This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-budget-military-analysis.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| In Trump Budget, More for Military, as His Supporters May Lose Out | |
| (about 11 hours later) | |
| To construct an “America First” budget, the initial trade-off for President Trump was fairly obvious: The military and veterans would get more of what they want or need, while diplomats and foreign countries would have to make do with less. | To construct an “America First” budget, the initial trade-off for President Trump was fairly obvious: The military and veterans would get more of what they want or need, while diplomats and foreign countries would have to make do with less. |
| But in his first spending blueprint since taking office, Mr. Trump also made choices demonstrating that parts of America will be more first than others — and some of the budget losers, it turns out, may be some of the very constituencies that have been most supportive of the new president during his improbable rise to power. | But in his first spending blueprint since taking office, Mr. Trump also made choices demonstrating that parts of America will be more first than others — and some of the budget losers, it turns out, may be some of the very constituencies that have been most supportive of the new president during his improbable rise to power. |
| While border guards will have more prisons to lock up unauthorized immigrants, rural communities will lose grants and loans to build water facilities and financing to keep their airports open. As charter schools are bolstered, after-school and summer programs will lose money. As law enforcement agents get more help to fight the opioid epidemic, lower-income Americans will have less access to home energy aid, job training programs and legal services. | While border guards will have more prisons to lock up unauthorized immigrants, rural communities will lose grants and loans to build water facilities and financing to keep their airports open. As charter schools are bolstered, after-school and summer programs will lose money. As law enforcement agents get more help to fight the opioid epidemic, lower-income Americans will have less access to home energy aid, job training programs and legal services. |
| The budget proposal that will be unveiled by Mr. Trump’s White House on Thursday represents the most dramatic shift in how national resources are divvied up of any presidential spending plan since Ronald Reagan. In his rhetoric both before the election and since his inauguration, Mr. Trump outlined a vision of a country getting back to basics, tapping into a visceral sense among many Americans that Washington has been too generous with taxpayer money spent wastefully both at home and abroad while doing nothing to alleviate what he called the “American carnage.” The budget is his first attempt to translate that into concrete reality. | The budget proposal that will be unveiled by Mr. Trump’s White House on Thursday represents the most dramatic shift in how national resources are divvied up of any presidential spending plan since Ronald Reagan. In his rhetoric both before the election and since his inauguration, Mr. Trump outlined a vision of a country getting back to basics, tapping into a visceral sense among many Americans that Washington has been too generous with taxpayer money spent wastefully both at home and abroad while doing nothing to alleviate what he called the “American carnage.” The budget is his first attempt to translate that into concrete reality. |
| Mr. Trump wants to slash deeply into domestic and international programs to pay for a large military buildup and protect Social Security and Medicare without increasing the deficit or raising major taxes. As a practical matter, the budget may stand little chance of passing intact. But as a political statement, it represents a new way of doing business. | Mr. Trump wants to slash deeply into domestic and international programs to pay for a large military buildup and protect Social Security and Medicare without increasing the deficit or raising major taxes. As a practical matter, the budget may stand little chance of passing intact. But as a political statement, it represents a new way of doing business. |
| “To keep Americans safe, we have made the tough choices that have been put off for too long,” Mr. Trump wrote in the introduction to the budget proposal. “But we have also made the necessary investments that are long overdue.” | “To keep Americans safe, we have made the tough choices that have been put off for too long,” Mr. Trump wrote in the introduction to the budget proposal. “But we have also made the necessary investments that are long overdue.” |
| Not surprisingly, Mr. Trump’s budget would sharply ratchet back American investment in the outside world. The United States would cut back financing for international peacekeeping missions, humanitarian assistance, cultural exchanges, refugee assistance and third world development. The United Nations, the World Bank and other institutions would no longer find themselves as flush with American dollars. | Not surprisingly, Mr. Trump’s budget would sharply ratchet back American investment in the outside world. The United States would cut back financing for international peacekeeping missions, humanitarian assistance, cultural exchanges, refugee assistance and third world development. The United Nations, the World Bank and other institutions would no longer find themselves as flush with American dollars. |
| What his budget proposal makes clear, however, is that such cuts, deep as they are, would not be enough by themselves to pay for his reinvestment in the armed forces, meaning that Mr. Trump had to turn to programs that might be defined by others as America-first in their orientation and goals. | What his budget proposal makes clear, however, is that such cuts, deep as they are, would not be enough by themselves to pay for his reinvestment in the armed forces, meaning that Mr. Trump had to turn to programs that might be defined by others as America-first in their orientation and goals. |
| The tough choices he promised would eliminate longstanding staples of American life. | The tough choices he promised would eliminate longstanding staples of American life. |
| Gone would be federal financing for public television, the arts and humanities. Federal support for long-distance Amtrak train service would be eliminated. Washington would get out of the business of helping clean up the Chesapeake Bay or the Great Lakes. | Gone would be federal financing for public television, the arts and humanities. Federal support for long-distance Amtrak train service would be eliminated. Washington would get out of the business of helping clean up the Chesapeake Bay or the Great Lakes. |
