This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/22/chinese-internet-giant-weibo-gags-donald-trumps-feminist-critics

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Donald Trump's feminist critics gagged by Chinese internet giant Weibo Donald Trump's feminist critics gagged by Chinese internet giant Weibo
(35 minutes later)
Chinese feminists have hit out at their country’s answer to Twitter after it gagged one of their movement’s most visible social media accounts in an apparent bid to stifle criticism of US president Donald Trump.Chinese feminists have hit out at their country’s answer to Twitter after it gagged one of their movement’s most visible social media accounts in an apparent bid to stifle criticism of US president Donald Trump.
The “Feminist Voice in China” account on social networking site Sina Weibo was handed a 30-day ban on Monday for allegedly violating Chinese law.The “Feminist Voice in China” account on social networking site Sina Weibo was handed a 30-day ban on Monday for allegedly violating Chinese law.
The punishment came six days after the group posted a Chinese translation of an article - first published in the Guardian - in which US-based feminist academics called for a new “militant feminist struggle”, partly in response to Trump’s “aggressively misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic and racist policies”.The punishment came six days after the group posted a Chinese translation of an article - first published in the Guardian - in which US-based feminist academics called for a new “militant feminist struggle”, partly in response to Trump’s “aggressively misogynistic, homophobic, transphobic and racist policies”.
The article urged activists to launch an “international strike” on 8 March to protest male violence and support reproductive rights.The article urged activists to launch an “international strike” on 8 March to protest male violence and support reproductive rights.
Xiong Jing, an editor for the “Feminist Voice”, told the Guardian that Weibo had sent the group a private message on Monday night informing it that the account, which was set up in 2010 and has more than 80,000 followers, had been temporarily blocked. Weibo blamed “recent publications [that] violated the state’s relevant laws”.Xiong Jing, an editor for the “Feminist Voice”, told the Guardian that Weibo had sent the group a private message on Monday night informing it that the account, which was set up in 2010 and has more than 80,000 followers, had been temporarily blocked. Weibo blamed “recent publications [that] violated the state’s relevant laws”.
Xiong claimed “insiders” at the social media giant had said the order originated from Beijing’s internet watchdog, the Cyberspace Administration of China. “They simply sent a message to block feminist voices in China.”
Speaking to Radio Free Asia, a US-funded news outlet, Xiong said Weibo had not been “very specific” about its motivations but “we are guessing that it’s because we sent out some tweets calling for a women’s strike action against Trump”.Speaking to Radio Free Asia, a US-funded news outlet, Xiong said Weibo had not been “very specific” about its motivations but “we are guessing that it’s because we sent out some tweets calling for a women’s strike action against Trump”.
Li Maizi, one of the leading lights of China’s nascent feminist movement, said the attempt to silence “Feminist Voice” was part of a broader government push to rein in those battling for gender equality. “It is part of a public opinion war and a battle for influence in China.”Li Maizi, one of the leading lights of China’s nascent feminist movement, said the attempt to silence “Feminist Voice” was part of a broader government push to rein in those battling for gender equality. “It is part of a public opinion war and a battle for influence in China.”
By blocking the account, authorities were sending a warning to the movement. “They are dipping their toes [in the water]. It’s like: ‘This time I deleted this one story but next time I’ll delete them all.’”By blocking the account, authorities were sending a warning to the movement. “They are dipping their toes [in the water]. It’s like: ‘This time I deleted this one story but next time I’ll delete them all.’”
The ban may also reflect Beijing’s nervousness about the state of US-China relations in the Trump era.The ban may also reflect Beijing’s nervousness about the state of US-China relations in the Trump era.
Trump’s shock election - and his appointment of several ferociously anti-China voices - has fuelled Chinese fears that a dramatic and destabilising downturn in relations is on the cards.Trump’s shock election - and his appointment of several ferociously anti-China voices - has fuelled Chinese fears that a dramatic and destabilising downturn in relations is on the cards.
Such concerns faded earlier this month after President Xi Jinping and Trump held what the White House called an “extremely cordial” telephone conversation. However, lingering angst means Beijing has sought to contain any criticism of Trump that might further complicate its ability to engage with Washington.Such concerns faded earlier this month after President Xi Jinping and Trump held what the White House called an “extremely cordial” telephone conversation. However, lingering angst means Beijing has sought to contain any criticism of Trump that might further complicate its ability to engage with Washington.
A propaganda directive leaked to the China Digital Times website last month showed Chinese newsrooms had been instructed to tow the Communist party line when covering Trump.A propaganda directive leaked to the China Digital Times website last month showed Chinese newsrooms had been instructed to tow the Communist party line when covering Trump.
“Any news about Trump must be handled carefully; unauthorized criticism of Trump’s words or actions is not allowed,” it said.“Any news about Trump must be handled carefully; unauthorized criticism of Trump’s words or actions is not allowed,” it said.
The live broadcast of Trump’s inaugural speech was forbidden while news outlets were ordered only to use stories about Trump produced by Xinhua, Beijing’s official news agency.The live broadcast of Trump’s inaugural speech was forbidden while news outlets were ordered only to use stories about Trump produced by Xinhua, Beijing’s official news agency.
Speaking in Beijing, Paul Stronski, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said it remained uncertain whether Trump’s foreign policy would be steered by characters such as chief strategist Steve Bannon who were “certainly looking for a showdown with China” or more conventional thinkers such secretary of state Rex Tillerson.Speaking in Beijing, Paul Stronski, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said it remained uncertain whether Trump’s foreign policy would be steered by characters such as chief strategist Steve Bannon who were “certainly looking for a showdown with China” or more conventional thinkers such secretary of state Rex Tillerson.
“We almost have two duelling governments here,” said Stronski, a senior state department analyst under Barack Obama. “It’s very unclear which is the actual direction this is going to take.”“We almost have two duelling governments here,” said Stronski, a senior state department analyst under Barack Obama. “It’s very unclear which is the actual direction this is going to take.”
Additional reporting by Wang ZhenAdditional reporting by Wang Zhen