This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/business/dealbook/snap-ipo-snapchat.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Snap Prices I.P.O. at $17 a Share, Valuing Company at $24 Billion Snap Prices I.P.O. at $17 a Share, Valuing Company at $24 Billion
(about 4 hours later)
A loss of more than $500 million last year. A company whose co-founders can, in effect, keep control for years after leaving. And once-explosive user growth that appears to have hit a speed bump. Millennials, those 14 to 35 years old, may be as exuberantly hyped a demographic as any in recent memory.
For many investors in Snapchat’s parent company, none of this will matter much, at least at first. That generation has now helped power one of the biggest and most eagerly awaited stock market debuts in recent memory, making billionaires of the founders of the disappearing-message service Snapchat.
On Wednesday, shares of Snap Inc. were priced at $17 — higher than the expected price range of $14 to $16 — indicating strong demand among investors. The price values the California company at $24 billion. Snap’s shares are set to trade on the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday. Investors, attracted by Snapchat’s hold on its millennial users — who check the app on average more than 18 times a day — flocked to the initial public offering, pushing the parent company, Snap Inc., to a valuation of nearly $24 billion.
The question beyond this week is whether the disappearing-messages company will prove to be like Facebook — or embattled Twitter. The stock sale sets Snap up as the most valuable American technology company to go public since Facebook nearly five years ago. And it may herald a coming wave of unicorns — technology start-ups valued at more than $1 billion by private investors — that are expected to hit the public markets in the next few years.
Snap’s offering will be one of the biggest and highest-profile market debuts of recent years, raising billions of dollars, giving lift to a moribund market in new stocks and minting paper wealth for its top investors. Snap’s offering was priced on Wednesday at $17 a share — a dollar more than the previously expected pricing range. The pricing came on a day when the stock market surged to another high, fed by raised expectations of tax cuts, looser regulations and higher interest rates under the Trump administration. Shares of the social media companies Facebook and Twitter also rose.
Perhaps more important, it will cement Snap’s status as one of the newest members of a rarefied club of late: those unicorns, or start-ups valued at more than $1 billion by private investors, that have successfully jumped to the public markets. Those buying into Snap’s offering did so even as warning signs have flashed over the company, based in California. It lost more than $500 million last year, and its explosive user growth appears to have hit a speed bump. And in a decision that has angered some large investors, the shares will have no voting rights, leaving control in the hands of the company’s founders, who can retain that power for years even after leaving Snap.
In going public, Snap has leapt ahead of other technology darlings like Uber, Airbnb and the data-analysis provider Palantir. Yet when Snap begins trading on the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday, under the ticker “SNAP,” it will command a lofty valuation multiple even richer than that of Facebook, which earned $10 billion last year.
Demand among investors for shares in Snap, coming after a nearly two-week road show that spanned the country and stretched to London, proved robust. The question beyond this week is whether Snap will prove to be like mighty Facebook or embattled Twitter.
But with an expected market value of well past $20 billion, the company is now setting itself up with little room for error. Its valuation is far richer than that of Facebook, which earned $10 billion last year. By comparison, Snap lost $514 million during that same time, an amount that swelled from 2015. Much has been riding on Snap’s offering, including expectations that it will lift a moribund market in new stocks. In going public, Snap has leapt ahead of other technology darlings like Uber, Airbnb and the data-analysis provider Palantir.
Yet throughout presentations to investors, Snap executives and their advisers kept the emphasis squarely on the promise of what first seemed like a technological lark. Instead of focusing on the core product of disappearing messages, Snapchat instead represents a new way of consuming content, largely produced by its users — laid alongside a fast-growing advertising business. After a nearly two-week road show for investors that spanned the country and stretched to London, demand for Snap shares proved robust. Bankers for the company received orders totaling more than 10 times the number of shares up for sale.
As of the end of the year, Snap reported an average of 158 million active daily users. Revenue totaled about $404 million in 2016, up from zero in sales three years ago, and the company said it believed it could reach $1 billion this year. With a market value of almost $24 billion, including unvested stock options and grants, the company is now setting itself up with little room for error.
The company has come a long way from its beginnings in a Stanford dorm room as a service used largely by millennials enamored with sending their friends pictures and video that self-destructed after seconds. Throughout the presentations to investors, Snap executives and their advisers kept the emphasis squarely on the promise of what first seemed like a technological lark. Instead of focusing on the core product of disappearing messages, Snapchat instead represents a new way of consuming content, largely produced by its users — laid alongside a fast-growing advertising business.
