This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/09/theresa-may-dup-deal-legal-challenge-crowdfunded-campaign-good-friday-agreement

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
May's deal with DUP faces legal challenge from crowdfunding campaign May's deal with DUP faces legal challenge from crowdfunding campaign
(35 minutes later)
A crowdfunding campaign has been launched to raise funds for a potential legal challenge to Theresa May’s parliamentary deal with the Democratic Unionist party, on the grounds that it breaches the Good Friday agreement.A crowdfunding campaign has been launched to raise funds for a potential legal challenge to Theresa May’s parliamentary deal with the Democratic Unionist party, on the grounds that it breaches the Good Friday agreement.
Ciaran McClean, the son of one of the founders of Northern Ireland’s civil rights movement, Paddy Joe McClean, is spearheading the challenge of the arrangement through which the DUP gained a £1bn aid package for the region.Ciaran McClean, the son of one of the founders of Northern Ireland’s civil rights movement, Paddy Joe McClean, is spearheading the challenge of the arrangement through which the DUP gained a £1bn aid package for the region.
The Green party activist believes the deal, which sees the Conservatives granted an overall majority with the support of the DUP’s 10 MPs, breaches both the landmark 1998 Good Friday agreement and the Bribery Act.The Green party activist believes the deal, which sees the Conservatives granted an overall majority with the support of the DUP’s 10 MPs, breaches both the landmark 1998 Good Friday agreement and the Bribery Act.
The confidence-and-supply arrangement, signed in Downing Street on 26 June, granted £1bn more funding for hospitals, schools and roads in Northern Ireland in return for DUP support in key Commons votes.The confidence-and-supply arrangement, signed in Downing Street on 26 June, granted £1bn more funding for hospitals, schools and roads in Northern Ireland in return for DUP support in key Commons votes.
Carwyn Jones, then the first minister of Wales, described the cash as a “straight bung to keep a weak prime minister and a faltering government in office”. The Scottish first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, characterised it as a “grubby, shameless” deal.Carwyn Jones, then the first minister of Wales, described the cash as a “straight bung to keep a weak prime minister and a faltering government in office”. The Scottish first minister, Nicola Sturgeon, characterised it as a “grubby, shameless” deal.
McClean is represented by Dominic Chambers QC of Edwin Coe LLP. Chambers was involved in the successful supreme court challenge to the government’s attempts to trigger article 50 without a Commons vote. McClean is represented by Dominic Chambers QC of Maitland Chambers. Chambers was involved in the successful supreme court challenge to the government’s attempts to trigger article 50 without a Commons vote.
McClean told the Guardian on Sunday that the government “has obligations under international law which are not being observed in this deal with the DUP”. He also argued that the arrangement could be construed as “a bribe to patch together a parliamentary majority”.McClean told the Guardian on Sunday that the government “has obligations under international law which are not being observed in this deal with the DUP”. He also argued that the arrangement could be construed as “a bribe to patch together a parliamentary majority”.
McClean, the Green candidate for West Tyrone in the last general election, denied that there would be major benefits to the region from the £1bn deal the DUP extracted from the Tories.McClean, the Green candidate for West Tyrone in the last general election, denied that there would be major benefits to the region from the £1bn deal the DUP extracted from the Tories.
“The £1bn bribe actually threatens the institutions in Northern Ireland. How can there be impartiality when one of the executive parties has the UK government over a barrel?“The £1bn bribe actually threatens the institutions in Northern Ireland. How can there be impartiality when one of the executive parties has the UK government over a barrel?
“This case is not being taken for nostalgia value. The DUP deal threatens to undermine our democracy in Northern Ireland, so it is important that citizens can challenge it,” he said.“This case is not being taken for nostalgia value. The DUP deal threatens to undermine our democracy in Northern Ireland, so it is important that citizens can challenge it,” he said.
