This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/26/eu-must-change-stance-to-protect-citizens-rights-say-lib-dems

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
EU must change stance to protect citizens' rights, say Lib Dems EU must change stance to protect citizens' rights, say Lib Dems
(6 months later)
European commission’s approach of ‘nothing is agreed till everything is agreed’ puts citizens’ rights at risk, party says
Jessica Elgot Political reporter
Wed 26 Jul 2017 13.58 BST
Last modified on Wed 20 Sep 2017 17.33 BST
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
EU citizens in the UK and Britons living in Europe will face a further 18 months of turmoil unless the European commission urgently changes its stance on agreeing an early deal on citizens’ rights, a former Lib Dem cabinet minister has warned.EU citizens in the UK and Britons living in Europe will face a further 18 months of turmoil unless the European commission urgently changes its stance on agreeing an early deal on citizens’ rights, a former Lib Dem cabinet minister has warned.
The party is writing to negotiators at the European commission and the European parliament, as well as Theresa May, to argue that they should allow for ringfencing of citizens’ rights to ensure any deal on EU citizens does not collapse if the UK and EU fail to reach an exit deal by the end of March 2019.The party is writing to negotiators at the European commission and the European parliament, as well as Theresa May, to argue that they should allow for ringfencing of citizens’ rights to ensure any deal on EU citizens does not collapse if the UK and EU fail to reach an exit deal by the end of March 2019.
In the strongest criticism yet from the pro-Europe party of the EU’s negotiating position, former energy secretary Ed Davey said the commission’s “nothing is agreed till everything is agreed” approach to citizens’ rights needed to change.In the strongest criticism yet from the pro-Europe party of the EU’s negotiating position, former energy secretary Ed Davey said the commission’s “nothing is agreed till everything is agreed” approach to citizens’ rights needed to change.
“The European commission must go back to EU capitals and ask for a new negotiating mandate. If it doesn’t try it could be almost as culpable as the Brexiteers for letting down European citizens,” Davey said.“The European commission must go back to EU capitals and ask for a new negotiating mandate. If it doesn’t try it could be almost as culpable as the Brexiteers for letting down European citizens,” Davey said.
Ringfencing would allow negotiations on EU citizens rights to carry on under a separate track and be agreed regardless of how the rest of the negotiations progress, so even if other negotiations fail, the rights of citizens could be decided early.Ringfencing would allow negotiations on EU citizens rights to carry on under a separate track and be agreed regardless of how the rest of the negotiations progress, so even if other negotiations fail, the rights of citizens could be decided early.
On Wednesday, the Brexit secretary, David Davis, said there was a “moral imperative” to reach a quick deal on the rights of European Union nationals in Britain and UK expats on the continent.On Wednesday, the Brexit secretary, David Davis, said there was a “moral imperative” to reach a quick deal on the rights of European Union nationals in Britain and UK expats on the continent.
However, there are fundamental disagreements on the role of the European court of justice, which Brussels has said should oversee the rights of EU nationals already in the UK, rather than the British courts.However, there are fundamental disagreements on the role of the European court of justice, which Brussels has said should oversee the rights of EU nationals already in the UK, rather than the British courts.
Davis said that was comparable to the US supreme court having a say over British law. “I don’t think anybody has ever argued that the British courts are anything other than trustworthy in terms of defending the rights of individuals,” Davis said, speaking on a visit to the Czech Republic.Davis said that was comparable to the US supreme court having a say over British law. “I don’t think anybody has ever argued that the British courts are anything other than trustworthy in terms of defending the rights of individuals,” Davis said, speaking on a visit to the Czech Republic.
The division over the jurisdiction of the European court cuts to the heart of the negotiations and is unlikely to be easily ringfenced.The division over the jurisdiction of the European court cuts to the heart of the negotiations and is unlikely to be easily ringfenced.
Divisions have also emerged over the UK’s desire to carry out criminal records checks on EU nationals who apply for settled status, which the EU said would be an “administrative burden” and “intrusive to people’s privacy”.Divisions have also emerged over the UK’s desire to carry out criminal records checks on EU nationals who apply for settled status, which the EU said would be an “administrative burden” and “intrusive to people’s privacy”.
The call to ringfence the issue of citizens’ rights has been backed by two of the main umbrella groups representing EU citizens in the UK, the3million and UK citizens group British in Europe.The call to ringfence the issue of citizens’ rights has been backed by two of the main umbrella groups representing EU citizens in the UK, the3million and UK citizens group British in Europe.
Davey said he had also been angered by the lack of consultation by the UK government with the two groups – who he said had told him they had found the EU to be far more receptive.Davey said he had also been angered by the lack of consultation by the UK government with the two groups – who he said had told him they had found the EU to be far more receptive.
In a letter to May from Davey and the Lib Dem Brexit spokesman, Tom Brake, the MPs said they were shocked by the stark difference in approach. “We were told that whilst the commission reached out to these groups to consult on the offer they were proposing, the UK government simply held an information session once the aforementioned UK policy paper was complete,” the letter reads.In a letter to May from Davey and the Lib Dem Brexit spokesman, Tom Brake, the MPs said they were shocked by the stark difference in approach. “We were told that whilst the commission reached out to these groups to consult on the offer they were proposing, the UK government simply held an information session once the aforementioned UK policy paper was complete,” the letter reads.
The letter calls on Downing Street to urgently consult with the groups on the “strong moral, practical and legal reasons” for a ringfencing approach to EU citizens’ rights.The letter calls on Downing Street to urgently consult with the groups on the “strong moral, practical and legal reasons” for a ringfencing approach to EU citizens’ rights.
“The talk of a ‘no deal’, not least by the UK government, has added to people’s anxieties. They fear that ’no deal’ will mean that they will, by default, lose their rights.”“The talk of a ‘no deal’, not least by the UK government, has added to people’s anxieties. They fear that ’no deal’ will mean that they will, by default, lose their rights.”
Brexit
Immigration and asylum
European Union
Europe
Foreign policy
David Davis
news
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content