This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/feb/20/climate-change-us-solutions-dangers-series

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Climate change in the US: the dangers and the solutions – about this series Climate change in the US: the dangers and the solutions – about this series
(10 days later)
This content is funded with support, in part, from the Skoll Foundation. Content is editorially independent and focuses on solutions to climate change and its impact. After the hottest year in recorded history last year, climate change is shifting from a far-off threat to an everyday reality in America.
This series, funded with support, in part, from the Skoll Foundation, will look at the impact of the problem and explore the solutions. Content is editorially independent.
At a time when there is anxiety around the direction of political leadership in the US on issues related to climate change, last year in the US there were eight floods considered once-in-every-500 year events. California faces drought, there have been unusually strong storms, and towns in states as diverse as Alaska and Louisiana have relocated due to sea level rise.
Clean energy including wind and solar are a huge part of the solution. We will talk to entrepreneurs, policy makers, as well as the communities at risk - the people finding ways to fight back.
This series will examine the economics of clean energy - the big picture for policy makers and businesses of different scales - and the opportunities for households to be part of the clean energy revolution, and potentially save money in the process.
All our journalism follows GNM’s published editorial code. The Guardian is committed to open journalism, recognising that the best understanding of the world is achieved when we collaborate, share knowledge, encourage debate, welcome challenge and harness the expertise of specialists and their communities.All our journalism follows GNM’s published editorial code. The Guardian is committed to open journalism, recognising that the best understanding of the world is achieved when we collaborate, share knowledge, encourage debate, welcome challenge and harness the expertise of specialists and their communities.
The only restriction to the Guardian’s coverage is where the Skoll Foundation is prohibited under US law from directly funding or earmarking funds to: (a) influence the outcome of any domestic or foreign election for public office; or (b) support lobbying or other attempts to influence legislation (local, state, federal, or foreign). This means any communications to the public in which a view is expressed about a specific legislative proposal, and the recipients of the communications are urged through a “call to action” to contact government officials, must provide a reasoned, objective consideration of facts and issues in a full and fair manner that enables third parties to develop their own positions on any legislation that may be discussed.The only restriction to the Guardian’s coverage is where the Skoll Foundation is prohibited under US law from directly funding or earmarking funds to: (a) influence the outcome of any domestic or foreign election for public office; or (b) support lobbying or other attempts to influence legislation (local, state, federal, or foreign). This means any communications to the public in which a view is expressed about a specific legislative proposal, and the recipients of the communications are urged through a “call to action” to contact government officials, must provide a reasoned, objective consideration of facts and issues in a full and fair manner that enables third parties to develop their own positions on any legislation that may be discussed.
Unless otherwise stated, all statements and materials, including any statements regarding specific legislation, reflect the views of the individual contributors and not those of the Skoll Foundation nor the Guardian.Unless otherwise stated, all statements and materials, including any statements regarding specific legislation, reflect the views of the individual contributors and not those of the Skoll Foundation nor the Guardian.
More about content funding on the GuardianMore about content funding on the Guardian