'Coalition report recommends ban on foreign donations to environment activists' diff viewer (0/1)

This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on March 10, 2017 04:54 (UTC). It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/mar/10/coalition-report-recommends-ban-on-foreign-donations-to-environment-activists

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Previous version 1 Next version

Previous version 1 Next version

Version 0	Version 1
Coalition report recommends ban on foreign donations to environment activists	Coalition report recommends ban on foreign donations to environment activists
2017-03-10 04:55:16 UTC	2017-03-10 08:55:08 UTC (about 4 hours later)
The Coalition has singled out environment groups for special attention in a new parliamentary report that recommends banning foreign donations. The report draws on testimony from the mining industry to argue some some activist groups “appear to be circumventing the system”.	The Coalition has singled out environment groups for special attention in a new parliamentary report that recommends banning foreign donations. The report draws on testimony from the mining industry to argue some some activist groups “appear to be circumventing the system”.
The joint parliamentary committee on electoral matters, released the report on Friday recommending banning foreign political donations, but as Guardian Australia revealed on Thursday, the major parties have split over the treatment of activist groups.	The joint parliamentary committee on electoral matters, released the report on Friday recommending banning foreign political donations, but as Guardian Australia revealed on Thursday, the major parties have split over the treatment of activist groups.
Coalition members of the committee recommended a prohibition on donations from foreign citizens and foreign entities to Australian registered political parties, associated entities and “third parties”, such as activist groups.	Coalition members of the committee recommended a prohibition on donations from foreign citizens and foreign entities to Australian registered political parties, associated entities and “third parties”, such as activist groups.
The proposed ban would not apply to dual Australian citizens either in Australia or overseas, or to non-Australian permanent residents in Australia.	The proposed ban would not apply to dual Australian citizens either in Australia or overseas, or to non-Australian permanent residents in Australia.
Labor members agreed that foreign citizens and foreign entities should be banned from making donations to Australian registered political parties, and the ban should be extended to the associated entities of registered political parties, which would include some, but not all, trade unions.	Labor members agreed that foreign citizens and foreign entities should be banned from making donations to Australian registered political parties, and the ban should be extended to the associated entities of registered political parties, which would include some, but not all, trade unions.
But Labor members of the committee issued a dissenting report saying they could not support the Coalition proposal to extend the fundraising and financial disclosure obligations imposed by the Electoral Act “to capture all third parties that are in any way involved in public campaigning”.	But Labor members of the committee issued a dissenting report saying they could not support the Coalition proposal to extend the fundraising and financial disclosure obligations imposed by the Electoral Act “to capture all third parties that are in any way involved in public campaigning”.
Labor members said extending the ban to third-party activist groups “would represent a dramatic extension of scope of the current regulatory scheme under the act”.	Labor members said extending the ban to third-party activist groups “would represent a dramatic extension of scope of the current regulatory scheme under the act”.
“We acknowledge that concerns have been raised in this regard but there is scant evidence before the committee to support any such proposal,” the dissenting report says. “Indeed, the rationale for it is unclear.”	“We acknowledge that concerns have been raised in this regard but there is scant evidence before the committee to support any such proposal,” the dissenting report says. “Indeed, the rationale for it is unclear.”
Coalition members of the committee made the case that if the ban didn’t apply to all actors in the political system – political parties, associated entities, and third party activist groups – then a significant loophole would be created.	Coalition members of the committee made the case that if the ban didn’t apply to all actors in the political system – political parties, associated entities, and third party activist groups – then a significant loophole would be created.
The report authored by government MPs says third parties are not subject to the electoral disclosure regime due to their deductible gift recipient (DGR) status.	The report authored by government MPs says third parties are not subject to the electoral disclosure regime due to their deductible gift recipient (DGR) status.
“They do not self-identify their activities as political campaigning and thus operate outside the current disclosure regime,” the report says. “This allows both foreign and domestic donors to contribute funds in support of domestic campaigns with little or no transparency.”	“They do not self-identify their activities as political campaigning and thus operate outside the current disclosure regime,” the report says. “This allows both foreign and domestic donors to contribute funds in support of domestic campaigns with little or no transparency.”
