This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39109107

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Tunisia terror attack: Inquest into death of 30 Britons to finish Tunisia terror attack: Inquest into death of 30 Britons to finish
(about 4 hours later)
The inquest into the deaths of 30 Britons in a terror attack at a Tunisian resort is to conclude later.The inquest into the deaths of 30 Britons in a terror attack at a Tunisian resort is to conclude later.
A total of 38 people were killed when an Islamist gunman opened fire at a hotel in Sousse on 26 June 2015.A total of 38 people were killed when an Islamist gunman opened fire at a hotel in Sousse on 26 June 2015.
The inquest examined whether the UK government and travel firms failed to protect British tourists.The inquest examined whether the UK government and travel firms failed to protect British tourists.
But the coroner will explain later why he has rejected a request to rule neglect was a contributory factor in their deaths.But the coroner will explain later why he has rejected a request to rule neglect was a contributory factor in their deaths.
The attack at the five-star Riu Imperial Marhaba hotel was the deadliest on Britons since the 7 July 2005 London bombings.The attack at the five-star Riu Imperial Marhaba hotel was the deadliest on Britons since the 7 July 2005 London bombings.
The gunman, Seifeddine Rezgui, was later shot dead by police.The gunman, Seifeddine Rezgui, was later shot dead by police.
What exactly happened on the day?What exactly happened on the day?
Tunisia attack: 'He sacrificed himself'Tunisia attack: 'He sacrificed himself'
One survivor's recurring nightmareOne survivor's recurring nightmare
Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith is expected to say that all 30 Britons were unlawfully killed and to explain his reasons for not accepting the neglect submission.Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith is expected to say that all 30 Britons were unlawfully killed and to explain his reasons for not accepting the neglect submission.
The inquest has previously heard that "part of the attack or most of it could have been prevented" had security been tighter.The inquest has previously heard that "part of the attack or most of it could have been prevented" had security been tighter.
Tour operator TUI has been accused of failing to vet security at the hotel, but the firm has argued "matters could have been worse" during the attack.Tour operator TUI has been accused of failing to vet security at the hotel, but the firm has argued "matters could have been worse" during the attack.
The inquest, which began in January at London's Royal Courts of Justice, has also heard evidence that:The inquest, which began in January at London's Royal Courts of Justice, has also heard evidence that:
The Tunisian ambassador to the UK, Nabil Ammar, said his country had been unprepared for such an attack and it was unfair to blame police.
"How can you imagine that police deliberately wanted people to die?" he asked BBC Radio 4's Today programme.
Since the attack, he said security in the country and in hotels had improved, and Tunisia was now considered as safe a destination as London.
Tunisia should, he added, be shown the same solidarity shown to other countries which have experienced similar attacks.
Andrew Ritchie, who is representing 20 victims' families, told the inquest they believed TUI's "utter complacency" amounted to neglect.Andrew Ritchie, who is representing 20 victims' families, told the inquest they believed TUI's "utter complacency" amounted to neglect.
He said the guards at the Riu Imperial Marhaba had not been an effective deterrent and the lack of CCTV had made it a target.He said the guards at the Riu Imperial Marhaba had not been an effective deterrent and the lack of CCTV had made it a target.
But Howard Stevens, counsel for TUI, said even if there had been additional CCTV cameras or guards it "cannot be said that any of these measures would probably have made a difference".But Howard Stevens, counsel for TUI, said even if there had been additional CCTV cameras or guards it "cannot be said that any of these measures would probably have made a difference".
The travel company maintained it was "wholly erroneous" to claim it had been neglectful and there was insufficient evidence of any gross failure.The travel company maintained it was "wholly erroneous" to claim it had been neglectful and there was insufficient evidence of any gross failure.