The legal team aim to issue high court proceedings this week and will push for the case to be heard as early as possible. The judges, bruised by their experience over the Brexit case, are unlikely to welcome such a sensitive, political challenge but may be forced to deal with the claim. There has already been an exchange of letters over the issue between McClean’s lawyers and the government.The legal team aim to issue high court proceedings this week and will push for the case to be heard as early as possible. The judges, bruised by their experience over the Brexit case, are unlikely to welcome such a sensitive, political challenge but may be forced to deal with the claim. There has already been an exchange of letters over the issue between McClean’s lawyers and the government.
The basis of McClean’s claim is that any deal between the government and DUP is in breach of the 1998 Good Friday agreement, under which the government undertook to exercise its power in Northern Ireland “with rigorous impartiality on behalf of all the people in the diversity of their identities and traditions”. The government is trying to act as an honest broker in re-establishing the collapsed power-sharing executive at Stormont.The basis of McClean’s claim is that any deal between the government and DUP is in breach of the 1998 Good Friday agreement, under which the government undertook to exercise its power in Northern Ireland “with rigorous impartiality on behalf of all the people in the diversity of their identities and traditions”. The government is trying to act as an honest broker in re-establishing the collapsed power-sharing executive at Stormont.
The letter from Edwin Coe argues that any agreement between the DUP and the Conservatives would compromise the government’s independence and breach the reasonable expectation of the citizens of Northern Ireland, including McClean, that the government will act with rigorous impartiality. A letter from Edwin Coe solicitors argues that any agreement between the DUP and the Conservatives would compromise the government’s independence and breach the reasonable expectation of the citizens of Northern Ireland, including McClean, that the government will act with rigorous impartiality.
McClean writes on the action’s CrowdJustice webpage: “My claim is that as a citizen I expect my government to honour its obligations under the Good Friday agreement and not to bribe others with money so that it can stay in power. My lawyers have put these points to the government. They eventually responded, failing to meet deadlines they set themselves. Nothing they said addresses the fundamental issues behind this corrupt deal.”McClean writes on the action’s CrowdJustice webpage: “My claim is that as a citizen I expect my government to honour its obligations under the Good Friday agreement and not to bribe others with money so that it can stay in power. My lawyers have put these points to the government. They eventually responded, failing to meet deadlines they set themselves. Nothing they said addresses the fundamental issues behind this corrupt deal.”
David Greene, a senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: “This case is of huge public importance and demonstrates that individuals can call governments to account and the importance of that capability in a democracy.”David Greene, a senior partner at Edwin Coe, said: “This case is of huge public importance and demonstrates that individuals can call governments to account and the importance of that capability in a democracy.”
Crowdfunding is becoming an increasingly significant means of subsiding legal actions since deep cuts were introduced to legal aid in 2012.Crowdfunding is becoming an increasingly significant means of subsiding legal actions since deep cuts were introduced to legal aid in 2012.
Joanna Sidhu, a former City litigation lawyer who now works for CrowdJustice, said: “Having campaigned for peace in Northern Ireland for most of his life, Ciaran McClean is bringing this legal challenge to hold the government to account. By launching a crowdfunding campaign to support this challenge, Ciaran is giving everyone the opportunity to be part of the fight to preserve our democratic values.”Joanna Sidhu, a former City litigation lawyer who now works for CrowdJustice, said: “Having campaigned for peace in Northern Ireland for most of his life, Ciaran McClean is bringing this legal challenge to hold the government to account. By launching a crowdfunding campaign to support this challenge, Ciaran is giving everyone the opportunity to be part of the fight to preserve our democratic values.”
The initial aim is to raise £20,000 for legal fees but more will be needed if the case progresses to a full hearing in the high court. CrowdJustice has so far helped individuals and organisations raise more than £3m to fund more than 160 cases, three of which have reached the supreme court.The initial aim is to raise £20,000 for legal fees but more will be needed if the case progresses to a full hearing in the high court. CrowdJustice has so far helped individuals and organisations raise more than £3m to fund more than 160 cases, three of which have reached the supreme court.