Based in the fashionable Los Angeles neighborhood of Venice, the company has since introduced ways for users to broadcast “stories” about their days to wider audiences, and pioneered the use of computer-generated lenses that transform those users into dogs or tacos. At the end of 2016, Snap reported an average of 158 million active daily users. Revenue totaled about $404 million for the year, up from zero in sales three years ago. The company believes sales could reach $1 billion this year.
Those sales have come primarily from advertisers who covet both millennial users and a service that has figured out creative ways to reach them. Big-name brands from Gatorade to Tiffany have run campaigns on the social network, and the advertising titan WPP said at an industry conference on Wednesday that it spent $90 million on Snapchat ads last year.
Snap has come a long way from its beginnings in a Stanford dorm room as a service used largely by young people enamored with sending their friends pictures and video that self-destructed after seconds.
Based in the fashionable Los Angeles neighborhood of Venice, the company has since introduced ways for users to broadcast “stories” about their days to wider audiences and pioneered the use of computer-generated lenses that transform those users into dogs or Taco Bell tacos.
Now, Snap is trying to convey even greater ambitions.Now, Snap is trying to convey even greater ambitions.
In the prospectus for its stock sale, the service declared itself a “camera company.” So far that has included selling Spectacles, camera-equipped sunglasses that let users upload 10-second videos directly to Snapchat that briefly captured the fancy of the tech cognoscenti. And still more products could be at work within the often-secretive confines of the company’s offices. In the prospectus for its stock sale, the service declared itself a “camera company.” So far that has included selling Spectacles, camera-equipped sunglasses that let users upload 10-second videos directly to Snapchat, which briefly captured the fancy of the tech cognoscenti. And Snap has worked on prototypes for products like drone-mounted cameras.
Snap’s co-founder and chief executive, Evan Spiegel, has played down comparisons to Mark Zuckerberg, and the 26-year-old has assiduously painted an image of himself — a fashion aficionado with a supermodel fiancée — that is different from the Facebook billionaire. Evan Spiegel, 26, a Snap founder and its chief executive, has played down comparisons to the Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg and has assiduously painted an image of himself — a fashion aficionado with a supermodel fiancée — that is different from Mr. Zuckerberg.
But Mr. Spiegel and his fellow shareholders are still hoping that investors will buoy their company to Facebook-type heights. Since Mr. Zuckerberg took his business public just under five years ago, Facebook’s shares have climbed over 254 percent. But Mr. Spiegel and his fellow shareholders are still hoping that investors will help lift their company to Facebook-type heights. Since Mr. Zuckerberg took his business public just under five years ago, Facebook’s shares have climbed more than 254 percent.
The cautionary tale is that of Twitter, which celebrated a lofty stock market debut in 2013, only to see its share price tumble amid questions about its ability to grow. Twitter’s stock is down roughly 62 percent from its I.P.O., and the company has had to fend off questions about whether it could remain an independent and publicly traded business. The cautionary tale is that of Twitter, which celebrated a lofty stock market debut in 2013, only to have its share price tumble amid questions about its ability to grow. Twitter’s stock is down about 62 percent from its initial public offering, and the company has had to fend off questions about whether it can remain an independent and publicly traded business.
Analysts also raised the specter of lower growth with Snap as well, given that the company’s user growth slowed last year. Analysts also raised the specter of lower growth with Snap, given that the company’s user growth slowed last year.
Executives contended during the investor presentations that the slowdown arose largely because of technical issues with its Android app. And they argued that the bigger issue to look at was engagement. Or, put another way, how much its audience loves the app: Daily active users opened Snapchat on average more than 18 times each day. Then there is the copycatting of Snapchat’s most recognizable features, from its Stories to its animated lenses and filters. Chief among the imitators is Facebook, whose Instagram service has forthrightly adopted those elements. Even smaller social networks like Medium, a blog-posting service, have rolled out similar offerings.
Whether Snap floats or sinks, its offering will have already significantly enriched its earliest investors, notably co-founders Mr. Spiegel and Robert Murphy. With 227 million shares each, the two men are worth more than $3 billion each on paper, well ahead of their 30th birthdays. Executives contended during the investor presentations that Snapchat’s slowdown was largely due to technical issues with its Android app. And they argued that the bigger issue to look at was engagement, or, put another way, how much its audience loves the app.
And Snap, under Mr. Spiegel, has argued that it will continue to roll out new innovations.
Regardless of whether Snap soars or sinks, its offering will significantly enrich its earliest investors, notably Mr. Spiegel and the company’s other founder, Robert Murphy.
With 227 million shares each, the two men are each worth more than $3 billion on paper, well ahead of their 30th birthdays.