This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jul/13/the-guardian-view-on-liu-xiaobos-death-free-the-nobel-laureates-wife-now
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| The Guardian view on Liu Xiaobo’s death: free the Nobel laureate’s wife now | The Guardian view on Liu Xiaobo’s death: free the Nobel laureate’s wife now |
| (1 day later) | |
| Not since Nazi Germany had a country allowed a Nobel peace laureate to die in custody – until today. Liu Xiaobo was still held over his peaceful call for democratic reform, made almost nine years ago, when he died in hospital. That is China’s shame. But it is also a stain on the world’s conscience. Germany, to its credit, worked hard for his release; the US, Canada and EU said he should be allowed to leave China for treatment. But the only leader to make a personal, public call for his freedom was Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan. The Norwegian Nobel committee is right to lament the “belated, hesitant” reactions to news of his terminal illness. Governments weighed trade opportunities while Chinese citizens pressed his case at personal risk. | Not since Nazi Germany had a country allowed a Nobel peace laureate to die in custody – until today. Liu Xiaobo was still held over his peaceful call for democratic reform, made almost nine years ago, when he died in hospital. That is China’s shame. But it is also a stain on the world’s conscience. Germany, to its credit, worked hard for his release; the US, Canada and EU said he should be allowed to leave China for treatment. But the only leader to make a personal, public call for his freedom was Tsai Ing-wen of Taiwan. The Norwegian Nobel committee is right to lament the “belated, hesitant” reactions to news of his terminal illness. Governments weighed trade opportunities while Chinese citizens pressed his case at personal risk. |
| It is too late now. The empty chair left at the Nobel ceremony will never be occupied. The tardy and muted international response did not only let Mr Liu down. The author was exceptional in his intelligence, sustained courage and humanity: in his final statement to his trial, he insisted he had no enemies and no hatred. Mr Liu was an inspiration to those fighting for rights in China – even if the authorities erased him from the broader consciousness. But he also represented the lawyers, dissidents and campaigners who together carved out a greater space for expression and activism. His punitive sentence for “inciting subversion” in 2008 was a turning point. The ensuing crackdown has seen many more people detained and jailed and their families too have suffered. The international community has in general offered minimal protest, letting Beijing carry on without even the cost of embarrassment. China may throw the odd bone in return; it does not guarantee long-term nourishment. Indeed, the swift submission on human rights has told it that countries will cave on issues when enough pressure is applied. | It is too late now. The empty chair left at the Nobel ceremony will never be occupied. The tardy and muted international response did not only let Mr Liu down. The author was exceptional in his intelligence, sustained courage and humanity: in his final statement to his trial, he insisted he had no enemies and no hatred. Mr Liu was an inspiration to those fighting for rights in China – even if the authorities erased him from the broader consciousness. But he also represented the lawyers, dissidents and campaigners who together carved out a greater space for expression and activism. His punitive sentence for “inciting subversion” in 2008 was a turning point. The ensuing crackdown has seen many more people detained and jailed and their families too have suffered. The international community has in general offered minimal protest, letting Beijing carry on without even the cost of embarrassment. China may throw the odd bone in return; it does not guarantee long-term nourishment. Indeed, the swift submission on human rights has told it that countries will cave on issues when enough pressure is applied. |
| Mr Liu died under guard; his wife is not yet free. Liu Xia has committed no crime – even according to Beijing. But she has been held under house arrest since her husband’s Nobel win, devastating her physical and mental health. The prospects that authorities plan to leave her in this invisible prison to avoid further publicity are high. Rex Tillerson, the US secretary of state, has already urged China to let her go. The rest of the world should join him. | Mr Liu died under guard; his wife is not yet free. Liu Xia has committed no crime – even according to Beijing. But she has been held under house arrest since her husband’s Nobel win, devastating her physical and mental health. The prospects that authorities plan to leave her in this invisible prison to avoid further publicity are high. Rex Tillerson, the US secretary of state, has already urged China to let her go. The rest of the world should join him. |
| China | China |
| Opinion | Opinion |
| Liu Xiaobo | Liu Xiaobo |
| Asia Pacific | Asia Pacific |
| Freedom of speech | Freedom of speech |
| Human rights | Human rights |
| Rex Tillerson | Rex Tillerson |
| editorials | editorials |
| Share on Facebook | Share on Facebook |
| Share on Twitter | Share on Twitter |
| Share via Email | Share via Email |
| Share on LinkedIn | Share on LinkedIn |
| Share on Pinterest | Share on Pinterest |
| Share on Google+ | Share on Google+ |
| Share on WhatsApp | Share on WhatsApp |
| Share on Messenger | Share on Messenger |
| Reuse this content | Reuse this content |