This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2017/feb/28/essential-poll-malcolm-turnbull-intelligent-hardworking-out-of-touch-politics-live
The article has changed 18 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 9 | Version 10 |
---|---|
Labor targets Coalition MPs who say voters penalty rate cut is positive – question time live | |
(35 minutes later) | |
3.33am GMT | |
03:33 | |
Labor’s Tony Burke has asked a backbencher Andrew Laming a question, in his position as chair of the standing committee on employment, education and training. He wants to know whether Laming, a bit of a rebel, would consider public hearings into the penalty rate cuts. | |
Burke says it is in order. Christopher Pyne, as leader of the house, says it is not in order. | |
Speaker Tony Smith allows the question. | |
Laming says the committee will consider it at its next meeting, given the public hearings are already scheduled. | |
3.28am GMT | |
03:28 | |
3.27am GMT | |
03:27 | |
Denison independent Andrew Wilkie to Turnbull: I met recently with Daryl Gangel, who has now lost his part pension and must live on just $26,000 a year from his superannuation. This is barely above the poverty line. I’ve also met with [those on] defined superannuation benefits who have had the pensions slashed and are also struggling. Prime Minister, the government is doing no better with aged care, despite my repeated representations, and in particular, it’s gutted funding for residential care to the tune of $1.2bn. Prime Minister, what will you do to end this ruthless campaign against older Australians? | |
Turnbull says the changes only apply to those with significant assets apart from the family home. | |
He said the expectation is that “people will draw down on the assets to support themselves in retirement where they can”. | |
He reminds the parliament that Labor and the Greens supported the changes and John Howard was responsible for them. | |
Now, in 2007, when the government was banking surpluses and had billions of dollars in the bank, the asset test was made more generous. That decision was changed, as I said, around 18 months ago in the middle of 2015. Times had changed and we had to live within our means, and that was the tough decision that was taken by the government. | |
Updated | |
at 3.29am GMT | |
3.22am GMT | |
03:22 | |
Labor’s Jason Clare to Turnbull: The trade minister said today about people impacted by the cuts to penalty rates, and I quote, “It’s only those on the margins.” Why does this government think that a wage cut of up to $77 a week of nearly 700,000 low paid Australian workers is just a marginal issue? | |
Turnbull: | |
No individual in this parliament had more to do with setting up that review of modern awards and penalty rates than the leadership. He owns it, it’s his process. Is he seriously suggesting that it never occurred to him that any of these penalty rates would be reduced? | |
This is what trade minister Steve Ciobo said. | |
Council of Small Business said that 80% of people will not be affected by this decision … because they’re on EBAs. So it’s only those on the margins, the 20% that are likely to be affected. | |
Updated | |
at 3.28am GMT | |
3.17am GMT | |
03:17 | |
3.15am GMT | |
03:15 | |
Paul Karp | |
Sam Dastyari is trying to drill down into whether Australia Post’s chairman, John Stanhope, had discussions with the government about executive pay before it blew up as an issue in October. | |
Stanhope does not recall a discussion with communications minister, Mitch Fifield, although Fifield said he had mentioned when he became minister that executive pay was a matter that drew attention from time to time. | |
Stanhope does remember a discussion with then-communications minister Malcolm Turnbull about pay, in which Turnbull queried why it was so high closer to September 2013. Stanhope said it was to attract executive talent, because Australia Post is a parcel business that competes with commercial operations. | |
There’s a kerfuffle as Dastyari keeps calling Turnbull the “prime minister” rather than “then-communications minister”. The cheeky Labor senator quips that Turnbull was “planning to be but wasn’t yet [prime minister]”. | |
3.13am GMT | |
03:13 | |
Labor to Turnbull: Does Government policy agree with the member for Chisholm who told Kristina Keneally on Sky Today that she would be telling her electorate the decision to cut penalty rates for 700,000 Australians is a good thing? | |
Question time is continuing as it did yesterday. | |
Labor is hammering the penalty rate cut. Turnbull is saying Labor supported the Fair Work Commission and it is the independent umpire. Labor appointed the five members of the FWC. | |
3.05am GMT | |
03:05 | |
Shorten to Turnbull: Can the prime minister confirm his colleague, the Liberal member for Gilmore, was describing Government policy when she said, “It’s a gift for our young people that their penalty rates that been cut?” | |
Turnbull says the hardworking member for Gilmore knows the penalty cut will create more employment opportunities by allowing small businesses to open on weekends. | |
Let me look at the comparison between big business and small business. This is a very important issue. Now, we stand for small business. Labor invariably lines up with big business. How is it that a small take away business pays $29.16 on a Sunday for an employee under the award, whereas McDonalds down the street can pay $21.08 for the same worker doing the same work? Why? Because they’ve done a deal with the union. | |
3.00am GMT | |
03:00 | |
I’ll just cross to question time now but Paul Karp will keep us up to date on Ahmed Fahour. | |
2.56am GMT | 2.56am GMT |
02:56 | 02:56 |
John Stanhope says Aus Post salary structures are referenced on salaries offered by similar businesses which are major global parcel companies. | John Stanhope says Aus Post salary structures are referenced on salaries offered by similar businesses which are major global parcel companies. |
He underlined that the board does not need to seek permission for the salary but communication of the salary to government has been traditionally through the annual report. | He underlined that the board does not need to seek permission for the salary but communication of the salary to government has been traditionally through the annual report. |
In 2014-15, it was no longer a requirement. | In 2014-15, it was no longer a requirement. |
He said it was a mistake not to disclose the salary (voluntarily). | He said it was a mistake not to disclose the salary (voluntarily). |
Stanhope says he will disclose the 2014-15 salary – on notice. That is, not now. | Stanhope says he will disclose the 2014-15 salary – on notice. That is, not now. |
Updated | Updated |
at 2.58am GMT | at 2.58am GMT |