Hypocrisy of the west over fake news claim

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/feb/05/hypocrisy-of-the-west-over-fake-news-claim

Version 0 of 1.

The defence secretary, Michael Fallon, appears ignorant of well-established UK and US military programmes designed to modify public perceptions in conflict zones (Nato must counter Russia’s ‘weaponising’ of lies – Fallon, 3 February). A prototype system was first reported in detail by Nick Fielding and Ian Cobain in the Guardian nearly six years ago – just as Nato began air attacks on Libya (Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media, 18 March 2011).

I quote: “… it will allow the US military to create a false consensus in online conversations, crowd out unwelcome opinions and smother commentaries or reports that do not correspond with its own objectives … each fake online persona must have a convincing background, history and supporting details … up to 50 US-based controllers should be able to operate false identities from their workstations without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries”. Each operator would be able to masquerade as “10 separate identities”.

Two years ago the UK began similar operations from a centre in Berkshire, presented as “non-lethal warfare” (Army sends tweet into battle, 31 January 2015). The west’s overwhelming supremacy in IT, PR, virtual reality and advertising should dispel Fallon’s concern that Russia might win the fake news war.Dr Kevin BannonLondon

• It is not long since the US apologised to the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, for bugging her mobile (Report, 8 July 2015). And given that his government authorises GCHQ to hack other countries, Michael Fallon accusing the Russian government of “routinely lying”, smacks of western hypocrisy. David MurrayWallington, Surrey

• Jimmy Wales argues (The internet gave us fake news. Internet users can help defeat it, 4 February) that the answer to dishonesty on the net is transparency. I agree: and that’s a step that’s easy for you to take. A dip into your readers’ online comments demonstrates how anonymity releases the worst in everyone: bilious, ignorant and personal attacks, with little sign of anyone listening. Conversely, when Owen Jones met his worst online troll face to face, they were soon chatting amiably.

If the Guardian required real names online – as you do from me now! – the Cif pages would be transformed, and we might see some useful engagement. There is very little now.Julian Le VayOxford

• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com

• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters