This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/12/public-lands-bears-ears-national-monument-trump

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Trump urged to cut Bears Ears monument to 'smallest area' possible Trump urged to cut Bears Ears monument to 'smallest area' possible
(21 days later)
Interior secretary Ryan Zinke urges president to shrink 1.3m-acre national monument as administration continues push against federal public lands
Oliver Milman
Mon 12 Jun 2017 21.22 BST
Last modified on Fri 14 Jul 2017 18.00 BST
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
View more sharing options
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Close
Ryan Zinke, the US interior secretary, has recommended to Donald Trump that Bears Ears national monument in Utah be reduced in size to the “smallest area compatible” with its conservation.Ryan Zinke, the US interior secretary, has recommended to Donald Trump that Bears Ears national monument in Utah be reduced in size to the “smallest area compatible” with its conservation.
Zinke, who was tasked by Trump to review the 1.3m acre monument, said that there is “no doubt that it is drop-dead gorgeous country and that it merits some degree of protection” but that the scope of the designation was not appropriate.Zinke, who was tasked by Trump to review the 1.3m acre monument, said that there is “no doubt that it is drop-dead gorgeous country and that it merits some degree of protection” but that the scope of the designation was not appropriate.
The interior secretary said he had recommended to Trump that “the monument needs to be right-sized and that is absolutely critical that an appropriate part be co-managed by the tribal nations”.The interior secretary said he had recommended to Trump that “the monument needs to be right-sized and that is absolutely critical that an appropriate part be co-managed by the tribal nations”.
Zinke’s interim review of Bears Ears, which is named after a pair of mesas in south-eastern Utah surrounded by land considered of historical and cultural importance by local tribes, does not suggest a size the monument should be reduced to but notes that the area could be used for activities including mining, grazing, logging and hunting.Zinke’s interim review of Bears Ears, which is named after a pair of mesas in south-eastern Utah surrounded by land considered of historical and cultural importance by local tribes, does not suggest a size the monument should be reduced to but notes that the area could be used for activities including mining, grazing, logging and hunting.
The review calls for the boundary of the national monument to be modified to comply with the intent of the Antiquities Act, which mentions “the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the objects to be protected”.The review calls for the boundary of the national monument to be modified to comply with the intent of the Antiquities Act, which mentions “the smallest area compatible with proper care and management of the objects to be protected”.
Bears Ears was declared a national monument by Barack Obama in December, delighting several tribal leaders but provoking criticism from some businesses and Utah’s Republican delegation. Gary Herbert, the Utah governor, has said the designation “isn’t the democratic way; it’s certainly not the American way”.Bears Ears was declared a national monument by Barack Obama in December, delighting several tribal leaders but provoking criticism from some businesses and Utah’s Republican delegation. Gary Herbert, the Utah governor, has said the designation “isn’t the democratic way; it’s certainly not the American way”.
Under the national monument declaration, existing mining and grazing is allowed to continue, although new activity is curbed. Tribes are still able to conduct traditional gathering of herbs and plants.Under the national monument declaration, existing mining and grazing is allowed to continue, although new activity is curbed. Tribes are still able to conduct traditional gathering of herbs and plants.
Opponents of the decision said it was a federal “land grab” – even though the land was already federally managed – and argued it would stymie economic activity.Opponents of the decision said it was a federal “land grab” – even though the land was already federally managed – and argued it would stymie economic activity.
In April, Trump ordered the review of 27 national monuments declared since 1996, encompassing about 1bn acres, with Bears Ears among the most contentious.In April, Trump ordered the review of 27 national monuments declared since 1996, encompassing about 1bn acres, with Bears Ears among the most contentious.
“It’s gotten worse and worse and worse, and now we’re going to free it up,” Trump said at the time. “This should never have happened.”“It’s gotten worse and worse and worse, and now we’re going to free it up,” Trump said at the time. “This should never have happened.”
Environmentalists and the outdoor industry have attacked the review for potentially opening the way to rolling back protections for areas that attract visitors and preserve valued landscapes.Environmentalists and the outdoor industry have attacked the review for potentially opening the way to rolling back protections for areas that attract visitors and preserve valued landscapes.
“Zinke’s recommendation is a slap in the face to the tribes that sought protection for Bears Ears and any American who values our incredible public lands,” said Randi Spivak, public lands program director with the Center for Biological Diversity.“Zinke’s recommendation is a slap in the face to the tribes that sought protection for Bears Ears and any American who values our incredible public lands,” said Randi Spivak, public lands program director with the Center for Biological Diversity.
“Sadly, this is yet another corrupt process from the Trump administration that ignores public sentiment and rewards polluting industries that view our public lands as simply another source of profit.”“Sadly, this is yet another corrupt process from the Trump administration that ignores public sentiment and rewards polluting industries that view our public lands as simply another source of profit.”
Under the Antiquities Act, which was created in 1906, the US president has the unilateral power to declare tracts of land or ocean to be protected. No president has previously scaled back or scrapped a national monument, meaning that Trump is almost certain to face a legal challenge if he chooses to do so.Under the Antiquities Act, which was created in 1906, the US president has the unilateral power to declare tracts of land or ocean to be protected. No president has previously scaled back or scrapped a national monument, meaning that Trump is almost certain to face a legal challenge if he chooses to do so.
A public comment period for Bears Ears and the other national monuments will be open until July 10, to be followed by Zinke’s final recommendations to Trump.A public comment period for Bears Ears and the other national monuments will be open until July 10, to be followed by Zinke’s final recommendations to Trump.
Environment
This Land is Your Land
Donald Trump
news
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share via Email
Share on LinkedIn
Share on Pinterest
Share on Google+
Share on WhatsApp
Share on Messenger
Reuse this content