The JSCEM chair, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, said third party actors were proliferating in the Australian political scene, incurring increasing amounts of unregulated expenditure.	The JSCEM chair, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, said third party actors were proliferating in the Australian political scene, incurring increasing amounts of unregulated expenditure.
Reynolds warned: “If this loophole is not addressed in legislation, the likely consequence of a ban on foreign donations to organisations regulated by the AEC, is that funds will be channelled through organisations that are not.”	Reynolds warned: “If this loophole is not addressed in legislation, the likely consequence of a ban on foreign donations to organisations regulated by the AEC, is that funds will be channelled through organisations that are not.”
The report authored by Coalition MPs points to testimony given to the inquiry by the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) “that a number of environmental groups were actively participating in political campaigning but were still registered as charitable organisations, thus allowing them to avoid declaring the source of their foreign and domestic funding”.	The report authored by Coalition MPs points to testimony given to the inquiry by the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) “that a number of environmental groups were actively participating in political campaigning but were still registered as charitable organisations, thus allowing them to avoid declaring the source of their foreign and domestic funding”.
The report quotes the MCA saying “these groups should not be exempt from reasonable disclosure obligations that help maintain public confidence in Australia’s political system.”	The report quotes the MCA saying “these groups should not be exempt from reasonable disclosure obligations that help maintain public confidence in Australia’s political system.”
The MCA told JSCEM there was “evidence that a number of organisations that received tax concessions are engaging in activities in defiance of clear regulatory restrictions”.	The MCA told JSCEM there was “evidence that a number of organisations that received tax concessions are engaging in activities in defiance of clear regulatory restrictions”.
Specific examples given included:	Specific examples given included:
Greenpeace Australia Pacific, 350.org Australia and the Wilderness Society (Australia) participating in a pre-election rally against prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in June 2016, along with the Australian Labor party, the NSW Greens and GetUp	Greenpeace Australia Pacific, 350.org Australia and the Wilderness Society (Australia) participating in a pre-election rally against prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in June 2016, along with the Australian Labor party, the NSW Greens and GetUp
The Australian Conservation Foundation hired a truck to drive through the environment minister Josh Frydenberg’s electorate during the 2016 election campaign, which displayed a banner criticising the minister for refusing to sign the foundation’s environment pledge.	The Australian Conservation Foundation hired a truck to drive through the environment minister Josh Frydenberg’s electorate during the 2016 election campaign, which displayed a banner criticising the minister for refusing to sign the foundation’s environment pledge.
In October 2016, the Australian Marine Conservation Society attacked the Queensland Labor government’s dealings with Adani by staging protests at Labor’s state conference.	In October 2016, the Australian Marine Conservation Society attacked the Queensland Labor government’s dealings with Adani by staging protests at Labor’s state conference.
The Wilderness Society (Queensland) authorised campaign material during the 2015 Queensland state election urging voters to “Put the LNP last.”	The Wilderness Society (Queensland) authorised campaign material during the 2015 Queensland state election urging voters to “Put the LNP last.”
On 14 August 2015, the Australian Conservation Foundation authorised a one-page advertisement against the then environment minister, Greg Hunt. The advertisement included the logos of five other entities that are both registered environmental organisations and registered charities.	On 14 August 2015, the Australian Conservation Foundation authorised a one-page advertisement against the then environment minister, Greg Hunt. The advertisement included the logos of five other entities that are both registered environmental organisations and registered charities.
~~Friends of the Earth Australia passed on a donation of $262,000 from businessman and philanthropist Graeme Wood to the activist group GetUp~~	A further claim made in the report was that Friends of the Earth Australia passed on a donation of $262,000 from businessman and philanthropist Graeme Wood to the activist group GetUp. However, a spokesperson for GetUp said that claim had been investigated and found to be without basis.
