This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jul/10/briton-wanted-in-us-for-loses-longest-running-extradition-fight-phillip-harkins
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Briton wanted in US for murder loses longest-running extradition fight | Briton wanted in US for murder loses longest-running extradition fight |
| (7 months later) | |
| European court of human rights rejects final appeal by Philip Harkins, of Scotland, who faces charge over fatal gun robbery | |
| Press Association | |
| Mon 10 Jul 2017 11.05 BST | |
| Last modified on Fri 14 Jul 2017 17.45 BST | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| A British man wanted for murder in the US has lost his long-running legal battle against extradition. | A British man wanted for murder in the US has lost his long-running legal battle against extradition. |
| Phillip Harkins, 38, has been fighting against his transfer to the US to face the charge since 2003 in what has been described as Britain’s longest-running extradition case. | Phillip Harkins, 38, has been fighting against his transfer to the US to face the charge since 2003 in what has been described as Britain’s longest-running extradition case. |
| The European court of human rights in Strasbourg rejected his final appeal on Monday. | The European court of human rights in Strasbourg rejected his final appeal on Monday. |
| Harkins had argued his extradition would violate articles three and six of the European convention on human rights, relating to inhuman or degrading treatment and the right to a fair trial. | Harkins had argued his extradition would violate articles three and six of the European convention on human rights, relating to inhuman or degrading treatment and the right to a fair trial. |
| His lawyers said that if convicted in Florida he would face a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. | His lawyers said that if convicted in Florida he would face a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. |
| The court declared both complaints inadmissible and said its decision was final. It also ruled an interim measure in place to stay Harkins’ extradition should be lifted. | The court declared both complaints inadmissible and said its decision was final. It also ruled an interim measure in place to stay Harkins’ extradition should be lifted. |
| Harkins, from Greenock, Inverclyde, was indicted for murder after Joshua Hayes was killed by a gunshot wound to the head during a robbery in Jacksonville, Florida, in 1999. | Harkins, from Greenock, Inverclyde, was indicted for murder after Joshua Hayes was killed by a gunshot wound to the head during a robbery in Jacksonville, Florida, in 1999. |
| He denied any involvement and has contested his extradition since it was requested by US authorities in March 2003. Harkins, who had been released on bail, returned to Scotland in 2002 but was jailed the following year for killing a woman in a road crash in Greenock. | He denied any involvement and has contested his extradition since it was requested by US authorities in March 2003. Harkins, who had been released on bail, returned to Scotland in 2002 but was jailed the following year for killing a woman in a road crash in Greenock. |
| After losing several attempts to block his extradition, he took his case to the ECHR, where an initial appeal failed in 2012. | After losing several attempts to block his extradition, he took his case to the ECHR, where an initial appeal failed in 2012. |
| He successfully petitioned for a final hearing but the court ruled the complaints should be declared inadmissible as they were “substantially the same” as those considered in 2012. | He successfully petitioned for a final hearing but the court ruled the complaints should be declared inadmissible as they were “substantially the same” as those considered in 2012. |
| Scotland | |
| Human rights | |
| European court of human rights | |
| Florida | |
| news | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |