Ministers can no longer ignore protests over the school funding crisis

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/mar/14/schools-funding-philip-hammond-budget

Version 0 of 1.

Schools are where society invests in its future. They are where our collective knowledge, skills, culture and values are reinforced, realigned and passed on to the next generation. The hallmark of a civilised society – one that believes that the key to its success lies in the optimism and ideals of its young people – is surely in its commitment to schools and colleges.

And last week in his spring budget the chancellor had the chance to demonstrate the government believes this, too. Instead, Philip Hammond chose to ignore the evidence of a looming funding crisis in schools.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies warns that by 2020 funding per pupil will have been cut in real terms by 6.5% for schools, and 16-18 education will be at a similar level in real terms to that 30 years ago.

Meanwhile, the costs of employing staff – usually something like 80% of the outgoings of a school or college – are growing because of increases in employer contributions to national insurance and pensions, plus pay increases for which there has been no additional funding from government.

The government is going to find that ignoring this issue is not going to make it go away as voices of protest become louder. Suddenly places that rarely made the headlines – east Cheshire, West Sussex – are in the news, with headteachers, governors and, increasingly, parents are all warning children’s education will be damaged unless funding is found.

The budget could have addressed the educational needs of the many over the few. Instead, what we got was an announcement about building new free schools at a time when schools are having to make £3bn of savings.

There is already a need for some 284,000 new secondary places by 2020. It is therefore essential that any new schools are built in areas where places are needed, rather than creating deliberate surpluses, as has often been the case with free schools. Unless new schools directly help communities that lack school places, then parents and other taxpayers are going to see this as a shocking waste of public money.

When I stood for election as general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, I said that any government plans should meet three criteria. They should be rooted in evidence, they should arise from genuine consultation and they should be built on principles of social justice.

The government has announced it intends to publish a white paper in the next few weeks on its plans to increase the number of selective schools in England. This pre-empts any news of the results of its consultation on the subject, and ministers have provided no new evidence for how more selection will improve the life chances of our most disadvantaged young people. This feels like policy rooted in ideology.

As I know from my 15 years as a headteacher, always working with specialist business managers, saving, say, £150,000 in your budget in a year, cannot be achieved by deferring new textbooks or leaving the maths block unpainted.

Instead schools will have to increase class sizes in order to maximise the number of students being taught by the minimum number of teachers. They will limit courses at GCSE and sixth-form level to reduce the number of teachers needed. They will even have to contemplate cutting staff time for preparation, marking and planning.

This growing crisis comes on the watch of a prime minister and secretary of state for education who talk a lot about social mobility and have identified education as the engine room of national progress. Yet it is disadvantaged students and schools in fragile communities that are likely to be hardest hit by funding reductions that this budget has not addressed.

These are the schools where parent teacher associations are least likely to be able to contribute to funds, where budgets are already being disproportionately used to bring in expensive supply staff from agencies, where decisions not to upgrade facilities simply intensify the social gap between the haves and have-nots.

Many school leaders already serve as the social glue that helps hold together such communities. Now those leaders are saying that on behalf of the children, parents and governors more funding must be found – for all our schools, not just for pet projects.

This is a government that speaks loftily of social justice. In the budget it had one parliament-defining opportunity to put its money where its mouth is. Instead we witnessed the triumph of dogma over evidence.

Geoff Barton is headteacher of King Edward VI school, Bury St Edmunds. He was elected general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders in February 2017