This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/world/middle_east/5346524.stm

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
US Iran report branded dishonest US Iran report branded dishonest
(about 1 hour later)
The UN nuclear watchdog has protested to the US government over a report on Iran's nuclear programme, calling it "erroneous" and "misleading".The UN nuclear watchdog has protested to the US government over a report on Iran's nuclear programme, calling it "erroneous" and "misleading".
In a leaked letter, the IAEA said a congressional report contained serious distortions of the agency's own findings on Iran's nuclear activity.In a leaked letter, the IAEA said a congressional report contained serious distortions of the agency's own findings on Iran's nuclear activity.
The IAEA also took "strong exception" to claims made over the removal of a senior safeguards inspector.The IAEA also took "strong exception" to claims made over the removal of a senior safeguards inspector.
The IAEA said the letter was sent to "set the record straight on the facts". There was no immediate comment from Washington over the letter.
"This is a matter of the integrity of the IAEA and its inspectors," spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said in a statement. But Rep Rush Holt, a Democratic member of the House intelligence committee, which released the report, said it had never been meant for release to the public.
"This report was not ready for prime time and it was not prepared in a way that we can rely on. It relied heavily on unclassified testimony," he told the BBC's PM programme.
'Deja vu''Deja vu'
The letter, signed by Vilmos Cserveny, a senior director at the International Atomic Energy Agency, was sent to the head of the House of Representatives' Select Committee on Intelligence, Peter Hoekstra. Signed by a senior director at the International Atomic Energy Agency, Vilmos Cserveny, the letter raises objections over the committee's report released on 23 August.
It says a report by the committee on 23 August was wrong to say that Iran had enriched uranium to weapons-grade level when the IAEA had only found small quantities of enrichment at far lower levels. It says the report was wrong to say that Iran had enriched uranium to weapons-grade level when the IAEA had only found small quantities of enrichment at far lower levels.
READ THE REPORT US report on Iran's nuclear programme [689KB] IAEA (UN) response to US report [227KB] Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader Download the reader hereREAD THE REPORT US report on Iran's nuclear programme [689KB] IAEA (UN) response to US report [227KB] Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader Download the reader here
The letter went on to say that it took "strong exception to the incorrect and misleading assertion" that the IAEA removed senior safeguards inspector Chris Charlier for "allegedly raising concerns about Iranian deception" over its programme. The letter took "strong exception to the incorrect and misleading assertion" that the IAEA removed senior safeguards inspector Chris Charlier for "allegedly raising concerns about Iranian deception" over its programme.
It went on to say the report contained an "outrageous and dishonest suggestion" that he was removed for not adhering to an alleged IAEA policy barring its "officials from telling the whole truth" about Iran. It said Mr Charlier had been removed at the request of Tehran, which has the right to make such an objection under agreed rules between the agency and all states.
Mr Charlier had been removed at Tehran's request, the letter said. He remains head of a section investigating Iran, the IAEA says.
There was no immediate response from Washington over the letter. The letter went on to brand "outrageous and dishonest" a suggestion in the report that he was removed for not adhering "to an unstated IAEA policy barring IAEA officials from telling the whole truth" about Iran.
The letter, sent to Peter Hoekstra, head of the House of Representatives' Select Committee on Intelligence, was aimed at setting "the record straight on the facts", the IAEA said.
"This is a matter of the integrity of the IAEA and its inspectors," spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said in a statement.
A Western diplomat called it "deja vu of the pre-Iraq war period".A Western diplomat called it "deja vu of the pre-Iraq war period".
The IAEA and the US clashed over intelligence that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction in the lead-up to the war in Iraq in March 2003.