This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/28/world/middleeast/united-nations-security-council-syria-sanctions-russia-trump.html

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Security Council Vote on Syrian Chemical Arms Sets Up U.S.-Russia Clash At U.N., Russia Vetoes Penalties on Syria Over Use of Chemical Arms
(35 minutes later)
A public clash over the Syria conflict between the Trump administration and Russia was unfolding on Tuesday at the United Nations Security Council, where the United States delegation joined its European allies in seeking to punish the Syrian government for using chemical weapons. Russia and China blocked a United Nations Security Council resolution on Tuesday backed by the Trump administration that would have punished the Syrian government for using chemical weapons.
Russia signaled that it would veto a draft resolution imposing penalties on the government of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, in a vote set for later in the day. It would be the Kremlin’s seventh Security Council veto in defense of Mr. Assad in the Syria war, now nearly six years old. The Russian veto of the measure in a vote of the 15-member panel was the first public clash at the Security Council between the Kremlin and the Trump administration, which joined its European allies in supporting the resolution. The vote illustrated the divides that remain between Washington and Moscow despite Mr. Trump’s vow to improve relations.
The draft resolution, proposed by Britain and France months ago and endorsed by the United States last week, would impose sanctions on a handful of Syrian military officials and entities for having dropped chlorine-filled barrel bombs on opposition-held areas on at least three occasions in 2014 and 2015, according to a United Nations panel. The vote was nine in favor and three against, including Russia and China, another of the five veto-wielding permanent members of the Council. Three members abstained.
Russia had signaled that it would veto the resolution imposing penalties on the government of President Bashar al-Assad of Syria. It was the Kremlin’s seventh Security Council veto in defense of Mr. Assad in the Syria war, now nearly six years old.
The resolution, proposed by Britain and France months ago and endorsed by the United States last week, would have imposed sanctions on a handful of Syrian military officials and entities for having dropped chlorine-filled barrel bombs on opposition-held areas on at least three occasions in 2014 and 2015, according to a United Nations panel.
On Friday, Nikki R. Haley, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, said after a Security Council meeting on Syria that such attacks were “barbaric.” Chlorine is banned as a weapon under an international treaty that Mr. Assad’s government signed in 2013.On Friday, Nikki R. Haley, the United States ambassador to the United Nations, said after a Security Council meeting on Syria that such attacks were “barbaric.” Chlorine is banned as a weapon under an international treaty that Mr. Assad’s government signed in 2013.
“How much longer is Russia going to continue to babysit and make excuses for the Syrian regime?” Ms. Haley told reporters.“How much longer is Russia going to continue to babysit and make excuses for the Syrian regime?” Ms. Haley told reporters.
The arguments and vote over the resolution were important because they provided new insight into how President Trump, who has made clear his intent to improve ties with Russia, would deal with the Kremlin over the Syria war. Russia is Mr. Assad’s most important foreign ally.The arguments and vote over the resolution were important because they provided new insight into how President Trump, who has made clear his intent to improve ties with Russia, would deal with the Kremlin over the Syria war. Russia is Mr. Assad’s most important foreign ally.
The conflict over the resolution was in sharp contrast to a Russian-American consensus on the need to contain Syria’s use of chemical weapons. After a sarin gas attack on a suburb of Damascus in August 2013, Moscow and Washington struck a deal to force Mr. Assad to sign the chemical weapons treaty and dismantle his stockpile of the poisonous munitions under international supervision.The conflict over the resolution was in sharp contrast to a Russian-American consensus on the need to contain Syria’s use of chemical weapons. After a sarin gas attack on a suburb of Damascus in August 2013, Moscow and Washington struck a deal to force Mr. Assad to sign the chemical weapons treaty and dismantle his stockpile of the poisonous munitions under international supervision.
The Syrian government, though, violated the deal, according to a United Nations panel set up by the Security Council, known as the Joint Investigative Mechanism. It found that the government had used chemical weapons at least three times.The Syrian government, though, violated the deal, according to a United Nations panel set up by the Security Council, known as the Joint Investigative Mechanism. It found that the government had used chemical weapons at least three times.
Russia helped to create the panel but questioned its findings when it implicated the Syrian government. The panel also found that Islamic State militants in Syria used mustard gas in August 2015.Russia helped to create the panel but questioned its findings when it implicated the Syrian government. The panel also found that Islamic State militants in Syria used mustard gas in August 2015.
