This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jun/13/scientists-create-fake-tan-which-could-protect-against-skin-cancer

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Suntans for all: chemical causes any skin to tan – and protects against cancer Suntans for all: chemical causes any skin to tan – and protects against cancer
(about 1 month later)
Scientists create chemical that causes release of dark pigment in skin, creating a real ‘fake’ tan without the need for sunbathing
Hannah Devlin Science correspondent
Tue 13 Jun 2017 17.00 BST
Last modified on Mon 27 Nov 2017 22.45 GMT
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
Scientists have created the ultimate fake tan: a chemical that triggers the release of dark pigment in the skin without the need for sunbathing or a genetic predisposition for tanning.Scientists have created the ultimate fake tan: a chemical that triggers the release of dark pigment in the skin without the need for sunbathing or a genetic predisposition for tanning.
The substance would induce a tan even in fair individuals with the kind of skin that would naturally turn lobster pink rather than bronze in the sun, the scientists predicted.The substance would induce a tan even in fair individuals with the kind of skin that would naturally turn lobster pink rather than bronze in the sun, the scientists predicted.
“It would not actually be a fake tan, it would be the real thing,” said Professor David Fisher, who led the work at Massachusetts General Hospital. “It would just be sunless.”“It would not actually be a fake tan, it would be the real thing,” said Professor David Fisher, who led the work at Massachusetts General Hospital. “It would just be sunless.”
The product, which has so far only been tested on mice and skin samples in petri dishes, would no doubt be a welcome upgrade from the telltale orange hue of a spray tan. However, the scientists’ central motivation was coming up with more effective protection against skin cancer.The product, which has so far only been tested on mice and skin samples in petri dishes, would no doubt be a welcome upgrade from the telltale orange hue of a spray tan. However, the scientists’ central motivation was coming up with more effective protection against skin cancer.
People with dark skin tones, and those who tan easily, have a far lower risk of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer. The dark pigment, melanin, dissipates more than 99.9% of absorbed UV rays, limiting radiation damage to cells that can be the first step towards cancer.People with dark skin tones, and those who tan easily, have a far lower risk of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer. The dark pigment, melanin, dissipates more than 99.9% of absorbed UV rays, limiting radiation damage to cells that can be the first step towards cancer.
Whether a person tans or burns in the sun is dictated by which variant they carry of a gene called MC1R. In people who tan, this gene sets off a cascade of reactions during sun exposure that results in skin cells producing melanin. Redheads could, in theory, produce the pigment in their cells – it’s just that the chain reaction is never set in motion.Whether a person tans or burns in the sun is dictated by which variant they carry of a gene called MC1R. In people who tan, this gene sets off a cascade of reactions during sun exposure that results in skin cells producing melanin. Redheads could, in theory, produce the pigment in their cells – it’s just that the chain reaction is never set in motion.
The latest study, published in the journal Cell, found that a small molecule, called an SIK inhibitor, could be used to artificially switch the melanin production process on, at a point further down the chain from where the MC1R gene acts as a blockade.The latest study, published in the journal Cell, found that a small molecule, called an SIK inhibitor, could be used to artificially switch the melanin production process on, at a point further down the chain from where the MC1R gene acts as a blockade.
The researchers applied the chemical to a skin sample kept in a petri dish, and found that it darkened, with the tan lasting for days after the initial application. When ginger mice were treated, they turned almost jet black in a day or two with a strong enough dose, and were strongly protected against sunburn and skin cancer.The researchers applied the chemical to a skin sample kept in a petri dish, and found that it darkened, with the tan lasting for days after the initial application. When ginger mice were treated, they turned almost jet black in a day or two with a strong enough dose, and were strongly protected against sunburn and skin cancer.
The colour faded away over a week or so as skin cells sloughed off the surface, just as a normal tan would do, and aside from changing colour the mice did not suffer any obvious side-effects.The colour faded away over a week or so as skin cells sloughed off the surface, just as a normal tan would do, and aside from changing colour the mice did not suffer any obvious side-effects.
Fisher envisions artificial tanning being used in conjunction with normal sunscreen.Fisher envisions artificial tanning being used in conjunction with normal sunscreen.
“Sunscreen is extremely important; there definitely is protection, but [its] efficacy in melanoma and basal cell carcinoma is surprisingly and frustratingly incomplete,” said Fisher. “If you have someone who can tan very easily, it seems to be protective above and beyond the SPF factor.”“Sunscreen is extremely important; there definitely is protection, but [its] efficacy in melanoma and basal cell carcinoma is surprisingly and frustratingly incomplete,” said Fisher. “If you have someone who can tan very easily, it seems to be protective above and beyond the SPF factor.”
He added that for those who tan easily, it was not always clear whether wearing sunscreen all the time, but remaining as pale as possible, was more protective than allowing your skin to tan and relying on natural protection.He added that for those who tan easily, it was not always clear whether wearing sunscreen all the time, but remaining as pale as possible, was more protective than allowing your skin to tan and relying on natural protection.
“The dream strategy would be to combine both,” Fisher added.“The dream strategy would be to combine both,” Fisher added.
Melanoma is the least common but most serious form of skin cancer, and is responsible for about 2,000 deaths a year in the UK.Melanoma is the least common but most serious form of skin cancer, and is responsible for about 2,000 deaths a year in the UK.
David Adams, a geneticist at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute who has previously investigated the genetics of skin cancer, described the latest work as a significant advance. “If administered properly I imagine that the level of protection obtained by redheads would approximate the level of sun protection enjoyed by people with naturally tanned skin,” he said.David Adams, a geneticist at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute who has previously investigated the genetics of skin cancer, described the latest work as a significant advance. “If administered properly I imagine that the level of protection obtained by redheads would approximate the level of sun protection enjoyed by people with naturally tanned skin,” he said.
Wenyi Wei, an assistant professor at Harvard University and also a specialist in the genetics of skin cancer, said: “Increasing skin pigmentation as a natural barrier of UV exposure is a great idea.”Wenyi Wei, an assistant professor at Harvard University and also a specialist in the genetics of skin cancer, said: “Increasing skin pigmentation as a natural barrier of UV exposure is a great idea.”
However, he added that a potential downside of the new treatment is that the enzyme that it blocks (SIK), is itself a tumour suppressor, meaning the benefits of tanning would need to be carefully balanced with the risks of depleting this protective substance.However, he added that a potential downside of the new treatment is that the enzyme that it blocks (SIK), is itself a tumour suppressor, meaning the benefits of tanning would need to be carefully balanced with the risks of depleting this protective substance.
“I would suggest to use the SIK inhibitor only during high UV index seasons, not all year round,” he said.“I would suggest to use the SIK inhibitor only during high UV index seasons, not all year round,” he said.
The team are now looking for a commercial partner to carry out further testing in human trials. “It’s obviously critical that safety and toxicity studies need to be done,” said Fisher. “This is not a toy, it’s not a cosmetic.”The team are now looking for a commercial partner to carry out further testing in human trials. “It’s obviously critical that safety and toxicity studies need to be done,” said Fisher. “This is not a toy, it’s not a cosmetic.”
Skin cancerSkin cancer
SkincareSkincare
CancerCancer
Cancer researchCancer research
HealthHealth
Medical researchMedical research
newsnews
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content