This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/essex/6194346.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Stansted expansion plan refused Stansted expansion plan refused
(about 1 hour later)
Expansion plans for Stansted Airport which could boost the number of passengers have been rejected. Expansion plans for Stansted Airport which could boost passenger numbers have been rejected and one objection was their effect on climate change.
Uttlesford District Council turned down BAA's planning application to extend the existing runway. Uttlesford Council turned down BAA's planning application to extend the existing runway.
The airport operator wanted to increase passenger numbers to 35m a year.The airport operator wanted to increase passenger numbers to 35m a year.
Councillors said they were concerned about the impact expansion would have on the local environment. BAA said it would appeal against the decision. Impact of expansion on climate change and the local environment concerned councillors. BAA said it would appeal against the decision.
Second runway
Terry Morgan, Stansted Airport's managing director, said the issue would be decided at a public inquiry.Terry Morgan, Stansted Airport's managing director, said the issue would be decided at a public inquiry.
He said BAA still wanted to build a second runway at Stansted and would make an application next year.He said BAA still wanted to build a second runway at Stansted and would make an application next year.
Uttlesford's planning officers' reasons for recommending refusal include the impact it would have on noise, air quality, road and rail networks and local quality of life. Climate change
They said economic benefits had not been demonstrated to be strong enough to outweigh other factors. Uttlesford's planning officers' other reasons for recommending refusal include the impact it would have on noise levels, air quality, road and rail networks and local quality of life.
They said economic benefits had not been demonstrated to be strong enough to outweigh all other factors.
A second runway at Stansted was contained in the government's 2003 Aviation White Paper, a review of which is due from the Department for Transport before the end of this year.A second runway at Stansted was contained in the government's 2003 Aviation White Paper, a review of which is due from the Department for Transport before the end of this year.
Local residents who have formed a Stop Stansted Expansion campaign said they were "absolutely delighted" by the decision.Local residents who have formed a Stop Stansted Expansion campaign said they were "absolutely delighted" by the decision.
Environmental campaigners hailed the decision as a benchmark saying it was the first time climate change had been listed as a reason for refusing a planning application.
"We are delighted by this local authority's decision," said a spokesman for Friends of the Earth.
"I think increasingly people are waking up to the threat of climate change. This decision is a fantastic sign that the public realises the need to do something."
Shadow aviation minister Julian Brazier said: "This result confirms the extent of local opposition to Stansted.
"We have to ask the wider question as to whether we should be predicting or providing for current growth rates in aviation, given the problems of climate change."