	GetUp said government MPs had based their report on “copying and pasting the submission from the Minerals Council using misleading information.”
	“This is disgraceful,” said Paul Oosting, national director of GetUp.
	“Now the Turnbull government is seeking to stop environmental groups standing up for the environment, reducing the ability of people to engage in our political system, in the interests of big businesses,” Oosting said.
	“Is this how they are going to justify giving a billion dollars of taxpayer money to Adani to build a coal mine that most Australians oppose.”
The Liberal MPs’ report notes registered environmental organisations are endorsed by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) to receive tax-deductible gifts and contributions, “but only for the principal purpose of protecting the natural environment, or undertaking related education or research.”	The Liberal MPs’ report notes registered environmental organisations are endorsed by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) to receive tax-deductible gifts and contributions, “but only for the principal purpose of protecting the natural environment, or undertaking related education or research.”
“Moreover, registered environmental organisations must not act as a conduit for the donation of money or property to other entities, although they may pay other bodies to undertake natural conservation work.”	“Moreover, registered environmental organisations must not act as a conduit for the donation of money or property to other entities, although they may pay other bodies to undertake natural conservation work.”
Concern is raised in the report that the groups are involved in political campaigning whilst in receipt of DGR status, without being subjected to the same donations and disclosure regime as other players in the political system.	Concern is raised in the report that the groups are involved in political campaigning whilst in receipt of DGR status, without being subjected to the same donations and disclosure regime as other players in the political system.
The Labor members suggest the regulation of third parties should be examined by another parliamentary inquiry.	The Labor members suggest the regulation of third parties should be examined by another parliamentary inquiry.
“The Coalition proposal has a very wide ambit and Labor members of the committee are concerned that it may lead to unfortunate, presumably unintended, consequences in terms of imposing wide-ranging restrictions on the capacity of not-for-profit organisations to draw attention to their causes,” the Labor MPs say.	“The Coalition proposal has a very wide ambit and Labor members of the committee are concerned that it may lead to unfortunate, presumably unintended, consequences in terms of imposing wide-ranging restrictions on the capacity of not-for-profit organisations to draw attention to their causes,” the Labor MPs say.
“These causes could very well cover the field of Australian public discourse – from overseas aid, to Indigenous advancement.”	“These causes could very well cover the field of Australian public discourse – from overseas aid, to Indigenous advancement.”
“What sort of government would seek to shut down, or monopolise, these conversations?”	“What sort of government would seek to shut down, or monopolise, these conversations?”
The Greens make a similar argument in their dissenting report.	The Greens make a similar argument in their dissenting report.
“If such a law was enacted it would drastically curtail the role of civil society in Australia,” says Green senator and democracy spokeswoman Lee Rhiannon.	“If such a law was enacted it would drastically curtail the role of civil society in Australia,” says Green senator and democracy spokeswoman Lee Rhiannon.
“This is a highly partisan approach by the Liberal-National parties that would disadvantage some community groups working for the social good while not capturing groups such as the Minerals Council of Australia which is funded by large membership fees – which are not technically donations – from companies that are completely or largely foreign owned.”	“This is a highly partisan approach by the Liberal-National parties that would disadvantage some community groups working for the social good while not capturing groups such as the Minerals Council of Australia which is funded by large membership fees – which are not technically donations – from companies that are completely or largely foreign owned.”
The Liberal democratic party senator David Leyonhjelm issued another dissenting report declaring foreign donations shouldn’t be banned.	The Liberal democratic party senator David Leyonhjelm issued another dissenting report declaring foreign donations shouldn’t be banned.
“Prohibition of foreign donations is a solution in search of a problem,” Leyonhjelm says.	“Prohibition of foreign donations is a solution in search of a problem,” Leyonhjelm says.
“There is no reason to believe regulation will achieve anything of benefit to Australian democracy, while there are grounds to believe it will have unintended consequences and harm democracy.”	“There is no reason to believe regulation will achieve anything of benefit to Australian democracy, while there are grounds to believe it will have unintended consequences and harm democracy.”