Moscow made clear last week that it would defeat the draft measure to impose sanctions on the Syrian government, calling it unbalanced. The Russian veto threat served to signal how far Russia was willing to go to shield its ally in Damascus. Moscow made clear last week that it would defeat the draft measure to impose sanctions on the Syrian government, calling it unbalanced. The Russian veto signaled how far Russia was willing to go to shield its ally in Damascus.
President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia reinforced his opposition on Tuesday, adding that Security Council penalties on the Syrian government would complicate diplomatic efforts underway in Geneva aimed at halting the war. President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia reinforced his opposition on Tuesday, adding that any Security Council penalties on the Syrian government would complicate diplomatic efforts underway in Geneva aimed at halting the war.
“As for sanctions against the Syrian leadership, I think the move is totally inappropriate now,” he told a news conference while visiting Kyrgyzstan. “It does not help, would not help the negotiation process. It would only hurt or undermine confidence during the process.”“As for sanctions against the Syrian leadership, I think the move is totally inappropriate now,” he told a news conference while visiting Kyrgyzstan. “It does not help, would not help the negotiation process. It would only hurt or undermine confidence during the process.”
Human Rights Watch concluded in a recent report that the Syrian military had not only violated its promises not to use chemical weapons but had systematically dropped chlorine bombs in the final weeks of the battle to take the northern city of Aleppo last fall.Human Rights Watch concluded in a recent report that the Syrian military had not only violated its promises not to use chemical weapons but had systematically dropped chlorine bombs in the final weeks of the battle to take the northern city of Aleppo last fall.
Mr. Trump repeatedly has expressed admiration for Mr. Putin of Russia and said he wanted to strike a deal with him to stop the war in Syria and focus on fighting terrorism. But disagreements within Mr. Trump’s administration appear to have complicated that goal.Mr. Trump repeatedly has expressed admiration for Mr. Putin of Russia and said he wanted to strike a deal with him to stop the war in Syria and focus on fighting terrorism. But disagreements within Mr. Trump’s administration appear to have complicated that goal.
Ms. Haley has taken a hard line against Russia. She condemned what she called Russia’s “aggressive actions” in eastern Ukraine, vowed to maintain sanctions related to the Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and in her Senate confirmation hearing, went as far as saying that Russia was guilty of war crimes in Syria.Ms. Haley has taken a hard line against Russia. She condemned what she called Russia’s “aggressive actions” in eastern Ukraine, vowed to maintain sanctions related to the Russia’s annexation of Crimea, and in her Senate confirmation hearing, went as far as saying that Russia was guilty of war crimes in Syria.
Her comments on Russia, often directly contradicting her boss, echo the talking points of the previous administration of Barack Obama, but they also reflect the concerns of Republicans in Congress, who distrust the Kremlin.Her comments on Russia, often directly contradicting her boss, echo the talking points of the previous administration of Barack Obama, but they also reflect the concerns of Republicans in Congress, who distrust the Kremlin.
Ms. Haley was in Washington on Monday for meetings at the White House. A former governor of South Carolina, she has by her own admission limited foreign policy experience.Ms. Haley was in Washington on Monday for meetings at the White House. A former governor of South Carolina, she has by her own admission limited foreign policy experience.
She has so far kept her comments limited to a handful of foreign policy issues that plainly deliver political dividends at home. She has maintained a tough line on Russia and Iran, pledged to defend Israel, and promised more oversight into how American funding for the United Nations is spent.She has so far kept her comments limited to a handful of foreign policy issues that plainly deliver political dividends at home. She has maintained a tough line on Russia and Iran, pledged to defend Israel, and promised more oversight into how American funding for the United Nations is spent.
She has said nothing about the Trump administration’s travel ban on refugees and visa applicants from seven predominantly Muslim countries, which the United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, has criticized.She has said nothing about the Trump administration’s travel ban on refugees and visa applicants from seven predominantly Muslim countries, which the United Nations secretary general, António Guterres, has criticized.
Ms. Haley, an American of Indian descent who grew up in a small South Carolina town, also has been silent on the attack on two Indian engineers in Kansas last week, which was suspected to be a hate crime and which threatens to cloud Indian-American relations.Ms. Haley, an American of Indian descent who grew up in a small South Carolina town, also has been silent on the attack on two Indian engineers in Kansas last week, which was suspected to be a hate crime and which threatens to cloud Indian-American relations.