This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-39051972

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Facebook confusion over fake cancer babies U-turn Facebook confusion over fake cancer babies U-turns
(about 3 hours later)
Facebook has restored an account that posted stolen photos of children falsely claiming they had cancer. Facebook has apologised for repeatedly restoring an account that posted stolen photos of children falsely claiming they had cancer.
It is the second time the social network has disabled the account following complaints, only to re-enable it hours later. The social network twice disabled the account following complaints, only to re-enable it hours later.
A spokeswoman for the social network was unable to explain the move and said it was being investigated. "These posts are clearly distressing for the families and this content has now been removed," a spokeswoman said.
One internet expert said the move was "bonkers" and called into question Facebook's complaints procedures. "We apologise for the delay in taking them down."
The social network acted for a third time after the matter was brought to its attention by the BBC. It has not explained the actions of its complaints team.
One internet expert said the behaviour had been "bonkers" and called into question Facebook's safety procedures.
Fake appeal
The BBC reported on Tuesday the case of a child from Cambridgeshire whose photos had been used alongside a fake plea for help.The BBC reported on Tuesday the case of a child from Cambridgeshire whose photos had been used alongside a fake plea for help.
"This little baby has cancer and he need money for surgery," the accompanying post stated."This little baby has cancer and he need money for surgery," the accompanying post stated.
It added that Facebook would donate money for every "like", comment or share of the message.It added that Facebook would donate money for every "like", comment or share of the message.
And more than one million people responded. The picture was posted at the start of February. More than one million people responded.
The picture was posted at the start of February.
Security experts said such tactics were often used by "like farming" scammers.Security experts said such tactics were often used by "like farming" scammers.
Perpetrators attempt to engage as many users as possible so that they can later target them with follow-up messages and/or sell on the profile page and its associated contacts to unscrupulous marketers.Perpetrators attempt to engage as many users as possible so that they can later target them with follow-up messages and/or sell on the profile page and its associated contacts to unscrupulous marketers.
The mother of the child - Sarah Allen from St Neots, Cambridgeshire - said she had been upset by the discovery.The mother of the child - Sarah Allen from St Neots, Cambridgeshire - said she had been upset by the discovery.
"We had people messaging saying they had heard Jasper has cancer," she told the BBC."We had people messaging saying they had heard Jasper has cancer," she told the BBC.
"He doesn't. These were pictures from when he had chickenpox.""He doesn't. These were pictures from when he had chickenpox."
Facebook has removed the post featuring Jasper Allen's pictures, but other similar fake cancer posts featuring other children remain live. Facebook eventually deleted this post but - after overturning Tuesday's short-lived account block - left similar fake cancer posts featuring other children live.
The BBC has determined they include an image of a three-year-old girl from England, who was injured in a road accident in 2015. The image belongs to her parents. The BBC determined they included an photo of a three-year-old girl from England, who was injured in a road accident in 2015. The image belongs to her parents.
"I need the photo to be removed," the mother of the girl - who asked not to be named - said when the BBC informed her of its misuse. "I need the photo to be removed," said the mother of the girl - who asked not to be named - when she was informed of its misuse.
"I am extremely upset about it.""I am extremely upset about it."
Other images show: Other images showed:
In addition, the account features several photos of dead young children in coffins, claiming users will have "76 year of bad luck" if they scroll past without liking or sharing the posts. In addition, the account featured several photos of dead young children in coffins, claiming users would have "76 year of bad luck" if they scrolled past without liking or sharing the posts.
Facebook's community standards say it does not allow posts featuring images that infringe other people's copyright.Facebook's community standards say it does not allow posts featuring images that infringe other people's copyright.
The company does not require each rights holder to make a claim before acting.The company does not require each rights holder to make a claim before acting.
'Bare minimum''Bare minimum'
Facebook first disabled the account on 10 January after Mrs Allen had sent several messages to its complaints team, only for it to be made live again the next day.Facebook first disabled the account on 10 January after Mrs Allen had sent several messages to its complaints team, only for it to be made live again the next day.
The social network took the account offline again on Tuesday afternoon, but it was active again about five hours later.The social network took the account offline again on Tuesday afternoon, but it was active again about five hours later.
Cybersecurity expert Prof Alan Woodward said Facebook did not appear to have scrutinised the case closely enough despite the publicity it had generated. The BBC questioned the decision early this morning. But it was not until about 15:00 GMT that the account was taken offline for a third time.
Cybersecurity expert Prof Alan Woodward said Facebook did not appear to have scrutinised the case closely enough despite the publicity it had already generated.
"Clearly anybody should have the right to appeal their account being taken down, but if it's returned up that quickly it doesn't show much due process has been taken in checking it out," said the University of Surrey lecturer."Clearly anybody should have the right to appeal their account being taken down, but if it's returned up that quickly it doesn't show much due process has been taken in checking it out," said the University of Surrey lecturer.
"It's difficult not to conclude Facebook is doing the bare minimum here." "It's difficult not to conclude Facebook was doing the bare minimum here."