This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7507627.stm

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Warning over phone calls database Warning over phone calls database
(9 minutes later)
A central database holding details of everyone's phone calls and emails could be a "step too far for the British way of life", ministers have been warned.A central database holding details of everyone's phone calls and emails could be a "step too far for the British way of life", ministers have been warned.
Plans for such a database are rumoured to be in the Communications Data Bill.Plans for such a database are rumoured to be in the Communications Data Bill.
But Information Commissioner Richard Thomas said "lines must be drawn" to defend "fundamental liberties".But Information Commissioner Richard Thomas said "lines must be drawn" to defend "fundamental liberties".
He told the BBC he was not aware of such a database in any other democracy. He said there had also not been enough debate on the expanded DNA database.He told the BBC he was not aware of such a database in any other democracy. He said there had also not been enough debate on the expanded DNA database.
In his annual report, Mr Thomas addressed speculation about plans for a government-run database holding telephone and internet communications of the entire British population.In his annual report, Mr Thomas addressed speculation about plans for a government-run database holding telephone and internet communications of the entire British population.
'Full transparency''Full transparency'
He warned that while "targeted and duly authorised" interception of terrorist and other serious crime suspects' communications could be "invaluable" - there should be a full public debate on the justification for such a wide-ranging database.He warned that while "targeted and duly authorised" interception of terrorist and other serious crime suspects' communications could be "invaluable" - there should be a full public debate on the justification for such a wide-ranging database.
"Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?" he said in the report."Do we really want the police, security services and other organs of the state to have access to more and more aspects of our private lives?" he said in the report.
We do have to stand up and say these are our fundamental liberties and our freedoms and lines have to be drawn somewhere Richard ThomasInformation CommissionerWe do have to stand up and say these are our fundamental liberties and our freedoms and lines have to be drawn somewhere Richard ThomasInformation Commissioner
Later he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I'm not saying it's right or wrong but I think there should be absolute full transparency."Later he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I'm not saying it's right or wrong but I think there should be absolute full transparency."
He said it may make the work of the police simpler, but added: "We do have to stand up and say these are our fundamental liberties and our freedoms and lines have to be drawn somewhere, and there should be a full democratic debate about where exactly the lines should be drawn."He said it may make the work of the police simpler, but added: "We do have to stand up and say these are our fundamental liberties and our freedoms and lines have to be drawn somewhere, and there should be a full democratic debate about where exactly the lines should be drawn."
Speculation that the Home Office is considering collecting the information from phone companies and internet service providers has increased because the government has talked about "modifying procedures for acquiring communications data" in its proposed Communications Data Bill.Speculation that the Home Office is considering collecting the information from phone companies and internet service providers has increased because the government has talked about "modifying procedures for acquiring communications data" in its proposed Communications Data Bill.
Internet revolution
Currently police and intelligence agencies can ask telecommunication providers for information on phone calls made, texts sent and internet sites visited.
The provider can query the request, which might then go to the interception commissioner and another watchdog - but under the new proposals, that right would be removed.
Among those who have raised concerns is the Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker, who has said he anticipates the government will try to silence concerns by accusing critics of being "soft on terrorism".
He argues that while technology has moved on "apace", the protections for the individual have not.
The Home Office did not deny any plans for a database and said: "The changes to the way we communicate, due particularly to the internet revolution, will increasingly undermine our current capabilities to obtain communications data - essential for counter-terrorism and investigation of crime purpose - and use it to protect the public."The Home Office did not deny any plans for a database and said: "The changes to the way we communicate, due particularly to the internet revolution, will increasingly undermine our current capabilities to obtain communications data - essential for counter-terrorism and investigation of crime purpose - and use it to protect the public."
It added that as a result there could be "serious consequences" for police and intelligence gathering.It added that as a result there could be "serious consequences" for police and intelligence gathering.
"To ensure that the agencies can continue to use this valuable tool, the government is planning to bring forward the Communications Data Bill.""To ensure that the agencies can continue to use this valuable tool, the government is planning to bring forward the Communications Data Bill."