| While he may not care about East Coast elites upset about ending financing for the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, some of the agencies and programs that would be “zeroed out” are institutions in parts of the country that Mr. Trump won last November. | While he may not care about East Coast elites upset about ending financing for the National Endowment for the Arts and the National Endowment for the Humanities, some of the agencies and programs that would be “zeroed out” are institutions in parts of the country that Mr. Trump won last November. |
| Among the agencies to be cut off, for instance, would be the Appalachian Regional Commission, a federal-state agency founded in 1965 to promote economic development and infrastructure in some of the poorest parts of the United States. | Among the agencies to be cut off, for instance, would be the Appalachian Regional Commission, a federal-state agency founded in 1965 to promote economic development and infrastructure in some of the poorest parts of the United States. |
| Mr. Trump and his aides argue that many of these programs have long since passed their usefulness or would be better off run and paid for at the state or local level. While he talked about the ravaged inner cities in his Inaugural Address, Mr. Trump would eliminate $3 billion in funding for the Community Development Block Grant program that helps provide affordable housing. The president argued in his budget that “the program is not well targeted to the poorest populations and has not demonstrated results.” | Mr. Trump and his aides argue that many of these programs have long since passed their usefulness or would be better off run and paid for at the state or local level. While he talked about the ravaged inner cities in his Inaugural Address, Mr. Trump would eliminate $3 billion in funding for the Community Development Block Grant program that helps provide affordable housing. The president argued in his budget that “the program is not well targeted to the poorest populations and has not demonstrated results.” |
| Similarly, federal support for rural airports should go, he argued, because it was originally conceived of as a temporary program nearly 40 years ago to provide subsidized commercial air service to communities that otherwise would not have flights. | Similarly, federal support for rural airports should go, he argued, because it was originally conceived of as a temporary program nearly 40 years ago to provide subsidized commercial air service to communities that otherwise would not have flights. |
| With the cost per passenger so high, Mr. Trump’s budget argues that some of these communities are close enough to major airports that they do not need their own or that they “could be served by other existing modes of transportation.” | With the cost per passenger so high, Mr. Trump’s budget argues that some of these communities are close enough to major airports that they do not need their own or that they “could be served by other existing modes of transportation.” |
| The sharpest domestic cuts would scale back the Environmental Protection Agency, which Mr. Trump believes has hamstrung economic growth with excessive regulation. | The sharpest domestic cuts would scale back the Environmental Protection Agency, which Mr. Trump believes has hamstrung economic growth with excessive regulation. |
| Under his plan, funding would be eliminated for international climate change programs, climate change research and President Barack Obama’s plan to force power plants to limit their carbon emissions. | Under his plan, funding would be eliminated for international climate change programs, climate change research and President Barack Obama’s plan to force power plants to limit their carbon emissions. |
| More than 50 other E.P.A. programs would be eliminated, including those assisting Alaskan native villages and communities along the Mexican border. Funding for Superfund cleanups of hazardous waste sites would be reduced by about a third. | More than 50 other E.P.A. programs would be eliminated, including those assisting Alaskan native villages and communities along the Mexican border. Funding for Superfund cleanups of hazardous waste sites would be reduced by about a third. |
| “These cuts are sensible and rational,” Mr. Trump wrote in his budget message about his overall approach. “Every agency and department will be driven to achieve greater efficiency and to eliminate wasteful spending in carrying out their honorable service to the American people.” | “These cuts are sensible and rational,” Mr. Trump wrote in his budget message about his overall approach. “Every agency and department will be driven to achieve greater efficiency and to eliminate wasteful spending in carrying out their honorable service to the American people.” |
| Even with that, Mr. Trump would make no progress toward his campaign promise to reduce not only the annual budget deficit but the accumulated national debt. During the election, he said he could eliminate in just eight years the entire $20 trillion in debt that the nation has built up over generations. | Even with that, Mr. Trump would make no progress toward his campaign promise to reduce not only the annual budget deficit but the accumulated national debt. During the election, he said he could eliminate in just eight years the entire $20 trillion in debt that the nation has built up over generations. |
| But he offered no plans to reduce the deficit in this proposal, simply offsetting $54 billion in increased military spending with $54 billion in domestic and international cuts. | But he offered no plans to reduce the deficit in this proposal, simply offsetting $54 billion in increased military spending with $54 billion in domestic and international cuts. |
| As a result, the nation next year will continue to spend more than it takes in through taxes and therefore will still add hundreds of billions of dollars to the national debt. | As a result, the nation next year will continue to spend more than it takes in through taxes and therefore will still add hundreds of billions of dollars to the national debt. |
| Mr. Trump made no mention of that in his budget message, but his budget director, Mick Mulvaney, a longtime deficit hawk, did, foreshadowing the tension that will eventually challenge this president as his term progresses. “Our $20 trillion national debt is a crisis, not just for the nation, but for every citizen,” Mr. Mulvaney wrote. | Mr. Trump made no mention of that in his budget message, but his budget director, Mick Mulvaney, a longtime deficit hawk, did, foreshadowing the tension that will eventually challenge this president as his term progresses. “Our $20 trillion national debt is a crisis, not just for the nation, but for every citizen,” Mr. Mulvaney wrote. |
| But that will be a crisis for another day. | But that will be a crisis for another day. |