This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/sep/15/malcolm-roberts-to-be-cross-examined-and-bring-expert-to-high-court-citizenship-case

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Malcolm Roberts to be cross-examined and bring expert to high court citizenship case Malcolm Roberts to be cross-examined and bring expert to high court citizenship case
(about 1 month later)
Court to ask One Nation senator whether he knew he was a British citizen on Thursday before 10 October hearing on eligibility of seven MPs and senators
Paul Karp
Fri 15 Sep 2017 04.04 BST
Last modified on Fri 15 Sep 2017 06.14 BST
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
The One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts will be cross-examined about whether he knew he was a British citizen and the case challenging his eligibility may also scrutinise his sister’s evidence, the court of disputed returns has heard.The One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts will be cross-examined about whether he knew he was a British citizen and the case challenging his eligibility may also scrutinise his sister’s evidence, the court of disputed returns has heard.
At a hearing in Canberra on Friday the chief justice, Susan Kiefel, appointed a friend of the court to test Roberts’s evidence and made orders for Roberts to submit expert legal advice on British citizenship law.At a hearing in Canberra on Friday the chief justice, Susan Kiefel, appointed a friend of the court to test Roberts’s evidence and made orders for Roberts to submit expert legal advice on British citizenship law.
The high court, sitting as the court of disputed returns, will hear legal argument on 10 October about the eligibility of Roberts, the deputy prime minister, Barnaby Joyce, senators Fiona Nash, Nick Xenophon and Matt Canavan, and former Greens senators Larissa Waters and Scott Ludlam.The high court, sitting as the court of disputed returns, will hear legal argument on 10 October about the eligibility of Roberts, the deputy prime minister, Barnaby Joyce, senators Fiona Nash, Nick Xenophon and Matt Canavan, and former Greens senators Larissa Waters and Scott Ludlam.
Roberts’s counsel, Richard Scheelings, told the court the One Nation senator intended to bring expert evidence to show his effort to renounce his British citizenship by email on 6 May 2016 was effective despite not being accompanied by a fee.Roberts’s counsel, Richard Scheelings, told the court the One Nation senator intended to bring expert evidence to show his effort to renounce his British citizenship by email on 6 May 2016 was effective despite not being accompanied by a fee.
Scheelings said Roberts had preliminary advice from British barrister Adrian Berry, a junior to the commonwealth’s expert, Laurie Fransman, but was seeking a more senior barrister.Scheelings said Roberts had preliminary advice from British barrister Adrian Berry, a junior to the commonwealth’s expert, Laurie Fransman, but was seeking a more senior barrister.
Kiefel said the process of finding an expert “should have been in train some time ago” and said the court’s “timetable had not been adhered to in a number of respects” by Roberts.Kiefel said the process of finding an expert “should have been in train some time ago” and said the court’s “timetable had not been adhered to in a number of respects” by Roberts.
Kiefel suggested that the commonwealth and Roberts’s experts should confer on exactly how their opinions differed to confine the legal issues in question, noting they “shouldn’t have far to walk” as they worked at the same chambers.Kiefel suggested that the commonwealth and Roberts’s experts should confer on exactly how their opinions differed to confine the legal issues in question, noting they “shouldn’t have far to walk” as they worked at the same chambers.
Justice Patrick Keane will hear cross-examination of Roberts and the two experts at a hearing on Thursday. Kiefel appointed senior counsel Stephen Lloyd as a friend of the court to test Roberts’s evidence at that hearing.Justice Patrick Keane will hear cross-examination of Roberts and the two experts at a hearing on Thursday. Kiefel appointed senior counsel Stephen Lloyd as a friend of the court to test Roberts’s evidence at that hearing.
The solicitor general, Stephen Donaghue, said he anticipated Lloyd would need to test Roberts’s evidence about his knowledge that he was a British citizen.The solicitor general, Stephen Donaghue, said he anticipated Lloyd would need to test Roberts’s evidence about his knowledge that he was a British citizen.
He also suggested Lloyd may need to cross-examine Roberts’s sister, who has given evidence supporting Roberts’s case, and to scrutinise what steps Roberts took to renounce his citizenship.He also suggested Lloyd may need to cross-examine Roberts’s sister, who has given evidence supporting Roberts’s case, and to scrutinise what steps Roberts took to renounce his citizenship.
In the case of Barnaby Joyce, Tony Windsor will be the “contradictor”, arguing Joyce was not eligible for election.In the case of Barnaby Joyce, Tony Windsor will be the “contradictor”, arguing Joyce was not eligible for election.
Donaghue submitted that the cases of senator Matt Canavan, Fiona Nash and Nick Xenophon were “materially indistinguishable” from Joyce’s, because they were all born in Australia and say they had no knowledge they acquired foreign citizenship by descent.Donaghue submitted that the cases of senator Matt Canavan, Fiona Nash and Nick Xenophon were “materially indistinguishable” from Joyce’s, because they were all born in Australia and say they had no knowledge they acquired foreign citizenship by descent.
Donaghue said it was “almost inevitable” those four cases would “stand or fall together”, although Kiefel noted the evidence was distinct in each case.Donaghue said it was “almost inevitable” those four cases would “stand or fall together”, although Kiefel noted the evidence was distinct in each case.
Windsor intends to bring evidence about French, German and United States citizenship law to show that the issue of citizenship by descent was understood to be a disqualification under section 44 of the constitution, possibly even at the time of federation.Windsor intends to bring evidence about French, German and United States citizenship law to show that the issue of citizenship by descent was understood to be a disqualification under section 44 of the constitution, possibly even at the time of federation.
Larissa Waters, who resigned along with her colleague Scott Ludlam, will submit that she was ineligible, but the commonwealth will argue that she was not disqualified by section 44. No other contradictors were appointed by the court.Larissa Waters, who resigned along with her colleague Scott Ludlam, will submit that she was ineligible, but the commonwealth will argue that she was not disqualified by section 44. No other contradictors were appointed by the court.
Malcolm RobertsMalcolm Roberts
Australian politicsAustralian politics
One NationOne Nation
Australian citizenshipAustralian citizenship
Australian lawAustralian law
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content