This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7532713.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Hacker loses extradition appeal Hacker loses extradition appeal
(41 minutes later)
A Briton accused of hacking into top secret military computers has lost a Law Lords appeal against being extradited to stand trial in the US.A Briton accused of hacking into top secret military computers has lost a Law Lords appeal against being extradited to stand trial in the US.
Gary McKinnon, 42, could face a life sentence if found guilty of gaining access to 97 American military and Nasa computers from his London home.Gary McKinnon, 42, could face a life sentence if found guilty of gaining access to 97 American military and Nasa computers from his London home.
Glasgow-born Mr McKinnon admits breaking into the computers but says he was trying to find information on UFOs. Glasgow-born Mr McKinnon has admitted breaking into the computers but said he was trying to find information on UFOs.
He lost his case at the High Court in 2006 before taking it to the Lords. His lawyers said they would apply to the European Court to stop his removal.
The US government says he committed a malicious crime - the biggest military computer hack ever. Mr McKinnon first lost his case at the High Court in 2006 before taking it to the highest court in the UK, the House of Lords. American officials involved in this case have stated that they want to see him 'fry' Gary McKinnon's lawyers
He is accused of hacking into the computers with the intention of intimidating the US government. He was arrested in 2002 but never charged in the UK.
The US government claims he committed a malicious crime - the biggest military computer hack ever.
A statement by solicitors for McKinnon, who was not at the Lords to hear the judgement, said: "Gary McKinnon is neither a terrorist nor a terrorist sympathiser.
"His case could have been properly dealt with by our own prosecuting authorities. We believe that the British government declined to prosecute him to enable the US government to make an example of him.
"American officials involved in this case have stated that they want to see him 'fry'.
"The consequences he faces if extradited are both disproportionate and intolerable."
'Computer nerd'
Their client is accused of hacking into the computers with the intention of intimidating the US government.
It alleges that between February 2001 and March 2002, he hacked into dozens of US Army, Navy, Air Force, and Department of Defense computers, as well as 16 Nasa computers.
Prosecutors say he altered and deleted files at a naval air station not long after the 11 September attacks in 2001, rendering critical systems inoperable.Prosecutors say he altered and deleted files at a naval air station not long after the 11 September attacks in 2001, rendering critical systems inoperable.
Mr McKinnon has admitted that he accessed computers in the US without authority. Mr McKinnon, who is unemployed, has admitted that he accessed computers in the US without authority.
But he has said he is just a computer nerd, whose motives were harmless and innocent. He denies any attempts at sabotage. But he has said he is merely a computer nerd, whose motives were harmless and innocent. He denies any attempts at sabotage.
He says he wanted to find evidence of UFOs that he believed was being held by the US authorities. He said he wanted to find evidence of UFOs he thought was being held by the US authorities, and to expose what he believed was a cover-up.
Repatriated
The Law Lords were told by Mr McKinnon's lawyers that extraditing him would be an abuse of proceedings.
US authorities had threatened him with a long jail sentence if he did not plead guilty, they said.
Without co-operation, the case could be treated as a terrorism case, which could result in up to a 60-year sentence in a maximum security prison should he be found guilty on all six indictments.
With co-operation, he would receive a lesser sentence of 37 to 46 months, be repatriated to the UK, where he could be released on parole and charges of "significantly damaging national security" would be dropped.
But Clare Montgomery QC, representing the Home Secretary, argued no threats were made, and the extradition should go ahead.