consider them legitimate weapons, creating the foundation of a new norm,” the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons said in a statement.
The treaty would outlaw the use, threat of use, testing, development, production, possession, transfer and stationing in a different country of nuclear weapons.
— RICK GLADSTONE
President Trump’s threat to destroy North Korea provoked a debate among scholars of international law about whether he had violated a tenet of the United Nations Charter.President Trump’s threat to destroy North Korea provoked a debate among scholars of international law about whether he had violated a tenet of the United Nations Charter.
Article 2(4) of the Charter says that countries should “refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force” against another country, and grants exceptions only for instances sanctioned by the Security Council or acts of self-defense.Article 2(4) of the Charter says that countries should “refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force” against another country, and grants exceptions only for instances sanctioned by the Security Council or acts of self-defense.
In this case, there was no authorization from the Security Council, so the question is: Was Mr. Trump justified on the basis of self-defense?In this case, there was no authorization from the Security Council, so the question is: Was Mr. Trump justified on the basis of self-defense?
John B. Bellinger III, who served as a legal adviser in the administration of George W. Bush, said that despite his “colorful” choice of words, Mr. Trump was on solid ground, invoking the self-defense argument.John B. Bellinger III, who served as a legal adviser in the administration of George W. Bush, said that despite his “colorful” choice of words, Mr. Trump was on solid ground, invoking the self-defense argument.
“His threat to destroy North Korea did not violate the U.N. Charter because he said that the United States would use force only ‘if the United States is forced to defend itself or its allies,’ ” Mr. Bellinger said by email. “The Charter specifically allows a U.N. member to use force in self-defense.”“His threat to destroy North Korea did not violate the U.N. Charter because he said that the United States would use force only ‘if the United States is forced to defend itself or its allies,’ ” Mr. Bellinger said by email. “The Charter specifically allows a U.N. member to use force in self-defense.”
Kevin Jon Heller, a law professor at the University of London, said he believed that Mr. Trump had overstepped.Kevin Jon Heller, a law professor at the University of London, said he believed that Mr. Trump had overstepped.
“The problem is that self-defense must always be proportionate to the armed attack, and Trump clearly threatened disproportionate force,” Mr. Heller argued. “Had he said a nuclear attack would require wiping North Korea off the face of the earth, that might have been a lawful threat. But he did not qualify the threat in any way; on the contrary, he suggested North Korea would have to be destroyed in response to any armed attack on the U.S. or its allies. That is an unlawful threat that violates Art. 2(4).” — SOMINI SENGUPTA “The problem is that self-defense must always be proportionate to the armed attack, and Trump clearly threatened disproportionate force,” Mr. Heller argued. “Had he said a nuclear attack would require wiping North Korea off the face of the earth, that might have been a lawful threat. But he did not qualify the threat in any way; on the contrary, he suggested North Korea would have to be destroyed in response to any armed attack on the U.S. or its allies. That is an unlawful threat that violates Art. 2(4).”
President Trump returned on Tuesday to the combative bombast he employed during his election campaign, declaring in his first address to the General Assembly, “We will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea” if the United States were forced to defend itself or its allies. — SOMINI SENGUPTA
He denounced North Korea and its leader, Kim Jong-un, saying the nation “threatens the entire world with unthinkable loss of life” as a result of its nuclear weapons program. “Rocket Man is on a suicide mission for himself,” he said, using a mocking nickname for Mr. Kim.
After condemning North Korea, Mr. Trump pivoted to the next “rogue nation” — Iran. He called the nuclear deal with Tehran “an embarrassment” that is “one of the worst and most one-sided transactions the United States has ever entered into.”
Mr. Trump has long portrayed Iran as a sponsor of terrorism and has suggested that the United States may abandon the 2015 deal negotiated by the Obama administration and five other major powers that limited Iran’s nuclear activities.
So far, Mr. Trump has grudgingly accepted the agreement, even as he has described it as a disgrace. “It is time for the entire world to join us in demanding that Iran’s government end its pursuit of death and destruction,” he said.
—RICK GLADSTONE and MEGAN SPECIA